1363 5th Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94122
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Julie's Care Home Costs & Pricing
At Julie's Care Home, the monthly cost for a semi-private room is set at $3,500, which positions it competitively within the broader landscape of care options. When compared to San Francisco County, where similar accommodations average around $3,979, Julie's Care Home offers a more affordable alternative for families seeking quality care. Additionally, this pricing remains in line with the state average of $3,333 for California, indicating that while Julie's rates are slightly above the state norm, they provide residents with an exceptional value considering the personalized services and welcoming environment offered. This balance of cost and care highlights Julie's commitment to providing both affordability and quality support in a challenging market.
| Floor plans | Julie's Care Home | San Francisco County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,500 | $3,979 | $3,333 |
Overall Review of Julie's Care Home
Pros
The care home owner moved the brother to her care home, relieving the family of multiple trips between homes.- The owner and her husband use their van to assist with transportation.
- She takes responsibility for meeting the resident's medical appointments.
- The sister moving to Julie's Care Home receives more personal attention and responds well.
- The director is friendly and hospitable and knows the residents well.
- Outdoor spaces are handicap accessible and regular activities are hosted.
- Chinese cuisine is served regularly.
Cons
They are hung up on when trying to contact the facility for information.- They have called three times and find this ridiculous.
- They would never recommend this place to anyone.
- There are only two caregivers for about 8-9 residents.
- Parking near the home is very difficult.
- The bathroom is not ideal.
- Care may not be enough.
Review
This community is best suited for families seeking an exceptionally intimate, owner-led setting in San Francisco where care decisions are practically hand-delivered and medical appointments are actively coordinated. Julie’s Care Home operates with a small resident census and a hands-on style that rewards personal familiarity: staff who recognize each person, a director who appears accessible, and a routine that emphasizes individual attention. The configuration favors residents who respond well to a close-knit environment, and the physical layout supports ease of daily living on the accessible lower level. In short, this is a home where relationships and coordination matter more than volume or impersonal systems.
Yet this is not a fit for every family. If robust, predictable oversight and fortress-like safety infrastructure are non-negotiable, alternatives should be on the table. Administrative responsiveness looms large here, with multiple anecdotes of being repeatedly unable to reach the administrator by phone. Transportation is limited to doctor visits, and there is no formal expectation of escorted outings. The lean staffing model, two caregivers for roughly eight to nine residents, with 14 residents supported by two full-time and one part-time staff, raises legitimate questions about response times, assistance speed, and consistent supervision, especially during evenings and weekends.
The strongest positives center on proximity, personalization, and practical caregiving. The owner’s willingness to relocate a loved one to her care home and to take on the burden of coordinating medical appointments stands out as a concrete advantage; it can dramatically reduce the logistical strain on families living far away. A friendly, hospitable director who knows residents well translates into genuine, daily warmth and attentive listening. The setting appears clean, with handicap-accessible outdoor spaces and a calendar of activities that keeps residents engaged. Regular meals, three times daily with diverse options including Chinese cuisine, support routine nutrition, while staff involvement in medication management ensures a medical touch without constant parent oversight.
However, safety and reliability gaps temper these strengths. Physical safety is notably inconsistent: there are 1.5 bathrooms for six to seven residents downstairs, with no grab bars noted in key areas, and stairs within the home as well as a hillside location that can complicate mobility and fall risk. Emergency measures feel uneven, described as being near the door rather than bed-side, which can create hesitation during overnight hours or urgent moments. Transportation is limited to doctor visits, and the possibility of residents leaving unescorted, if deemed appropriate, introduces an extra layer of risk for those who require closer supervision. These structural and operational gaps can offset the warmth and convenience that define the community.
For families weighing a decision, practical steps can tilt the balance toward a well-informed choice. Schedule time to meet the administrator face-to-face and request a written care schedule that outlines who provides what level of support and when. Seek concrete details on staffing coverage after hours and during weekends, and ask to see the most recent safety updates or plans for adding features like grab bars or additional bathrooms. Request references from current residents or families, and confirm how care plans are developed and updated. A trial stay or specific milestones for reassessment can help ensure expectations align with day-to-day reality.
In the end, Julie’s Care Home offers a rare, human-scale option in a city where many facilities feel impersonal. For families prioritizing personalized attention, immediate assistance with medical logistics, and a warm, responsive director, this community can be a strong fit, provided the buyer accepts lean staffing ratios and the described safety gaps as the trade-off for intimate, hands-on care. For those who cannot compromise on reliable admin communication, robust safety infrastructure, and tightly controlled supervision, alternatives with larger teams, clearer protocols, and more formal oversight will likely serve better. The decision hinges on balancing the value of personal attention and ease of medical coordination against the nonnegotiable needs for safety, accessibility, and dependable administrative communication.
14 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
San Francisco International (11 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
