Sunrise on Old Meridian Costs & Pricing
At Sunrise on Old Meridian, the monthly costs for various room types present a competitive option when compared to both Hamilton County and the broader state of Indiana. The studio apartment is priced at $1,840, significantly lower than the county average of $3,561 and the state average of $3,258. For those seeking more space, the one-bedroom unit at $3,190 remains attractive against Hamilton County's higher rate of $3,945 and Indiana's typical cost of $3,300. The two-bedroom option is listed at $4,597; while it exceeds Hamilton County's average of $4,463, it offers substantial savings compared to Indiana's 2-bedroom rate of just $3,208. Finally, the semi-private accommodations are available for $5,130 - a figure that surpasses both local ($4,746) and state averages ($3,739), indicating a premium experience in this category. Overall, Sunrise on Old Meridian provides a range of pricing that reflects its commitment to quality living while remaining mindful of budget considerations in comparison to surrounding regions.
| Floor plans | Sunrise on Old Meridian | Hamilton County | Indiana |
|---|
| Studio | $1,840 | $3,561 | $3,258 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,190 | $3,945 | $3,300 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $4,597 | $4,463 | $3,208 |
| Semi-Private | $5,130 | $4,746 | $3,739 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$225 / mo
Brownsburg Meadows Assisted Living
$2,065 to $4,165 / month
15.6 miles away
-
from +$335 / mo
Sugar Grove
$2,175 to $4,650 / month
23.7 miles away
-
from +$110 / mo
Springhurst Health Campus
$1,950 to $2,760 / month
22.3 miles away
-
from +$110 / mo
Five Star Residences of Noblesville
$1,950 to $5,355 / month
8.0 miles away
-
from +$258 / mo
Kesslerwood Place
$2,098 to $4,348 / month
8.5 miles away
Overall Review of Sunrise on Old Meridian
differentiator
8 reviews mention this
Memory care seems thoughtfully staged
Memory care is described as having more than one level as needs change.
Multiple families describe memory care as staged, with an entry level that can later shift to a more advanced setting as dementia progresses. Residents and families also mention unit-appropriate activities rather than leaving people to pass time, and they note staff working to keep residents safe. In reviews, security is brought up directly for wandering risk, while others focus on room layout and how the memory care environment feels. A small number of reviewers felt memory care was not a fit for their expectations, including concerns about room layout and staffing-related care.
common
13 reviews mention this
Marilyn leads engaging activities
Residents repeatedly credit Marilyn with keeping days full and enjoyable.
A large share of reviews mention Marilyn by name and connect her with a steady stream of activities, outings, and fun programs. Families describe her as proactiveâhelping with transitions, leading trips, and stepping in when family members need support. Several reviewers say their loved ones stayed busy and engaged because of the activity planning, from group events to day-to-day social time. The activity focus also comes through in how residents and families describe feeling âat homeâ and connected to others.
common
20 reviews mention this
Staff responsiveness stands out
Caregivers are repeatedly described as attentive and quick to help.
Across reviews, families praise staff for being communicative, helpful, and responsive when issues come up. Some families describe getting timely follow-through with care needs, and others mention staff accompanying residents or supporting medical situations when they needed coordination. A few reviews include concerns about follow-up or workloadâsuch as meals being missed or care not matching a described planâbut even those reviews still contrast moments where staff support was effective. Overall, many reviewers emphasize day-to-day attentiveness and willingness to address questions.
common
12 reviews mention this
Clean, well-kept facility impressions
Many reviews describe the community as clean and well maintained.
Residents and families frequently mention cleanliness and upkeep, including impressions that the facility feels modern, updated, and well cared for. Several reviews also tie cleanliness to comfort and confidence, especially after move-in. Where criticism appears, it is more about specific units or conditions (like missing upkeep items or concerns about how certain areas looked), rather than a blanket statement that the building is neglected. A few reviewers also note rooms being refreshed before arrival.
caveat
14 reviews mention this
Food quality is a mixed point
Dining experiences vary, with some residents unhappy with food.
Dining comes up often, with many reviewers saying meals were good, varied, or well prepared, including mentions of alternatives and staff bringing food to the floor. At the same time, several reviews criticize the foodâdescribing it as not appealing, not matching preferences, or inconsistent with a planned diet. Some concerns also connect dining to care execution, including missed meals and not following a food plan as expected. Overall, dining is an area where experiences diverge more than other parts of the community.
caveat
9 reviews mention this
Pricing is a recurring concern
Cost concerns show up repeatedly, especially around move-in fees and increases.
Several reviews mention affordability, including comments about high upfront or entrance fees and concerns about ongoing charges. Some reviewers also describe pricing changes as care needs increased, while another notes limits on continuing residency when funds are exhausted and the need for private pay. Even where families were generally pleased with care and amenities, cost still came up as a deciding factor or regret point. One review also questions whether certain items would be charged beyond room and board.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.