Le'Feather HomeCare

Pros

• The company is considered one of the best home health providers the reviewer has worked with.
• The clinicians are reliable and communicate very well.
• Mrs. Jerrie Daniels is professional and knowledgeable about the business.
• Mrs. Jerrie Daniels was available when further assistance was needed.
• The company is described as the absolute best in Arkansas and is expected to expand to other locations.

Cons

• The company never shows up.
• The providers are unreliable and do not communicate schedule changes with clients or providers.
• The service is overall unreliable.
• The reviewer warns potential clients to not use this company.
• One reviewer would give them zero stars.

Review

The feedback about this home health company runs the full gamut, presenting a striking contrast between glowing praise and sharp disapproval. On one end of the spectrum, a reviewer paints a picture of an exceptionally well-run operation, where clinicians are dependable, communication is strong, and leadership sets a commendable tone. On the other end, several voices express deep frustration, describing missed visits, poor scheduling, and a willingness to caution others against using the service. Taken together, the comments reveal a service that can feel transformative in the right circumstances, yet can fall short in others, leaving a mixed reputation that makes the patient experience highly variable.

In the most favorable account, the reviewer emphasizes a level of reliability that feels almost rare in home health care. Clinicians are described as very reliable, delivering care consistently and in a manner that inspires confidence. Communication is highlighted as a strong point, with the reviewer noting that information flows clearly and promptly - an essential factor when coordinating in-home services. A standout feature in this perspective is the leadership. The owner, Mrs. Jerrie Daniels, is singled out as professional and knowledgeable about the business, suggesting a leadership presence that reassures clients and families. The reviewer adds that Mrs. Daniels was available when needed for further assistance, a detail that underscores a hands-on approach and a commitment to addressing concerns. The overarching impression from this view is that the company stands out as a top-tier option within Arkansas, with the potential to expand to other locations, signaling growth and confidence in the model and its execution.

That same review also hints at a broader trust in the people behind the service - the clinicians who actually deliver the care and the owner who oversees the operation. The sense is that when the system operates smoothly, the care team can deliver dependable service, and the leadership structure feels accessible and accountable. For families navigating health needs at home, this combination of reliable field staff and an engaged, informed owner can translate into peace of mind, a rare but highly valued outcome in the realm of home health services. It's a portrait of what strong, customer-focused care can look like when all the moving parts align.

But the sentiment is sharply divided by other voices that describe a dramatically different reality. One reviewer voices such frustration that they would award zero stars if possible, asserting that the company never shows up. The accusation isn't merely about occasional delays; it paints a picture of chronic absenteeism that disrupts the care plan and undermines trust. The reviewer goes further, suggesting that the decision to engage the company was driven by a need for an aide, implying that the very reason for the relationship existed only because care was required in the first place. The language is charged and blunt, using a strong directive for others to reconsider their involvement with the provider by insisting that the company is not fulfilling its basic duties.

A separate, emphatic warning reinforces the negative stance, asserting outright, "DO NOT USE THIS COMPANY!" The core complaints here center on unreliability and poor communication, particularly around schedule changes. The reviewer accuses the company of failing to keep clients or providers properly informed when plans shift, which can create cascading problems for families coordinating multiple care needs, appointments, and in-home services. The recurring thread in these criticisms is a perception of inconsistency - when some visits occur as expected, others do not, and the chain of communication breaks down at crucial moments, leaving clients uncertain and frustrated.

What emerges from juxtaposing these reviews is a portrait of a service whose strengths and weaknesses are highly context-dependent. In some cases, the combination of dependable clinicians and an engaged owner appears to deliver a high-quality, trustworthy experience that families value and praise. In other cases, the same organization is described as unreliable, with missed visits and fragile communication that erode confidence and disrupt care. This contrast highlights how essential reliability and clear, proactive communication are in home health care, where the stakes involve safety, continuity of care, and the well-being of patients.

For potential clients and their families, the takeaway is nuanced. The company may offer a model of care that, under the right circumstances, can be exemplary - anchored by competent clinicians and a professional leadership figure. However, there are clear warnings from other users about missed visits and insufficient communication regarding schedule changes. Before engaging, it would be prudent to have direct conversations about availability, scheduling preferences, and expectations for communication. It may also be wise to ask for references from current clients in your area, request a written care plan with explicit visit times, and confirm how scheduling changes are communicated and who the point of contact will be. In short, while the company has demonstrated the potential for excellent service, prospective clients should enter with a clear understanding of the variability in experiences and a plan to safeguard against the issues raised in the negative reviews.

Restaurants

• Capital Bar and Grill (0.3 miles)
• Samantha's Tap Room & Wood Grill (0.4 miles)
• Cantina Cinco De Mayo (0.4 miles)
• Three Fold Noodles and Dumpling Co. (0.5 miles)
• Copper Grill (0.5 miles)
• Flying Saucer (0.5 miles)
• Agāsi 7 Rooftop Bar and Kitchen (0.5 miles)

Parks

• Riverfront Park (0.5 miles)
• Little Rock Central High School Visitor Center Park (1.4 miles)
• Allsopp Park (2.5 miles)
• Burns Park (4.4 miles)

Cafes

• Mugs Cafe (0.9 miles)
• The Root Cafe (1 miles)
• Fidel & Co. (1.2 miles)
• Mylo Coffee Co. (2.8 miles)
• Starbucks (3.7 miles)

Hospitals

• Arkansas Children's Hospital (0.9 miles)
• Arkansas Childrens Hospital- NICU (1 miles)
• Arkansas Federation Of Families For Children's Mental Health (2.7 miles)
• CHI St Vincent Infirmary (3.6 miles)
• Baptist Health Medical Center (3.9 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.1 miles)
• Cornerstone Pharmacy Main (1.2 miles)
• Kroger Pharmacy (1.8 miles)
• Walgreens (2.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3.7 miles)
• Walgreens (3.8 miles)
• Walgreens (4 miles)

Physicians

• Baptist Health (2.2 miles)
• North Little Rock Family Practice Clinic (2.2 miles)
• UAMS Radiation Oncology Center (2.5 miles)
• Uams-Gastroenterology (2.5 miles)
• Schibuk Larry MD - UMass Memorial-Marlborough Hospital (2.5 miles)
• Uams Transplant Surgery (2.5 miles)
• Baptist Health Family Clinic-Hillcrest (2.7 miles)

Places of Worship

• Park Hill Baptist Church (2.8 miles)

Transportation

• Tsa Checkpoint Little Rock National Airport Little Rock (3.4 miles)
• Baggage Claim (3.5 miles)
• Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport (LIT) (3.5 miles)

Theaters

• Mccain Mall (4.2 miles)