Sharick's Deck Retirement Rnch

Pros

• They would make a lot of upgrades and changes.
• They hoped the owner would show empathy toward the residents.
• They desire daily healthy, nutritious meals for the residents.

Cons

• The facility is filthy and run-down, with no staff on site.
• It is described as a dump and evokes a sense of neglect.
• The place feels neglected to the point of being unsafe or inappropriate for residents.
• Meals are infrequent and not nutritious, despite the high cost to live there.
• The owner is questioned for not using residents' money to improve the facility.
• There are no daily activities for residents, indicating neglect of their welfare.
• The overall situation is sad and suggests a lack of empathy from the owner toward residents.

Review

A troubling portrait emerges from a group of blunt and alarming observations about a local care facility. Several readers describe a place that feels neglected, unsafe, and neglected to the point of being hard to believe it remains open. The language is harsh and direct: the building is described as filthy and run-down, and one person even equates the conditions to something as grim as a concentration camp. The overarching sense is that neglect isn't just possible here - it's visible in the everyday reality of the place.

Another voice raises the alarm by simply summing up the environment as a "run down place" with "no staff," adding the word "Crazy" as if to underscore how chaotic and unmanaged the scene feels. The impression given is not just of grime or disrepair, but of a facility operating without the basic protections, oversight, or human support residents should expect. This tone - urgent, scattered with exclamations, and emotionally charged - conveys a fear that something serious could go wrong at any moment, and that such conditions might even be endangering the people who live there.

Several reviewers pivot from description to a call for action. One person explicitly requests guidance on where to report what they believe to be mistreatment or neglect, even invoking emergency services by naming 911 as the number to call. That plea reflects a sense of immediacy and helplessness: if what they're describing is true, the people inside could be vulnerable and in need of rapid intervention. The request to direct authorities to the facility is framed not as a rumor but as a concrete step toward helping "victims living inside," whatever their exact circumstances may be.

The concerns extend beyond safety and cleanliness to the quality of daily life within the facility. A prominent thread asks for transparency about meals, urging reviewers and readers to demand a meal calendar and details on the daily healthy meals that are purportedly served. The dissatisfaction is sharp: meals are described as infrequent and far between, casting doubt on whether residents are receiving proper nutrition on a consistent basis. The debate about finances follows closely: questions arise about what the owner is doing with the money - money that should be invested in the care and upkeep of the facility rather than appearing to be diverted elsewhere. This line of critique suggests a perceived misallocation of resources and a lack of accountability.

Care and activities - elements essential to any living environment meant to support well-being - are another major point of contention. Reviewers wonder what daily activities are offered to residents and whether any meaningful opportunities exist for engagement or rehabilitation. The language betrays disappointment and concern: "What daily activities are done there for the residents? I haven't heard of any!" and a worry that activities and supports designed to help people with activities of daily living (ADLs) to "get better" are either absent or insufficient. The absence of or failure to provide basic care routines and supports appears to be a recurring theme, fueling the sense that residents are not receiving the assistance they need to maintain or improve their health and quality of life.

Amid the criticism, there is a human interest thread that reveals the emotional weight behind these observations. One reviewer expresses a poignant wish to co-own the facility themselves, with the belief that they could enact "a LOT of upgrades and changes." The same voice laments the perceived lack of empathy from the current owner toward residents, underscoring a deep frustration that those living there deserve attentive, compassionate care and nutritionally sound meals. This personal reflection adds a layer of longing for reform and accountability, turning the critique from mere complaint into a vision of what better care might look like in practice.

Taken together, these perspectives create a powerful, multi-faceted portrait of concern and urgency. The repeated references to neglect, filth, lack of staff, questionable nutrition, absence of activities, and calls for investigative reporting or intervention all converge on a single conclusion: residents deserve a safer, cleaner, and more compassionate environment, with transparent governance and reliable care. The repeated insistence on reporting to authorities, on demanding meal schedules, and on seeking accountable leadership speaks to a common hope that, with proper oversight and resources, improvements are possible. For anyone connected to this facility, the message is clear: the wellbeing of the residents must be the priority, and it may require outside intervention to ensure they receive the care and respect they deserve.

This part of Plant City, Florida offers a variety of amenities and services that may be appealing to seniors looking for a convenient and comfortable living environment. With several restaurants nearby such as Chick-Fil-A, Village Inn, and Sunrise Eatery, there are plenty of dining options to choose from. Additionally, there are pharmacies like Walgreens and CVS Pharmacy in close proximity for easy access to medication. For healthcare needs, there are physicians offices and hospitals like South Florida Baptist Hospital and AdventHealth Zephyrhills within a short distance. Seniors looking to relax or enjoy outdoor activities can visit parks like Dr Hal & Lynn Brewer Park or Zephyrhills Park Playground & Waterpark. Overall, this part of Plant City provides a range of conveniences and services that cater to the needs of seniors seeking a peaceful and thriving community.

Restaurants

• Chick-Fil-A (6.2 miles)
• The Great Catch - Zephyrhills (8.4 miles)
• Village Inn (8.5 miles)
• McDonald's (8.6 miles)
• Twisty Treat (8.6 miles)
• Los Chicos (9 miles)
• Sunrise Eatery (9.3 miles)

Physicians

• Thomas A Digeronimo (6.4 miles)
• Brandon Eye Associates (6.6 miles)
• Family Medical Specialists of Florida, PLC (6.8 miles)
• Bay Health Center (6.9 miles)
• K Vijapura A MD PA (7.4 miles)
• Health Point Medical Group (8.3 miles)
• Gaffney Barry M (8.6 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (6.6 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (6.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (8.5 miles)
• Winn-Dixie (8.5 miles)
• Walgreens (8.5 miles)
• Walgreens (8.7 miles)
• Winn-Dixie (9.2 miles)

Parks

• Dr Hal & Lynn Brewer Park (7 miles)
• Zephyrhills Park Playground & Waterpark (8.8 miles)
• Mango Dog Park (11.1 miles)
• Wesley Chapel District Park (11.3 miles)

Hospitals

• South Florida Baptist Hospital (7 miles)
• AdventHealth Zephyrhills (9 miles)
• Pioneer Medical Services (10.4 miles)
• Adventist Health Systems Sunbelt (10.4 miles)
• Florida Hospital Zephyrhills Outpatient Services (10.5 miles)
• Simpson Breast Health Solutions (10.5 miles)
• Florida Hospital Zephyrhills Sleep Center (10.6 miles)

Cafes

• Hard Dock Cafe (7.8 miles)
• Saigon Cafe (8.4 miles)
• Little Ninja Thai Japanese Food & Cafe (9 miles)
• Panera Bread (9.5 miles)
• Starbucks (10.3 miles)
• Starbucks (11.6 miles)
• Starbucks (11.9 miles)

Places of Worship

• New Walk Church (8.4 miles)

Transportation

• Zephyrhills Municipal Airport (ZPH) (8.5 miles)

Theaters

• AMC Highwoods 2 (11.6 miles)