Ila Senior Living Costs & Pricing
At Ila Senior Living, the monthly costs for accommodations reflect a competitive pricing structure compared to both Elbert County and the broader state of Colorado. For instance, a semi-private room at Ila is priced at $3,500, which is notably lower than the county average of $3,895 and significantly less than the state average of $4,009. Similarly, residents opting for a private room will find favorable rates; Ila charges $4,000 per month in contrast to Elbert County's average of $4,467 and Colorado's state average of $4,142. These cost advantages highlight Ila Senior Living as an attractive option for seniors seeking quality care without compromising their financial resources.
| Floor plans | Ila Senior Living | Elbert County | Colorado |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,500 | $3,895 | $4,008 |
| Private | $4,000 | $4,467 | $4,142 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$500 / mo
A Loving Hand Assisted Living
$3,000 / month
17.5 miles away
-
About the same
Castle Rock Assisted Living II
$3,600 to $4,100 / month
9.0 miles away
-
About the same
Castle Rock Assisted Living 1
$3,600 to $5,000 / month
9.0 miles away
-
About the same
Auburn View Assisted Living
$3,500 to $5,600 / month
16.5 miles away
-
About the same
Legacy House Elder Care on Berry
$3,500 to $4,000 / month
23.2 miles away
Overall Review of Ila Senior Living
common
4 reviews mention this
Memory care feels personalized
Residents describe memory care staff as attentive and personal.
Several reviewers specifically mention memory care, describing caregivers who were supportive and emotionally present. One family member wrote that staff treated their loved one with compassion and kept care personalized through the progression of Parkinsonâs. Others mention strong individual caregiver actions, while a separate review also criticizes medical attention and daily engagement in the memory care side. Overall, the memory care experience reads mixed, but personal attention is a recurring theme.
common
7 reviews mention this
Clean facilities and common areas
Multiple reviewers highlight the facilityâs cleanliness.
Many reviewers say the building is clean or spotless, including praise for how tidy the space is during visits. A few also mention cleanliness alongside other strengths like caring staff and smooth transitions. Some criticism also appears, including a review describing unsanitary conditions in apartments, and another noting a decline in cleanliness over time. Taken together, cleanliness is often praised, with clear exceptions.
caveat
8 reviews mention this
Food quality is a mixed point
Food satisfaction varies, with some residents unhappy with options.
Food is discussed more than most other topics, with both praise and frustration. Some residents and families say meals are more than adequate and highlight favorites like salmon, while others call the food over-seasoned, heavy, and lacking lighter, healthier options. There are also complaints about meal variety and portions for specific dietary needs, plus one reviewer who felt improvements were not enough to match the cost. At the same time, other reviews still describe the food as above average or simply good.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Costs and fee increases raise concerns
Several reviewers say pricing and fees feel too high.
Pricing comes up as a recurring concern, especially for families who felt annual rent increases and added care fees were excessive. Some reviewers describe the move-in arrangement as expensive relative to what they experienced, while another said costs rose dramatically and quality declined. One review also links the overall value to understaffing and suggests the price is not justified. Even among more balanced takes, one person notes the price feels high.
caveat
4 reviews mention this
Staffing shortages affect response time
Some residents describe understaffing that slowed care.
A few reviewers say staffing levels can be too low at times, with reports of long waits for help and caregivers stretching across roles like activity and housekeeping. There are also concerns about how quickly issues are addressed, including a review describing difficulty getting staff to check on a resident before EMTs arrived. Another reviewer criticizes lack of proper medical treatment and points to understaffing as limiting the care they expected to receive. Other reviews do praise caregivers, but these complaints make staffing a clear point of disagreement.
common
16 reviews mention this
Caregivers are caring and responsive
Caregivers and management are frequently described as kind and responsive.
Across many reviews, families describe staff members as patient, kind, and attentive to residentsâ needs. Several reviewers also mention responsivenessâissues being addressed professionally, or staff taking time to know a residentâs preferences and routines. Some of the most positive comments also include recognition for management and specific team members, along with praise for communication with families. At the same time, a smaller set of reviews raises concerns about staffing and responsiveness, which creates an uneven overall picture.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.