219 Stephens Dr, Princeton, KY 42445
To contact a resident: (270) 365-3254
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Highland Homes Inc
Pros
They believe Jesus can set them free.
They are living testimonies of faith, mercy, and grace.
They trust in Jesus and have faith that He delivers from the old life.
They are a new person in Jesus.
Jesus is the only one who can break every chain.
They are loved by Jesus.
They have found freedom from drugs and past burdens.
They consider Jesus as the only answer and source of mercy.
Cons
The place is disgusting, with floors duct-taped and urine on the floor.
The staff running the facility care nothing about their patients and should be replaced.
This place is worse than living in a pig pen.
Compared to other facilities, this place is not as good as it should be.
There isnāt enough money put into this place to keep it looking decent.
They donāt have a psychiatrist on staff.
It is a sad situation; without the compassionate workers it would get no stars.
The USA has the worst care of people with mental illness.
Review
Highland Homes Inc in Princeton, KY is best suited for families with very limited budgets who can provide steady oversight and who do not require high-level medical or psychiatric services for their loved ones. The facility sits in a small-town setting and offers basic personal-care assistance, but outcomes hinge on the degree of on-site supervision that families or local caregivers can supply. This is not a polished, hospital-like environment; it is a low-cost option where risk must be managed through vigilant involvement and careful monitoring of day-to-day operations.
Alternatives should be strongly considered for anyone whose loved one needs predictable staffing, robust medical oversight, or a consistently clean and safe living space. The absence of a dedicated psychiatrist and reliance on general practitioners for psychiatric medications signals limited access to specialized mental-health care. Staffing instability and turnover, repeatedly noted in reviews, suggest care could be inconsistent. Sanitation and safety concerns recur, raising serious questions about daily operations. When these elements are non-negotiable, higher-quality programs elsewhere are a more prudent choice.
On the plus side, the appeal of affordability and a smaller, community-oriented atmosphere can be meaningful for families able to supervise care closely. Some reviewers acknowledge compassionate workers and, in isolated statements, attempts at maintaining cleanliness. Yet these limited positives rarely compensate for the fundamental gaps observed: recurring cleanliness lapses, damaged areas, and specific reports of unsanitary conditions. The lack of solid clinical oversight, especially for residents with mental-health needs, means the lower price tag comes with a meaningful price in quality of care and peace of mind.
Safety and consistency emerge as the clearest fault lines. A disturbing account of a resident encountered late at night, coupled with comments about underpaid staff who may seek other jobs, points to potential gaps in supervision and emergency response. The overall rating, significantly below average, reflects a pattern of dissatisfaction and alarm from multiple families. When contrasted with the few favorable mentions, the message remains clear: care quality is uneven, and reliability is not assured. For families balancing budget with basic safety, this mismatch is not easily ignored.
Practically, the evaluation path is straightforward: insist on multiple, unannounced visits; pull the latest inspection reports; meet with the administrator and the charge nurse; observe staff responsiveness and resident interactions; and review medication-management practices. Probe for access to mental-health professionals and clear care plans for residents with behavioral or psychiatric needs. The cost savings must be weighed against the likelihood of higher caregiver turnover, inconsistent cleanliness, and potential safety gaps. If any major red flags persist, especially around supervision, sanitation, or medical oversight, prioritize facilities with stronger clinical support and steadier staffing.
In sum, Highland Homes Inc does not meet the standard families should demand for reliable safety, consistent cleanliness, and steady clinical oversight. It may function as a last-resort option when affordability and intensive family oversight are non-negotiable, but the risk calculus is heavy. For anyone whose loved one requires regular medical or psychiatric support, or who cannot commit to rigorous on-site management, exploring other Kentucky options offers a far more predictable, safer path to sustained well-being and dignity.






Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps