2160 West 236th Street, Torrance, CA 90501
To contact a resident: (310) 326-2868
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
J and A Compassionate Care II Costs & Pricing
J and A Compassionate Care II offers competitive pricing for its services, particularly when compared to the broader market in Los Angeles County and throughout California. For semi-private rooms, the facility charges $2,899 per month, which is significantly lower than the county average of $3,349 and slightly below the state average of $3,333. In terms of private accommodations, J and A Compassionate Care II's rate of $3,900 stands favorably against the county's benchmark of $4,197 and remains reasonable when juxtaposed with California's overall average of $3,939. These cost advantages not only underscore J and A Compassionate Care II's commitment to affordability but also reflect its dedication to providing quality care within a budget-friendly framework for residents.
| Floor plans | J and A Compassionate Care II | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,899 | $3,349 | $3,333 |
| Private | $3,900 | $4,197 | $3,939 |
Overall Review of J and A Compassionate Care II
Pros
The facility was very clean.- The sister had her own room, which was very pleasant.
- The staff are kind, professional, and fantastic, and they care for residents' needs.
- They would definitely recommend it to others.
- The staff communicate well with families and are receptive to questions.
- Residents have three meals a day and can participate in activities such as bingo, exercises, and walks with staff.
Cons
The caregivers at this location are very unprofessional.- One of the caregivers is old enough to be a patient there.
- The second caregiver has a terrible attitude.
- The reviewer would not feel safe leaving a family member there and does not recommend it.
- The owners of the house are also getting old enough to be a patient there and do not check in on the quality of the house services provided.
- The caregivers run it like it’s their own home and do not provide autonomy for the patients.
Review
J and A Compassionate Care II in Torrance is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like setting where private rooms and a straightforward daily routine are the norm, and where the warmth of staff and a personal touch carry real weight in daily care. The community presents itself as clean and well-kept, with residents occupying individual rooms that feel comfortable and homelike. For families prioritizing clear, ongoing communication with caregivers and a predictable meal schedule, this option can offer dependable daily structure. It works best for seniors who prefer a quieter environment, modest activity programming, and a setting that feels intimate rather than sprawling.
That said, certain families should consider alternatives. The reviews surface a tension between charm and consistency, with concerns centered on caregiver professionalism and supervision. If reliable, uniformly high-quality caregiving is non-negotiable, this community may fall short for some residents. Worries about staff boundaries, described as behaviors that treat the home-like setting more like a personal domain than a regulated care environment, echo a desire for firmer oversight and accountability. Additionally, the aging ownership and questions about in-house quality checks suggest a need for options where governance and staffing are clearly structured and transparent.
The strongest positives here lie in the human side of care. Several reviewers applaud staff warmth, kindness, and a genuine willingness to support both residents and their families. When caregivers are described as flexible, receptive, and communicative, the value to families is meaningful: timely updates, responsiveness to questions, and a sense that someone is watching out for evolving needs. The parts of the program that work, private rooms, cleanliness, accessible meals, and a basic menu that provides three daily meals, provide a reliable daily framework that can buttress peace of mind for many families. In practice, these strengths can offset a lot, particularly for residents who do not require aggressive medical management.
Yet the cons, as reported, carry enough weight to temper enthusiasm. The most serious red flag centers on perceived caregiving professionalism: attitudes that feel dismissive or disorganized, and concerns that the home ambiance might undermine formal expectations of care. Autonomy for residents can seem limited, with staff dynamics sometimes described as too informal for a setting that still carries the responsibilities of entrusted elder care. The combination of a small, intimate environment with occasional lapses in professional boundaries can create a mismatch for families seeking strict standardization and rigorous safety checks. The activity level in the community also leans toward modest engagement, which can leave more active residents feeling under-stimulated.
From a practical decision-making standpoint, the key pros and cons must be weighed against the resident’s priorities. If a clean, cozy room, friendly staff, reliable family communication, and a predictable mealtime routine trump the need for highly structured programming or constant clinical oversight, this community remains a reasonable choice. The presence of three meals daily and some organized activities is a tangible benefit for seniors who enjoy routine and light social participation. However, for families where daytime activity levels and staff professionalism are non-negotiable, these positives may not fully offset the concerns about consistency and boundary management. Prospective residents should test these dynamics on a live shift, not just in marketing materials or a single tour.
In the end, J and A Compassionate Care II presents itself as a practical, small-scale option that can deliver comfort and warmth in the right circumstances. It is a sensible match for seniors who prize a home-like feel, private rooms, and dependable communication, and who are comfortable with a more intimate staff dynamic. Families with higher expectations for professional boundaries, proactive safety oversight, and a robust, active program should consider alternatives in the Torrance area that offer more standardized staffing and broader activity options. Before deciding, request current caregiver assignments, inquire about staff training and supervision, and spend time talking with current families about day-to-day experiences. This approach will illuminate whether the community’s strengths align with the resident’s needs or point toward a more suitable fit elsewhere.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Long Beach (Daugherty) (10 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide