Serenity Senior Residence in Metairie, LA

Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby

• About the same

  Tranquil Living

  5 from 11 reviews

  $3,500 to $4,000 / month

  8.6 miles away
• from +$150 / mo

  The Suites at Algiers Point

  4.6 from 52 reviews

  $3,750 to $5,275 / month

  6.5 miles away
• from +$400 / mo

  Beau Maison

  4.6 from 25 reviews

  $4,000 to $5,600 / month

  2.0 miles away
• from -$615 / mo

  Azaleas Assisted Living At Woldenberg Village

  4.5 from 23 reviews

  $2,985 to $4,895 / month

  9.4 miles away
• from +$495 / mo

  SummerHouse Ashton Manor

  4.4 from 56 reviews

  $4,095 to $5,665 / month

  15.1 miles away

Pros

• The family is happy with the care provided and believes the wife is in the best place she can be.
• There has been a marked improvement in Michael's cognitive abilities since his time at Serenity, attributed to better medication administration and more personal care.
• Michael's POA is very pleased with the improvement in him.
• The staff are easy to work with and will do pretty much anything asked.
• They are very accommodating and will fix him something other than what's on the menu.
• Overall, the family is pleased with Serenity.

Cons

• The new medicine delivery has more than doubled the administration cost and more than tripled the cost of the medicine.
• There has been no improvement over the delivery system that it replaced.
• The food is OK at best, with no chefs working there.
• The facility does no activities; TV is it.
• In addition to the $3,400 monthly fee, they charge $275 per month to administer medications.

Review

Serenity Senior Residence in Metairie is best suited for families seeking highly personalized, hands-on care in a small, intimate setting. With about ten residents, the community thrives when daily routines can be tailored, medication oversight is a clear priority, and staff can respond quickly to evolving needs. This is a place where cognitive or medication-management challenges can improve under close supervision, and where the senior’s life is structured around flexible, accommodating support rather than a bustling, activity-driven environment. It works particularly well for residents who value stability, predictable staff relationships, and the ability to negotiate meals and care with a team that will go a step beyond to meet individual preferences.

That said, a number of families will want to consider alternatives. Serenity’s small size comes with limited social programming, the facility leans toward TV as its main activity, with little emphasis on structured recreation or outings. The kitchen is described as OK at best, with no on-site chefs, and the willingness to accommodate is notable but does not compensate for a sparse itinerary. For seniors whose quality of life hinges on robust activity calendars, diverse dining options, or a larger, more animated community, a larger assisted-living facility or campus with a fuller activity slate may be a better fit. Cost-sensitivity further motivates comparison, since medication-management arrangements add a separate line item that can complicate budgeting.

The strongest positives are tangible. Staff are easy to work with and remarkably accommodating, often willing to adjust routines and respond to requests quickly. In at least one instance, stronger medication administration, and more attentive overall care, coincided with a noticeable improvement in a resident’s cognitive function, to the point that family members could engage in normal conversations again. The care team’s attentiveness and flexibility consistently translate into practical benefits: timely medication administration, a willingness to fix meals beyond the menu, and a generally reassuring sense that the resident is in the right place. For families seeking reassurance that a loved one is being monitored closely and treated with respect, Serenity delivers.

However, the con side is meaningful and nontrivial. The financial structure is a meaningful consideration: the base monthly fee can run around $3,400, with an additional $275 per month charged specifically to administer medications, a cost that families often manage themselves by filling pill organizers, yet the latest medication-delivery changes have dramatically escalated both administration charges and drug costs, reportedly more than doubling administration costs and tripling the price of meds. In addition to price pressures, the very small resident community limits social opportunities and peer engagement, which can be a drawback for seniors who thrive on interaction and varied activities. These financial and experiential constraints must be weighed against the care gains.

Practically, prospective families should pursue a pointed set of confirmations before moving forward. Request a transparent, line-by-line cost breakdown that includes the medication administration fee, the current medication-delivery model, and any reliance on outside pharmacies. Probe the menu, kitchen staffing, and the level of culinary variation available for residents who do not want what’s on the menu. Ask for a clear picture of daily activities and out-of-house opportunities, and whether the community can partner with family to bring in meaningful programming if desired. Finally, demand a realistic assessment of how care changes with increasing needs, what happens if cognitive status declines or if mobility worsens, and how staff will respond to those shifts within the tiny resident population.

In the end, Serenity Senior Residence serves best those who prize steady, individualized care with close staff oversight and are prepared to pay a premium for disciplined medication management in a small, quiet setting. If the priority is a rich social life, chef-driven dining, or strong cost predictability, alternatives in the wider Metairie area deserve serious consideration. For families navigating Parkinson’s-related medication needs or cognitive support, and who can align expectations with the realities of a small, accommodating team, Serenity can be a solid, if not perfect, choice. The decision should hinge on whether the care gains justify the added medication-cost burden and the limited activity palette, given the specific needs and preferences of the prospective resident.