1176 Bryson Avenue, Simi Valley, CA 93065
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Simi Valley Residential Care V Costs & Pricing
Simi Valley Residential Care V offers competitive pricing for its residential care services compared to the broader Ventura County and California averages. For semi-private rooms, the monthly rate is $3,200, which is notably lower than both the county average of $3,438 and the state average of $3,333. Studio accommodations are priced at $3,800, aligning closely with Ventura's average of $4,021 and slightly below California's statewide average of $4,145. The one-bedroom option also reflects similar competitiveness at $3,800 against Ventura County's higher average of $4,513 and California's state median of $4,340. Lastly, private rooms at Simi Valley Residential Care V are offered at $3,800 as well; while this is on par with California's average of $3,939, it remains lower than Ventura County's average price of $4,082. Overall, Simi Valley Residential Care V presents an attractive choice for those seeking quality care within a budget-conscious framework in this region.
| Floor plans | Simi Valley Residential Care V | Ventura County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,200 | $3,438 | $3,333 |
| Studio | $3,800 | $4,021 | $4,145 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,800 | $4,513 | $4,340 |
| Private | $3,800 | $4,082 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$300 / mo
Paradise Senior Living 1
$3,500 to $4,500 / month13.3 miles away -
from -$450 / mo
Dignity Care Home 1
$2,750 to $4,150 / month17.0 miles away -
from +$600 / mo
America's Care Manor
$3,800 to $4,000 / month6.0 miles away -
from +$300 / mo
California Senior Of Sherman Oaks
$3,500 to $4,000 / month19.9 miles away -
from -$200 / mo
Navita Residence Edgemont Drive
$3,000 / month15.3 miles away
Overall Review of Simi Valley Residential Care V
Cons
They don't really have many activities unless you count watching television.- The food is rather repetitive.
- They can only cook certain things that everybody can eat.
- They didn't have a good feeling.
- They lacked passion and love for residents.
- They don't seem to offer activities or music.
- They seemed to be putting on a show.
Review
Simi Valley Residential Care V is best suited for seniors who want a modest, inexpensive, low-maintenance option in Simi Valley and can live with a quiet, predictable routine rather than a vibrant social calendar. It serves residents who prioritize straightforward custodial care over activity-rich programming or culinary variety. The setting appears to be aimed at providing essential daily supervision in a simple, no-frills environment rather than delivering a dynamic, engaging lifestyle for residents who thrive on constant stimulation.
Those weighing alternatives should note that this community may feel inadequate for active or socially oriented seniors. Families seeking robust daily programming, diverse eatings, or staff who consistently demonstrate warmth and genuine engagement should definitely consider other options. A preference for authentic connection with caregivers, rather than appearances or perfunctory interactions, is a critical criterion here. If the priority is meaningful, ongoing activity and music-based or creative programming, this facility is unlikely to satisfy.
The most evident drawbacks center on the activity and engagement shortfalls. Reviews describe scant programming beyond television, with residents unlikely to encounter meaningful opportunities for social interaction or stimulation. The meals are called repetitive, suggesting limited menu variety and culinary flexibility, which can quickly undermine satisfaction for residents with specific tastes or dietary needs. Additionally, there is persistent concern about whether staff truly connect with residents or merely perform routine tasks, leaving families wondering if care is delivered with warmth and attentiveness.
On the flip side, there is a faint indication that a basic level of structure and supervision exists, which may be tolerable for residents who do not demand high-energy programming. One reviewer gave a 4-star rating, signaling that at least some individuals find value in the facility despite the general consensus. Still, this minority view does not substantially offset the dominant issues: without authentic warmth or engaging activities, the day-to-day quality of life hinges on personal expectations and tolerance for a quiet, minimal-stimulation environment. For most families, that imbalance makes this community a secondary choice at best.
To make a well-informed decision, prospective visitors should prioritize concrete, firsthand confirmation of programming during tours. Ask for a current activity calendar, frequency of social events, and whether activities extend beyond passive TV viewing. Inquire about dining options, menu rotation, and the ability to accommodate dietary restrictions or preferences. Observe staff interactions with residents: do caregivers initiate conversations, offer assistance with meaningful tasks, and demonstrate patience and genuine concern, or do they appear to be executing a chore list? Request specifics about caregiver-to-resident ratios, and request opportunities to meet potential caregivers who would be assigned to the resident. A trial stay, if offered, can reveal whether the atmosphere aligns with expectations for warmth, engagement, and daily structure.
In summary, this community functions as a straightforward, budget-conscious choice for seniors who are content with a quiet atmosphere but should not be relied upon for active social programming or varied dining experiences. Families with a priority on sustained engagement, authentic caregiver connections, and creative activities will want to explore alternatives. If affordability or location is the primary constraint, conduct rigorous comparisons with other nearby facilities that demonstrate stronger evidence of resident-centered programming and staff warmth. The final decision should hinge on whether the expected daily life aligns with the resident’s personality, preferences, and care needs, with a clear preference for environments that offer meaningful interaction and diverse, dependable programming.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena (25 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Homelike setting with comprehensive care and diabetes-friendly dining.
8 Important Indicators That Memory Care May Be Necessary
Delving into the Inner World of Dementia: Insights into Thoughts and Awareness
Five Subtle Dementia Indicators to Observe: An In-Depth Guide to Understanding “Does My Mom Have Dementia?”