1265 Socorro Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
St. Mary's Residential Care Home II Costs & Pricing
St. Mary's Residential Care Home II offers a range of accommodations with pricing tailored to meet diverse needs. For semi-private rooms, the monthly cost is set at $4,000, which slightly exceeds the average rate for Santa Clara County at $3,943 and significantly exceeds the state average of $3,333. Private room options present a broader price spectrum ranging from $4,500 to $7,500, which again positions them above both local and statewide averages - Santa Clara County's private room rate is approximately $4,096, while California's average stands at $3,939. This pricing reflects not only the quality of care and services provided but also the premium environment that St. Mary's aims to cultivate for its residents.
| Floor plans | St. Mary's Residential Care Home II | Santa Clara County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $4,000 | $3,943 | $3,333 |
| Private | $4,500 to $7,500 | $4,096 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of St. Mary's Residential Care Home II
Pros
St Marys 1 and 2 are very clean.
Staff are caring, friendly, and hardworking.
The care at St. Mary’s Residential Care Home is exceptional.
It has been a great experience and is highly recommended.
Evelyn is regarded as the best caregiver.
The facilities include clean spaces and a large common living area.
Cons
Her calls for help were met with slow responses from the staff.
It was a terrible experience for the family.
The reviewer urged others not to recommend this facility.
Review
St. Mary’s Residential Care Home II in Sunnyvale is best suited for seniors who want a clean, intimate, caregiver-driven setting and families that value hands-on attention from a small, dedicated team. The community tends to attract those who prefer a practical, homelike environment over high-volume programming or sprawling campus feeling. With a 4.2/5 rating from multiple reviews, it appeals to families prioritizing reliability, direct caregiver access, and a steady routine rather than resort-like amenities. This is not the choice for those seeking extensive on-site medical clinics or very large, activity-filled communities; it is a calm, manageable option for residents who thrive with personalized, consistent care.
Alternatives are worth considering for families whose priorities lean toward immediate, high-urgency response, expansive social spaces, or robust multilingual staffing. One reviewer noted a lag in response to a call for help, suggesting that non-urgent requests can be slower to handle under pressure. Language dynamics surface as well, with caregivers described as English as a second language, which can complicate communication for some residents and families. The space itself is described variably, some accounts highlight a small common room, while tours reference a larger living area, so families with strong social needs may want to verify current activity programming and room configuration. For residents needing continuous 24/7 clinical oversight or a broad, highly active program, it may be prudent to explore options with fuller staffing and more extensive activity schedules.
On the upside, cleanliness is a consistent strength. Reviews repeatedly praise meticulous upkeep and a care culture that feels genuine, with staff described as caring, friendly, and hardworking. The repeated praise for individual caregivers, notably Evelyn, signals that the human element, consistency, empathy, and getting-to-know-a-resident, drives satisfaction here. For families who prize stable, long-term relationships with caregivers, this is a meaningful offset to occasional slower responses on ad hoc requests. Night coverage exists, with a small team on duty, offering reassurance that someone is watching over residents in the evenings and late into the night. Taken together, the core advantages, cleanliness, a warm caregiver environment, and the potential for strong, personal connections, form a compelling case for those who value a home-like pace over larger-scale operation.
Practical decision guidance centers on the caregiving relationships and the facility’s footprint. The recurring spotlight on Evelyn suggests that the defining experience hinges on which caregiver is assigned and how consistently staffing is kept on a resident’s schedule. Families should request to meet top caregivers, and inquire about the likelihood of stable assignments so the same aides and nurses support their loved one. For residents who value quiet, uncluttered spaces, the small common room can be a comfortable retreat; however, those who crave frequent social engagement should confirm what activities are offered and how often they occur, given the space and staffing constraints. Language support matters; if clear, timely updates are essential, verify staffing coverage across shifts and the facility’s capacity to provide bilingual communication as needed.
Operationally, the facility’s footprint and upkeep are tangible strengths. The presence of three bathrooms suggests practical convenience for a smaller home, and the overall cleanliness paired with positive long-term resident sentiment points to steady, predictable daily life. Yet the trade-offs are visible: limited common space and a lean night shift can translate to slower handling of multiple simultaneous needs or events. For families weighing options, this means balancing the serene, home-like cadence against the realities of lean staffing and potential language barriers. If medical complexity or the need for rapid, continuous clinical intervention is higher on the priority list, it is prudent to compare with facilities that maintain larger clinical teams and more robust 24/7 access.
Bottom line: St. Mary’s Residential Care Home II serves a specific niche well, the senior who wants a clean, attentive, home-like setting with genuinely engaged caregivers and modest social spaces. The strongest pros, pristine upkeep, a caring staff culture, and the possibility of forming bonds with standout caregivers like Evelyn, tend to offset the main drawbacks of a small facility, provided expectations align with staffing realities and language dynamics. Families planning a focused tour should press to meet multiple caregivers, confirm consistency of assignments, and probe response times and language supports before deciding. For those prioritizing intimate, dependable daily life with personal attention, St. Mary’s II is a solid, practical fit; for others needing rapid responsiveness or expansive programming, exploring alternatives will likely yield better alignment.














Memory Care Pathways: A Holistic Guide to Dementia Support
Comprehending Evening Confusion in Dementia: Causes, Manifestations, and Support
Delirium and Dementia: Unraveling the Key Differences