148 Stoney Hill Drive, Folsom, CA 95630
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Folsom Care Costs & Pricing
Folsom Care presents a higher pricing structure for its services compared to both Sacramento County and the broader California state averages. Specifically, the monthly cost for a semi-private room at Folsom Care is $4,000, which exceeds the county's average of $3,106 and the state average of $3,333. For those seeking a private room, Folsom Care's rate stands at $5,000, noticeably higher than Sacramento County's average of $3,686 and California's average of $3,939. While these rates reflect the premium services and care offered by Folsom Care, potential residents should consider their budget in relation to these local and state comparisons when evaluating their options in senior care facilities.
| Floor plans | Folsom Care | Sacramento County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $4,000 | $3,106 | $3,333 |
| Private | $5,000 | $3,686 | $3,939 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Folsom Care
Pros
The facility is receptive to family needs.
The staff are wonderful.
The staff were wonderful during Covid.
It is an excellent community for care.
The facility is always clean and well maintained.
The meals are home cooked.
Angelita is upbeat and kind.
Cons
The suggested activities for ALZ patients didn't work for him.
They did not have a lot of activities, and there was a wish for more engagement for residents.
The care home was a little more expensive than what their loved one could afford.
Review
Folsom Care in Folsom, California is best suited for families seeking a warm, responsive caregiving environment where daily routine, personal attention, and home-style meals take priority over elaborate programming. The community shines for residents who need dependable personal care and for relatives who want open lines of communication with a team that listens and adapts to family input. It works well for seniors who value a clean, well-maintained setting and a staff that makes an effort to create a sense of belonging in a smaller, home-like atmosphere. Those who want a high-energy activities calendar or specialized dementia programming should look elsewhere, as the pace here leans toward steady care over high-frequency engagement.
Alternatives are worth considering for two clear reasons. First, families seeking a robust activity line-up, especially tailored for memory care, may find the offerings here too limited. Several reviews note a lack of structured activities and skepticism about the fit of Alzheimerās-specific programming, indicating that residents who thrive on constant stimulation or highly customized cognitive programming may not get their needs fully met. Second, price matters for many families. While the facility earns praise for care quality, one reviewer flagged the cost as a constraint relative to what could be afforded, suggesting that budget-conscious families should compare options to avoid overextending resources.
On the positive side, the core strengths here are real and consistent. Staff responsiveness to family needs stands out, with caregivers described as wonderful and attentive. The environment earns praise for cleanliness and upkeep, reinforcing a sense of safety and dignity for residents. Meals are a standout feature, home-cooked fare that residents seem to enjoy, contributing to comfort and daily satisfaction. Personal care is described as solid, with caregivers taking good steps to maintain residentsā dignity and comfort. These factors collectively create a reliable, reassuring daily experience, even when programming isnāt expansive.
The main drawbacks are manageable but meaningful. The limited activity slate, especially for residents with Alzheimerās or dementia, can leave some days feeling under-stimulating. One reviewer specifically noted that suggested activities did not fit a loved oneās needs, underscoring a potential mismatch between resident interests and available programs. The affordability concern compounds this, as some families may struggle to justify the price without a correspondingly robust activity schedule or broader service mix. In short, the strengths protect the day-to-day quality of care, but they donāt fully compensate for a lighter enrichment calendar or tighter budget flexibility.
When the pros offset the cons, Folsom Care becomes a compelling choice for a caregiver-focused, comfort-oriented option. The care teamās receptiveness and the personal touch from staff, especially evident in anecdotes about compassionate care for spouses and aging parents, can make up for a less dynamic activity program. The home-like environment and consistent cleanliness contribute to a sense of security that matters as much as anything else, and strong meals support overall well-being. For families that prize dependable day-to-day care, clear communication, and a respectful, homelike setting, the trade-offs are often worth it.
The practical takeaway is clear: this community is a solid match for those prioritizing consistent caregiving, warmth, and routine over expansive activity schedules or budget flexibility. Families should confirm current activity options and ask about dementia-specific programming if those needs exist, then compare pricing carefully against alternatives with more robust enrichment or lower cost. If memory-care engagement and affordability are decisive factors, exploring other facilities with stronger dementia programming or more aggressive pricing may be warranted. For families who place a premium on responsive staff, clean surroundings, and home-cooked meals delivered with dignity, Folsom Care stands out as a trustworthy, capable option.












Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained