601 East Randolph Road, Silver Spring, MD 20904
To contact a resident: (301) 384-8500
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Manor at Colesville Costs & Pricing
The costs for residing at Manor at Colesville present a compelling alternative when compared to both Prince George's County and the broader Maryland area. For instance, a one-bedroom unit at Manor costs $773 per month, which starkly contrasts with the county average of $3,568 and the state's average of $3,904. Similarly, for two-bedroom accommodations, residents benefit from a monthly rate of $1,213 at Manor; this is significantly lower than the county's $3,193 and the state's average of $3,497. These figures highlight Manor at Colesville as not only an appealing choice for potential residents but also as a financially prudent option in comparison to local market rates.
| Floor plans | Manor at Colesville | Prince George's County | Maryland |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $773 | $3,568 | $3,904 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $1,213 | $3,193 | $3,497 |
Overall Review of Manor at Colesville
Pros
The clients liked the property very much.- The staff provided excellent assistance with the application and leasing process.
- The clients are very happy with their new residence.
- Willow Manor is very nice and offers a lot of activities.
- Residents enjoy the atmosphere.
- Willow Manor looks like a great possibility.
Cons
They have very serious problems about the property charges.- They are unsure who to address regarding these charges.
- They need to know who the overall owner of the property is because of the serious charge issues.
- They have issues they want to address about the Resident Manager.
- They note that the grounds are small and parking is limited.
Review
Manor at Colesville is best suited for active seniors who want a lively, activities-forward community and a move-in process that feels supported by approachable staff. Several reviews spotlight a strong leasing experience, staff who helped with applications and inquiries, delivering a smooth transition into a two-bedroom unit. Residents consistently describe the atmosphere as pleasant and the calendar of activities as robust, signaling a community where social engagement and daily structure are readily available. For someone prioritizing accessibility to programs, companionship, and a straightforward path to residency, this setting checks meaningful boxes.
That said, potential residents should explicitly consider alternatives if certain basics matter. The property’s grounds are described as small, and parking is limited, which can be a real constraint for households with multiple vehicles or visitors. More importantly, one review raises concerns about charges and questions ownership, highlighting a lack of clarity around who ultimately owns the property and who handles billing. For families or individuals who require transparent governance, clear line-item charges, and a straightforward ownership story, these gaps point toward exploring other communities first.
The standout pros, helpful staff, a streamlined application experience, and a rich slate of activities, tend to offset the listed drawbacks for many. The staff’s responsiveness during the leasing process and the general enthusiasm for the resident experience create a sense of security during a move. The abundant activities and welcoming atmosphere translate into ongoing opportunities for social engagement, which can greatly reduce the isolation some seniors fear. When the primary goal is a bustling, connected lifestyle, these positives can overshadow the limitations of space and parking.
Nevertheless, the concerns about ownership transparency and billing deserve careful scrutiny. Prospective residents should obtain written explanations of all charges and request a clear articulation of property ownership and management responsibilities before signing. The reviews imply that conversations about charges can be ambiguous, so insist on a documented budget, a schedule of fees, and a designated contact for financial questions. Without that clarity, the otherwise favorable experiences may become a source of ongoing friction, especially for those budgeting tightly or coordinating with family members who want to review every line item.
This community tends to align with residents who value energy, immediacy, and community-driven programming over expansive grounds or parking convenience. It serves well for seniors who prefer a sociable environment and rely on staff to navigate the move-in process and daily scheduling. For households prioritizing generous outdoor space, easy parking, or a transparent, owner-led governance structure, alternatives with larger footprints or more explicit financial controls will likely deliver greater peace of mind.
In the final assessment, Manor at Colesville delivers practical strengths that meet the needs of active, socially oriented seniors who want quick access to meaningful programming and a supportive leasing experience. The key caveats lie in the physical footprint, small grounds and limited parking, and the governance questions around ownership and charges. Families should weigh the value of a vibrant, staff-assisted living environment against the potential friction from billing ambiguities and space constraints. If transparency on ownership and a smoother parking picture are non-negotiables, it is prudent to compare with communities that emphasize those elements as part of their core operating model.
Active Adult Communities (55+)
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities off-site
Air-conditioning
Bath tubs
Devotional services off-site
Full kitchen
Handicap accessible
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Wheelchair accessible showers
Ronald Reagan Washington National (16 miles away)
Comprehensive Guide to Blood Pressure Charts for Older Adults: Understanding Normal and High Readings by Age
Financing Long-Term Nursing Home Care Through Social Security: A Thorough Exploration
Essential Knowledge on Pneumonia in Older Adults
