4531 Waterstone Drive, Roseville, CA 95747
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Greening's Care Home II Costs & Pricing
Greening's Care Home II offers competitive pricing for its services, particularly when compared to both Placer County and the broader California market. For a semi-private room, Greening's charges $2,800 per month, which is significantly lower than the county average of $3,489 and the state average of $3,333. Similarly, the monthly cost for a private room at Greening's is $3,500, which remains more affordable than both the county rate of $4,026 and the statewide figure of $3,939. This pricing structure reflects Greening's commitment to providing quality care at accessible rates while ensuring residents receive the necessary support in a comfortable environment.
| Floor plans | Greening's Care Home II | Placer County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,800 | $3,489 | $3,333 |
| Private | $3,500 | $4,026 | $3,939 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Greening's Care Home II
Pros
The care at the community is really good.
The staff has been very caring and helpful.
They have been helpful with residents' needs at mealtimes.
The community is clean and consistently well maintained.
They would recommend the community for the great care and value offered.
The location is excellent, in the same complex as the reviewerâs home.
The owner and her husband are wonderful and show genuine passion for the residents.
Cons
They could do a better job keeping the facility clean.
There are not really any activities to keep the residents active.
The food is not very good at all.
The staff could definitely do a better job.
The residents seemed lifeless.
The rent starts at 2900 to start.
The bathrooms had an odor.
The distance from the room to the bathroom was too long.
It was not the right place for her.
Review
Greeningâs Care Home II in Roseville is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like environment where residents receive highly personal attention and staff know them by name. This community leans into caregiver presence over institutional polish, making it a strong fit for an elder who thrives on hands-on support at meals, daily routines, and daily reassurance from a consistently warm staff. It also represents a practical choice for families watching the budget, since the starting rent sits in the mid-three-thousands range while the perceived value centers on individualized care rather than flashy amenities.
Those considering alternatives should note several red flags for particular needs. If a resident thrives on a robust activity calendar, frequent social programming, or a highly varied, appealing menu, this may not be the best match. Cleanliness and upkeep can be inconsistent, and the dining experience has drawn complaints, so families prioritizing pristine environments and restaurant-quality meals should look elsewhere. Additionally, one review highlights a gender mismatch concern, implying the setting might not be suitable for a female resident seeking a long-term living arrangement; this is a critical factor for any family to confirm before deciding.
On the positive side, the strongest argument for Greeningâs Care Home II rests with the care quality delivered by its staff. Reviews repeatedly praise the warmth, helpfulness, and attentiveness of caregivers, particularly around meal support and daily needs. The owners, an engaged couple, are described as passionate about residents, which translates into a hands-on, family-driven vibe that can feel reassuring for families who want visible leadership and accountability. The environment can feel clean and well-maintained when upkeep is active, and for families who value a direct, home-floor experience over corporate polish, this can be a meaningful comfort.
The most persistent drawbacks temper that warmth: cleanliness is not consistently maintained, and the facility misses opportunities to stimulate residents with activities. The absence of a strong activities program leaves some residents under-stimulated, which matters for memory support and overall engagement. Food quality is another recurring concern, with meals described as not very good by multiple reviewers. Layout and logistics also show friction: one review notes a bathroom-to-room distance that may be impractical, and odors in the bathrooms detract from the otherwise homey feel. These factors collectively narrow the audience to those who can tolerate or overlook these operational gaps in exchange for closer caregiver contact.
Those pros partially offset the cons where family members prioritize attentive, reliable caregiving and a genuine, owner-involved environment. The intimate scale and consistent staff presence can yield meaningful daily reassurance and a sense of belonging that larger facilities often struggle to provide. The locationâs convenience, being part of a complex where families already reside nearby, facilitates frequent visits and hands-on involvement, which can significantly improve quality of life for some residents. When a budget-conscious choice is needed, and the expectation is sincere, day-to-day caregiving rather than resort-style living, these factors can outweigh the less robust activities and meal shortcomings.
For families weighing options, the prudent path is to approach Greeningâs Care Home II with specific, non-negotiable questions. Seek a clear plan for improving cleanliness and housekeeping routines, a concrete and engaging activities schedule, and a sample weekly menu to evaluate whether culinary offerings can meet expectations. Verify the residentâs gender suitability and confirm whether the facility accommodates a female resident comfortably and safely, given the cited comment about gender. Finally, request a tour oriented around practical concerns: distance from rooms to bathrooms, odor control measures, and the actual daily cadence of care, meals, and recreation. If these factors align with the residentâs needs and the familyâs expectations, the setting can be a solid, compassionate choice; if not, alternatives with more robust programming, stronger cleanliness standards, and higher meal quality should be pursued.











Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs