Hollander Senior Living of Sandy Springs
Save5399 Northland Drive, Ne, Atlanta, GA 30342
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
Across a chorus of online reviews, the Hollander-owned senior living facilities in Monroe and the nearby Sandy Springs area evoke a deeply mixed and sometimes distressing portrait. Some reviewers praise individual staff members and certain moments of care, while others recount abrupt leadership decisions, troubling staffing instability, and a sense that the welfare of residents - especially those with lower income or limited family support - was subordinated to business considerations. Taken together, the comments sketch a landscape where personal dedication from some employees and volunteers sits in stark contrast to accusations of callous management and abrupt changes that left families scrambling to protect their loved ones.
A central grievance centers on the Monroe facility, where allegations are that Elliott Hollander announced a rapid shutdown and displacement for residents. Reviewers describe an email sent on March 22 instructing families that the facility would close by April 30, with residents expected to be out by 5 p.m. that day. According to these accounts, Hollander did not appear in person to address residents or families; instead, he was claimed to be attending a music festival in Charleston and then skiing in Aspen, projecting an image of detachment from the immediate human impact of the decision. The aftermath is described as chaotic: staff who remained largely left soon after, leaving the burden of repositioning residents to Christy and Mary as best they could. Families faced a scramble to secure new placements, with some residents lacking local family support or sufficient income to navigate Medicare placements. The overarching charge is that Hollander abandoned the operational and emotional responsibilities of caring for dozens of vulnerable elders at a moment of upheaval, effectively transferring the duty of rehoming to others while offering little accountability or contingency planning.
Within these accounts, the human consequences extend beyond the moment of closure. Reviewers note that residents were suddenly cut loose without clear guidance or continuity of care, and that the financial and logistical fallout fell disproportionately on those with fewer resources. The sense of being left to fend for oneself amid a regulatory and bureaucratic process for elder care - the kind of process that already overwhelms families - appears to have compounded the emotional trauma of relocation. In some stories, the families describe stepping in to advocate for care, to communicate with Medicare, and to help families search for new arrangements, all while contending with the emotional toll of sudden disruption for elderly loved ones who had established routines and relationships in the Monroe community. The thread is consistent: when leadership changes or exits, the burden lands on residents, their families, and the already stretched staff who remain to navigate the fallout.
A separate thread concerns the Buckhead location, formerly known as Summers Landing before Hollander's management took hold. A family recounts that their grandmother had spent three years there and that the daughter, who had volunteered there for many years, remained deeply invested in the welfare of residents. After the management transition to Hollander, the same family encountered a troubling shift: the facility reportedly began charging the daughter to visit her own mother, implying a fee to participate in daily activities or to engage with residents. The claim that a family member must pay as a condition of visiting - perhaps framed as "pay to volunteer" - highlights a perceived erosion of the goodwill and volunteer spirit that had previously anchored the family's involvement. The reviewer frames this as emblematic of a broader pattern in which the care ecosystem appears to have tilted toward a more transactional model, at least for those who lack abundant financial resources, challenging the notion of a community-centered, charitable environment.
Beyond these structural concerns, several reviewers voice frustration with operational responsiveness and the day-to-day functioning of facilities. One account describes a lack of call bells in residents' rooms and an inability to reach the desk by phone at various times, suggesting gaps in timely assistance for essential needs, including bathroom help. The impression is that, even when the marketing materials highlighted "24-hour" care, the lived experience did not always align with that promise. Some reviewers reported patients wearing the same clothes for days, insinuating lapses in basic hygiene and assistance, and indicating that calls for help could go unanswered for extended periods. The repeated complaint is that concerns about safety and dignity - elements that families are keen to safeguard - were not consistently met, prompting worry about whether residents were receiving the level of attention and responsiveness they deserved.
Amid the negative portrayals, however, there are notable counterpoints that underscore variance in experience within the same organizations. Several reviewers highlight the competence, warmth, and dedication of individual staff members, offering a counterbalance to the broader criticisms. They praise staff who go "the extra mile" to support residents, and point to specific people as bright spots in an otherwise challenging picture. Therese, in particular, is singled out by multiple reviewers for her kindness and the compassionate care she helped provide as health needs grew more complex. An activities coordinator from New Orleans, along with a predecessor in that role, is also mentioned as someone who consistently brought cheer and engagement to residents. In short, while some reviewers recount difficult management and care challenges, others emphasize that certain staff members - through their attitude, reliability, and direct care - made meaningful differences in residents' daily lives.
The tension between management decisions and frontline care threads through more than one story. A common sentiment is that strong, caring staff members are doing their best under trying circumstances, while the leadership and policy directions of the Hollander organization - especially when it comes to abrupt closures, staffing instability, and financial expectations - are perceived as undermining the very foundations of trust and safety that families rely on. Some reviewers express outright disappointment with what they see as a misalignment between the personal values celebrated in the facility's public persona - "respect your elders," as one post mocks in relation to the owner's public image - and the lived realities of residents and their families. The pictures of the owner and grandmother joined by hashtags like #respectyourelders stand in stark contrast to accounts of residents being displaced, families scrambling for options, and staff bearing the brunt of disruptions that many believe were avoidable with more thoughtful planning and transparent communication.
