Christopher Homes of West Helena

Pros

• The visits were quiet and pleasant.
• The atmosphere during visits was calm and pleasant.

Cons

• The reviewer claims the landlord is responsible for any paperwork that isn't filed, not the tenant, implying fault on the landlord's side.
• They allege that the managers knew about the dog for two years and didn't ask for the necessary paperwork, which the reviewer views as negligence.
• They state that the dog's accidental urination on the sidewalk is not a lease violation, pushing back against accusations.
• They argue that being angry about rights violations and expressing it in dialogue is not a lease violation, asserting a right to feel.
• They threaten to sue for discrimination and retaliation, indicating intent to pursue legal action.
• They call the situation "trash" and warn that the other party should be prepared to pay the reviewer or a competent attorney.
• They imply the property is a senior set of duplexes (must be 62), suggesting age-based discrimination.

Review

The account presents a tenant's perspective in which the central complaint is a breakdown in the expected responsibilities of a property owner and management team. The narrator insists that the landlord bears the burden of handling paperwork that is required by policy or law, not the tenant. In their view, the onus should be clearly communicated: if a form or filing is necessary, the landlord or managers ought to specify it and arrange for completion. Without that direction, the tenant feels set up to be blamed for any lapse, even when the fault lies in unclear processes rather than any personal misstep.

A striking element of the narrative is the history of dog ownership at the property. The dog in question has lived there for two years, and the managers were aware of this ongoing situation. Yet, according to the tenant, they never asked for the appropriate paperwork concerning the dog. The tenant asserts that if such a request had been made, they would have complied. This is framed not as a violation of any lease term but as a failure of the management to ask for what was needed, which the tenant sees as a missed responsibility on the part of the landlord.

The issue of the dog's behavior is addressed with careful nuance. The dog allegedly "accidently pees on the sidewalk on his way to his poop area," an incident the tenant explicitly argues is not a lease violation. The broader claim is that the dog's actions do not constitute harassment or "tormenting" other residents, and thus should not be used to justify punitive measures or complaints. The speaker appears intent on separating normal pet behavior from policy violations, urging readers to understand that not every animal-related incident merits the same treatment or response as a lease breach.

A recurring theme is the protection of personal rights and the right to express dissatisfaction. The tenant contends that being angry about perceived rights violations and voicing that anger through respectful dialogue is not itself a lease violation. The implication is that these expressions of concern are legitimate and should be treated as part of a constructive conversation rather than as grounds for retaliation or punitive action. In this framing, anger and advocacy become essential tools of accountability, rather than offenses to the living standards or the management's authority.

The tone of the piece reaches a more confrontational pitch as it moves toward potential legal avenues. The tenant warns of impending litigation, claiming discrimination and retaliation as the core charges to be pursued in court. The rhetoric suggests a readiness to pursue compensation through legal channels, either directly or via counsel, should the landlord or management continue to be perceived as violating rights or engaging in retaliatory practices. The language emphasizes a belief that legal recourse is both appropriate and necessary to rectify what the tenant views as systemic unfairness.

Despite the strong disagreements embedded in the narrative, there are moments that contrast with the grievance-loaded sections. The reviewer notes that during visits, the atmosphere was quite and pleasant, a detail that serves to illustrate a complex, perhaps inconsistent experience of living in the property. This juxtaposition hints at a property that can be agreeable in certain inputs while remaining deeply problematic in others, depending on the interaction, time, and the specific manager or circumstance involved. It underscores the complexity of tenant-landlord dynamics, where mood, management style, and communication gaps can color the overall impression.

Finally, the reviewer identifies the property as a "senior set of duplexes" and asserts that it must be 62 or older. This claim frames the living environment within a particular demographic context, suggesting that age restrictions and senior housing policies should consistently shape how rules are applied and how paperwork is requested. The insistence on age-based expectations closes the piece with a reminder that governance of such properties hinges on clear, fair procedures that account for both tenant realities and legal obligations. The overall narrative thus blends frustration, a call for accountability, and a readiness to pursue remedies, painting a portrait of a tenant who believes that the path to a harmonious living situation depends on consistent, proactive administration and a more attentive regard for residents' rights and concerns.

Pharmacies

• Walmart Pharmacy (0.4 miles)
• Epic Pharmacies (0.6 miles)
• Good Neighbor Pharmacy (2.7 miles)
• Hickory Hill Pharmacy (2.7 miles)
• Economy Drugs of Helena (4.6 miles)
• Dean's Pharmacy (16.2 miles)
• Tunica Pharmacy (18 miles)

Restaurants

• Taco Bell (0.4 miles)
• Npc International (0.4 miles)
• Burger Shack (0.9 miles)
• Roadkill Grill (1 miles)
• The Fish Market (1.3 miles)
• Wendy's (2.1 miles)
• Downtown Bar & Grill (4.6 miles)

Places of Worship

• General Conference Of Seventh-Day Adventists (0.6 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (0.9 miles)
• True Vine Baptist Church (0.9 miles)
• First Missionary Baptist (1.1 miles)
• First Baptist Church (1.1 miles)
• Power House Church of God In Christ (1.1 miles)
• Miracle Temple of Deliverance (1.3 miles)

Physicians

• Pillow Clinic (2.7 miles)
• Bailey Family Practice Pa (3 miles)
• Delta Dermatology (3.4 miles)
• Bell Winston Clinic (4.3 miles)
• Aaron E Henry Community Health Services Center (18 miles)
• Aaron E Henry Community Health Services Center (19 miles)
• Family First (24.9 miles)

Hospitals

• Jessica L Pillow M.D. (3.8 miles)

Transportation

• Helena Cab Co. (3.9 miles)
• Tunica County Cab Co. (18.8 miles)
• Tunica Air Center (19.5 miles)
• Tunica Airport (UTA) (19.5 miles)

Parks

• Court Square Park (4.6 miles)
• Mississippi River State Park (10.7 miles)
• Mississippi River State Park (14.1 miles)

Cafes

• Jeffcoats Downtown Deli (18.1 miles)