5707 Flowering Meadow Court, San Jose, CA 95135
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Evergreen Residential Care Home
Cons
The reviewer asserts the apartments are not for people; only cats live there.- The reviewer describes the place as horrible, noting a caregiver who never called the owner, the daughter, or 911 after the mother fell.
- The reviewer states the mother sustained a fractured pelvis and that no one informed the owner, the daughter, or 911.
- The reviewer claims the owner said the hired help had lied and did not relay the incident to anyone.
- The reviewer alleges the owner picked the mother up, placed her in bed, and did not say a word to anyone.
Review
Evergreen Residential Care Home in San Jose appears best suited for seniors seeking a modest, home-like setting with a pet-friendly angle and minimal expectations for high-touch care. It is not positioned as a robust medical or highly monitored environment. For families needing reliable, 24/7 supervision, prompt emergency response, or a clearly documented care plan with licensed oversight, this option should not be the first choice. The blunt takeaway from the available feedback is that the setting may offer comfort in a simple, apartment-style vibe, but it falls short on essential safety and accountability measures that most families require.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families prioritizing safety, transparent operations, and consistent caregiver communication. Licensed assisted living communities with clear staffing policies, formal incident reporting, and dedicated on-site management are more appropriate when the priority is dependable responses to falls, health changes, or urgent needs. In San Jose, there are facilities with structured emergency protocols, documented staff training, and a track record of timely notifications to family members, criteria that Evergreen currently struggles to meet based on the reviews.
A potential upside that can be drawn from the setting is the possibility of a simple, private-feeling environment where residents may enjoy an independent-leaning arrangement and, for cat lovers, a pet-friendly policy. If a resident values a less institutional atmosphere and does not require intensive supervision, this kind of arrangement can feel comfortable and unobtrusive. However, these minor conveniences are dramatically undercut by the more critical realities raised in the feedback: a lack of timely care responses, ambiguities about who is responsible for call-outs, and questions about the honesty and reliability of staff.
The core cons are severe and feed directly into risk: a failure to secure prompt medical attention after a fall, disputes over responsibility between caregivers and ownership, and a pattern of poor communication with family members. One report details a serious fall with a fractured pelvis that went unacknowledged for a troubling period, with claims that the owner minimized the incident and did not notify the family or emergency services. Such experiences point to fundamental gaps in supervision, accountability, and emergency readiness, gaps that no benign attributes can justify.
In weighing the pros against the cons, the protective factors introduced by a home-like, pet-affirming environment do not withstand the weight of the safety and accountability concerns. The idea of a cozy, low-key setting is overwhelmed by credible concerns about resident welfare, responsiveness, and transparency. For decision-makers, the prudent conclusion is to deprioritize Evergreen in favor of options with proven safety records, clearly defined caregiving standards, and open lines of communication with families. The right choice will balance a comfortable living atmosphere with rigorous risk management and dependable, documented care.
To move forward decisively, use a structured due-diligence approach. During visits, demand a visible staffing plan with ratios and on-site coverage hours, and request to speak with current caregivers about their responsibilities and supervision. Insist on a written incident-report protocol and a recent state survey outcome, plus a clear process for family notifications after accidents or health changes. Ask how falls are prevented, how med management is handled, and how emergency services are coordinated. Check references with multiple families, and compare with nearby licensed facilities that offer transparent reporting, stronger emergency responsiveness, and verifiable safety records. In San Jose, several communities provide this level of assurance; Evergreen’s two unfavorable reviews make the need for thorough evaluation nonnegotiable.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
San Jose International (11 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Competitive, clearly disclosed pricing across semi-private, private, and studio options in Santa Clara County.
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.
An Extensive Exploration of the VA Aid and Attendance Benefit