1259 Shannon Dr., Iowa City, IA 52246
To contact a resident: (319) 887-1010
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Concord Terrace Costs & Pricing
Concord Terrace offers a remarkably competitive pricing structure for its two-bedroom units, with a monthly cost of just $610. This rate stands in stark contrast to the average rental prices in Johnson County, which are around $2,600, and even more so when compared to the broader state averages that reach approximately $3,329. Such affordability not only highlights Concord Terrace's commitment to providing accessible housing options but also positions it as an attractive alternative for those seeking quality living spaces without breaking the bank. This significant cost advantage may appeal to a variety of residents looking for both comfort and value in their housing choices.
| Floor plans | Concord Terrace | Johnson County | Iowa |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Bedrooms | $610 | $2,600 | $3,329 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Concord Terrace
Cons
The building manager doesn't do her job properly.
She becomes very rude after you move in.
She kicks people off the property.
She also thinks she is God.
Review
Concord Terrace in Iowa City is best suited for seniors who want an affordable assisted-living option and can tolerate a hands-on, sometimes inflexible management style. The community appears to serve residents who prefer self-sufficiency and a compact, predictable routine where staff wield pronounced authority over daily life, visits, socializing, and informal rules all fall under close supervision. For those who value practicality over luxury, and who donât demand highly responsive service or resident-led decision making, the setting can feel manageable. It is not a high-end community; it operates as a lean, budget-conscious choice that relies heavily on the building manager to set the tone.
Those for whom cordial, proactive on-site leadership is non-negotiable will want to consider alternatives. Families seeking consistent, respectful communication, transparent grievance processes, and a climate that discourages drama or punitive measures will likely find Concord Terrace lacking. If safety concerns, staff accountability, or clear boundaries around resident visitors and social circles are priorities, explore other facilities with documented resident-rights policies, formal complaint channels, and more predictable staffing patterns. In short, Concord Terrace may deliver basic shelter and routine care, but it does not reassure on governance or day-to-day resident protection.
On the upside, a positive rating from at least one reviewer hints that some residents see value in the community, potentially in cost, location, or services that meet basic needs. The limited praise cannot erase the larger red flags raised by the other account, but it suggests the facility can work for a subset of residents who do not require exceptionally responsive management. The apparent absence of high-end amenities and a lean staff footprint means any upside is modest, yet real for those prioritizing budget and simplicity over extensive programming or strong advocacy from staff.
The core concerns center on the building managerâs conduct and its ripple effects. The reviewer describes underperformance in routine administration, followed by confrontational or punitive actions, residentsâ friends being asked to leave and tensions that escalate instead of de-escalating. Such behavior undermines trust, creates a tense social climate, and raises legitimate safety concerns. When management staff interpret rules as weapons, the resident experience becomes unpredictable, with real potential for misunderstandings to spiral into conflicts that residents cannot easily resolve through formal channels.
Families evaluating Concord Terrace should adopt a structured due-diligence approach. During tours, observe how staff interact with residents, whether communication is transparent and respectful, and if the manager engages with residents as partners rather than enforcers. Ask direct questions about complaint handling, incident reporting, visitor policies, and consequences for staff or residents who cross boundaries. Request a copy of the resident rights policy, and speak with several current residents about daily life, not just promotional statements. If possible, arrange a trial period to test how conflicts are handled and whether concerns are resolved promptly and fairly.
Overall, Concord Terrace presents a clear bargain: low cost and basic services in a compact setting, tempered by a management culture that can feel overbearing and punitive. For families where governance and resident well-being hinge on respectful, accountable leadership, alternatives deserve serious consideration. If pursuing Concord Terrace, insist on specific guarantees: documented policies, defined escalation paths, and independent oversight for disputes. The decision should tilt toward facilities with proven, resident-first management practices, unless the current environment is fully aligned with the familyâs tolerance for friction and control.














Powerful Realities of Elder Abuse and the Most Effective Ways to Report It
Ten Vital Duties of a Senior Caregiver: A Comprehensive Guide
9 Stimulating Memory Activities for Seniors: Puzzles, Cards, and Much More