Taken together, the reviews present a nuanced, sometimes contradictory picture. On one hand, there are vivid, heartfelt attestations to the warmth, patience, and competence of individual caregivers who have supported residents through illness, memory challenges, and daily routines. On the other hand, there are alarming claims about abrupt facility closures, contested financial practices, and a leadership style that critics argue prioritizes business considerations over the lived realities of elders and their families. The duality is hard to reconcile: moments of genuine care and community amidst a broader discontent with management decisions and the operational fallout those decisions precipitate. For anyone evaluating Hollander-owned facilities, this collection of perspectives invites careful consideration of both the personal interactions that resident and family members experience in daily care and the structural choices that shape the long arc of an elder's residence, safety, and stability in times of transition.
Hollander Senior Living of Sandy Springs in Atlanta, GA is a vibrant senior living community that offers Respite Care services. Our beautifully designed facility provides a range of amenities to ensure our residents' comfort and enjoyment.
For the convenience of our residents, we have a beauty salon where they can pamper themselves and maintain their grooming needs. Our community-operated transportation service ensures that residents have easy access to nearby attractions and appointments. We also have a computer center where seniors can stay connected with loved ones and engage in online activities.
Mealtimes are a highlight at Hollander Senior Living. Our dining room offers restaurant-style dining with delicious meals prepared by our experienced culinary team. Special dietary restrictions are taken into consideration to accommodate individual needs.
Our community promotes an active lifestyle with various fitness programs available in our fully equipped fitness room. Residents can also enjoy recreational activities in our gaming room or unwind in our beautiful garden or outdoor spaces.
Safety and security are prioritized with 24-hour call systems and supervision provided by our dedicated staff. Assistance with daily living activities such as bathing, dressing, and transfers is readily available for those who need it. Medication management ensures that residents receive the proper medications on time.
To enrich mental wellness, we provide engaging activities including planned day trips, resident-run activities, and scheduled daily activities. Additionally, our mental wellness program focuses on promoting emotional well-being among our residents.
Nearby amenities include two cafes, four parks, 15 pharmacies, three physicians' offices, 11 restaurants, two transportation options, three places of worship, two theaters, and three hospitals.
At Hollander Senior Living of Sandy Springs in Atlanta GA, we strive to create an inclusive community where seniors can thrive while receiving the care they need.
Hollander Senior Living of Sandy Springs is located at 5399 Northland Drive, Ne, Atlanta, GA 30342 in Fulton County, Georgia
Hollander Senior Living of Sandy Springs on seniors.fyi includes 3 photos including images showing bedroom, interior, building, trees, landscaping, architecture, living room, decor, and more.
Hollander Senior Living and Memory Care of Sandy Springs
Atlanta, GA
Hollander Senior Living and Memory Care of Sandy Springs costs
Hollander Senior Living and Memory Care of Sandy Springs reviews
Hollander Senior Living and Memory Care of Sandy Springs images
Mann House Sandy Springs
Atlanta, GA
Pleasant, well-maintained spaces with caring, accessible staff and well-planned activities.
Mann House Sandy Springs costs
Mann House Sandy Springs reviews
Mann House Sandy Springs images
Belmont Village Buckhead
Atlanta, GA
Caring staff in a welcoming environment with engaging activities.
Belmont Village Buckhead costs
Belmont Village Buckhead reviews
Belmont Village Buckhead images
Belmont Village Senior Living Buckhead
Atlanta, GA
Comprehensive memory-care focus with 24/7 supervision and strong on-site amenities.
Belmont Village Senior Living Buckhead reviews
Belmont Village Senior Living Buckhead images
Dunwoody Health And Rehabilitation Center
Atlanta, GA
Dedicated therapy and nursing staff with improved staffing and recent remodels under new management.
Dunwoody Health And Rehabilitation Center reviews
Dunwoody Health And Rehabilitation Center images
Hammond Glen Retirement Community
Atlanta, GA
Warm, active community with diverse activities and attentive staff.
Hammond Glen Retirement Community costs
Hammond Glen Retirement Community reviews
Hammond Glen Retirement Community images
Mount Vernon Village Condominium Association
Atlanta, GA
Friendly staff, vibrant activities, and good value for the location.
Mount Vernon Village Condominium Association costs
Mount Vernon Village Condominium Association reviews
Mount Vernon Village Condominium Association images
Mount Vernon Towers
Atlanta, GA
Warm staff, clean, welcoming atmosphere, and good dining options.
Mount Vernon Towers costs
Mount Vernon Towers reviews
Mount Vernon Towers images
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Medicare does not cover assisted living costs, as it focuses on acute medical needs and short-term care, with exceptions for certain medically necessary services like physical therapy. Individuals must explore other options such as Medicaid, veterans' benefits, or long-term care insurance to manage these expenses effectively.
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Choosing between assisted living and nursing homes involves evaluating emotional and financial factors, with assisted living offering independence and support for daily activities at a lower cost, while nursing homes provide intensive medical care for individuals with significant health needs. The decision is influenced by personal preferences, health status, cognitive function, and varying Medicaid coverage across states.
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Assisted living in 2025 offers a crucial balance of independence and support for seniors, with costs varying from $2,500 to over $7,000 per month based on factors such as location and care level. Understanding pricing complexities, including regional differences and potential hidden fees, is essential for families to plan financially while ensuring quality care for their loved ones.