1133 N Lake Pleasant Rd, Hillsdale, MI 49242
To contact a resident: (517) 437-0239
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Country Living of Hillsdale II Costs & Pricing
Country Living of Hillsdale II offers competitive monthly rates for its studio accommodations, priced at $3,600. This is notably lower than the average cost in Hillsdale County, which stands at $4,550, as well as below the state average for Michigan at $3,824. By providing a more affordable option compared to both local and state figures, Country Living of Hillsdale II positions itself as an appealing choice for those seeking quality care without the elevated financial burden typically associated with similar facilities. This pricing strategy reflects a commitment to make assisted living accessible while maintaining a high standard of services.
| Floor plans | Country Living of Hillsdale II | Hillsdale County | Michigan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $3,600 | $4,550 | $3,824 |
Overall Review of Country Living of Hillsdale II
Pros
Some of the staff there are great.
The grandmother really likes all of the employees there.
The staff check on everyone several times a day, and the small size allows for personalized attention.
Grandpa is really enjoying his space there.
The mother has received very loving care for more than three years as a resident.
The sister has had great interaction with all the staff during her stay.
The staff on duty offered the sister hugs and shared comforting memories.
The staff made Mom's final years much more joyful.
The facilities are clean.
Cons
They were not treated kindly by coworkers or management (including HR).
HR screamed at them in front of coworkers and residents when they were not at fault.
They were terminated due to health problems caused by pregnancy, and management lied about receiving help.
Management favored workers causing drama by moving them to the 1-assist house instead of them, despite promises of a transfer.
They were discriminated against and wrongfully terminated two days before Christmas.
A specific worker left medication lying around and admitted neglecting a resident.
Management and HR did not take proper action after being informed of the issues.
Some staff do not deserve to work in this industry.
The facility lacks transportation and assistance for residents to obtain groceries or personal items; family members must step in.
Review
Country Living of Hillsdale II is best suited for families seeking a small, homelike assisted living experience in Hillsdale, where residents are known by name and caregivers provide frequent, hands-on attention. The setting rewards ongoing relationships: staff check on residents multiple times daily, and families learn that a familiar team is watching over their loved ones. The model works for seniors who prefer a quiet, intimate atmosphere over a large campus, and for relatives who live far away but want consistent, visible care from a steady team. In short, this is a residence that thrives when personal contact and continuity matter most, rather than a high-traffic, service-mat objective.
That strength is tempered by practical limits that families should acknowledge: transportation is not provided, so residents cannot easily run errands or attend appointments without family or external arrangements. For seniors who rely on scheduled trips to grocery stores, medical visits, or social outings, alternative options with built-in transport may be necessary. The community also faces questions about governance and culture, since one review describes a problematic experience with management and HR at a different Country Living location, including perceived unfair treatment and a lack of transparency. While those reports are not a direct portrait of Hillsdale II, they raise legitimate concerns about consistency in oversight and accountability across the brand.
On balance, the strongest positives, small size, consistent daily presence from staff, and a reputation for attentive, affectionate care, often counterbalance the gaps. Families recount that caregivers check on every resident regularly, provide warmth, and treat residents with genuine kindness. Long-term residents have stayed in the home for years, and families express gratitude for the tenderness shown during difficult moments, including end-of-life care where staff offered comfort and shared memories. Cleanliness and a tidy environment also appear as a baseline expectation that supports safety and dignity. The downside remains that transportation gaps can frustrate independent residents, and any clamor about management culture echoes the need for ongoing transparent leadership.
Specific resident stories illustrate the value: a grandmother reportedly thrives on daily attention from a friendly team; a grandfather enjoys his private space within a well-kept setting; a mother who lived there for more than three years drew praise for ongoing, loving care, with multiple family members noting staff across shifts reaching out during family crises to offer support and encouragement. These accounts reflect a culture where staff-resident bonds grow into dependable daily routines and where caregivers become partners to families, not distant administrators. The consistency of care across shifts and the relational warmth become a meaningful counterpoint to the occasional logistical gaps.
Prospective residents should treat Hillsdale II as a practical choice for those prioritizing personal attention over gadget-laden programming. During tours, verify staff-to-resident ratios, ask how many caregivers cover night shifts, and request examples of daily checks and response times. Explore how transportation alternatives might be arranged, and whether local options or volunteer rides can fill the gap. Inquire about leadership stability, staff training, and how concerns are escalated and resolved. Finally, check recent turnover patterns and whether management demonstrates proactive communication with families, especially during transitions and health changes.
When weighed together, Country Living of Hillsdale II emerges as a compelling option for families seeking an intimate, human-centered setting in Hillsdale. The wins are concrete: a small, watchful environment where residents are known, cared for, and spoken to, with compassion, across shifts. The caveats are equally concrete: transportation gaps and potential leadership inconsistencies that call for diligence. If the resident prioritizes close daily contact, dignity, and a sense of community, Hillsdale II delivers; if the need for included transport or a highly structured oversight framework is primary, alternatives with more robust logistical supports should be explored first.


















Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.


