11648 East Shea Boulevard # 101, Scottsdale, AZ 85259
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
There is a strong sense of gratitude mingled with a deep sense of disappointment in the account provided. On one hand, the writer expresses appreciation for Avenue as a company that genuinely cares about its employees and residents. They describe a culture of quality design and feature-rich environments, along with praise for the sales team and executive directors who, in their view, create a positive impression of the organization. The tone of thanks is sincere and persistent, suggesting that the reviewer was initially impressed by the promises and the atmosphere surrounding the facility and its leadership.
Yet, beneath that initial warmth lies a harsh critique directed at one individual who played a central role in the reviewer's experience. The narrative pivots to a scathing portrayal of Kristie Chadwick, who is described as one of the worst people the reviewer has encountered. The reviewer's mother was under Chadwick's care for six months, and the overall experience is described as a disaster. The accusations are pointed: Chadwick is labeled incompetent and manipulative, presenting herself well while allegedly lacking the background, education, experience, and expertise expected of someone in her position. The reviewer insists that Chadwick is "in over her head," and claims a pattern of poor judgment that allegedly affected the lives of more than just the reviewer's mother.
A central thread in the critique is the alleged misalignment between appearance and reality in Chadwick's leadership. The reviewer argues that Chadwick was more focused on saving money than on resident well-being, citing a striking lack of meaningful activities for residents. They describe a routine dominated by eating and extended bed rest, with little physical or mental stimulation. In their view, this neglect contributed to a decline in the reviewer's mother's physical condition - specifically, a loss of walking ability during the stay. The writer emphasizes that the facility's activity offerings were sparse, noting that Chadwick did arrange four outings per year, which pales in comparison to what the reviewer believes is the typical standard of care elsewhere, where outings can be more frequent. The "Casino Day" outing is highlighted as emblematic of the disconnect: it was scheduled even though it was ill-suited for someone dealing with memory loss, highlighting a perceived failure to consider the residents' cognitive and sensory needs.
Another dimension of the critique centers on accountability and transparency. The reviewer recounts a troubling incident involving a nighttime caregiver who assaulted the reviewer's mother. When the incident was reported to Chadwick, she allegedly denied any involvement by her employee and refused to permit access to surveillance videos. The narrative suggests a pattern of defensive blame-shifting, with Chadwick purportedly attributing harm to the residents themselves, a stance the reviewer found implausible, especially given the physical evidence (e.g., finger marks) and subsequent corroboration when a similar incident occurred with another resident under the same caregiver's supervision. The reviewer characterizes Chadwick as evasive and dismissive, ultimately failing to take decisive action to protect residents.
The mother's experience under Chadwick's care, according to the reviewer, culminates in a perception of verbal abuse and a perception that Chadwick prioritized self-protection and career advancement over genuine resident welfare. The writer urges others to investigate Chadwick's background, education, training, and experience before entrusting a loved one to her care, signaling a deep mistrust born from the alleged events. The long arc of the review leaves the impression that, for this reviewer, the care environment was problematic enough to prompt serious reconsideration of whether Chadwick's leadership is compatible with compassionate, high-quality elder care.
In addition to the broader critique of management, the reviewer recounts a personal experience as a caregiver staying overnight at the facility. The staff, in their account, were described as rude, bossy, and condescending, treating the reviewer as if they were the least competent person imaginable. This firsthand experience as a caregiver contributed to the overall negative impression of the facility's internal culture, reinforcing the sense that the environment was not supportive for those who are trying to provide care or to advocate effectively for residents.
Taken together, the two reviews present a dual narrative: a stated appreciation for the company's intent to foster a caring and well-structured environment, paired with a deeply critical, highly detailed account of alleged failures at the leadership level and in daily operations. The reviewer's memories are vivid and painstakingly described, highlighting perceived lapses in safety, activity programming, transparency, and staff demeanor. The result is a composite portrait of a facility that is praised for its mission and facilities but criticized for the conduct and judgment of a specific administrator, along with a troubling, firsthand experience of staff behavior that undermines confidence in the care environment.
If anything stands out across the passages, it is the emphasis on questions that families and prospective residents might want to ask: what is the background and training of the leadership? how robust are activities and cognitive/stimulation programs for residents, especially those with memory challenges? how accessible are surveillance and incident reports in the wake of suspected abuse or harm? and what is the day-to-day culture like for frontline staff, including how they interact with residents and with the families who rely on them? The reviewer's message is a clear reminder that even in settings that appear well-organized and reputable, there can be serious concerns about individual leadership choices and staff conduct that have real, lasting impacts on residents and their families.
Avenir Memory Care at Scottsdale is an assisted living community located in Scottsdale, AZ, dedicated to providing exceptional memory care services. Our community is fully furnished and offers a beautiful garden and outdoor space for residents to enjoy. We take care of all housekeeping services, allowing our residents to focus on their well-being.
For a seamless transition, we provide move-in coordination services to ensure that our residents feel comfortable and welcome from the moment they arrive. Our compassionate staff is trained to provide assistance with activities of daily living, including bathing, dressing, and transfers. We also offer specialized care for those with mild cognitive impairment.
At Avenir Memory Care at Scottsdale, we understand the importance of proper nutrition in maintaining overall health. That's why we carefully prepare and serve meals that cater to specific dietary restrictions, including diabetes diets and other special dietary needs.
Our community boasts a range of amenities designed to enhance the well-being of our residents. We offer medication management services to ensure that medications are taken on time and as prescribed. Additionally, our mental wellness program focuses on promoting cognitive function and emotional well-being.
Residents can participate in our specialized memory care programming, which includes engaging activities tailored to their individual needs and preferences. From scheduled daily activities to outings in the surrounding area, there is always something exciting happening for our residents.
Located near several cafes, pharmacies, physicians' offices, restaurants, places of worship, and hospitals, Avenir Memory Care at Scottsdale offers convenience for both residents and their families.
Avenir Memory Care at Scottsdale is located at 11648 East Shea Boulevard # 101, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 in Maricopa County, Arizona
The array of features at Avenir Memory Care at Scottsdale is designed to comprehensively support residents with dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Assistance with dressing and bathing helps preserve personal dignity and fosters independence, while medication management ensures that residents adhere to their prescribed treatments, minimizing health complications. Meal preparation and service cater to nutritional needs, which can significantly impact cognitive function. Activities of daily living assistance aids in maintaining routine and structure, essential for cognitive stability. Providing assistance with transfers supports physical mobility, promoting safety and preventing falls. The 24-hour supervision offers peace of mind for both residents and families, ensuring immediate help is available when needed. Furthermore, the mental wellness program addresses cognitive engagement through tailored activities that stimulate memory and mental health. For those experiencing mild cognitive impairment, specialized memory care programming offers targeted interventions that enhance quality of life and aim to slow the progression of symptoms.
Engaging Memory Care Activities That Enhance Quality of Life
Memory care activities are essential for improving the quality of life of seniors with cognitive impairments, as they stimulate cognitive function, promote well-being, and encourage social interaction through tailored strategies. These activities combine structured exercises with spontaneous tasks, sensory engagement, physical workouts, creative pursuits, and intergenerational interactions to enhance emotional connection and a sense of purpose.
Transitioning from assisted living to memory care is driven by an individual's cognitive decline and specific needs, requiring careful evaluation of indicators like increased confusion and wandering. The process involves consulting medical professionals, researching suitable communities, considering financial and legal aspects, and ensuring effective communication for personalized care plans.
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
The article differentiates between assisted living and memory care, explaining that assisted living supports seniors with daily activities while promoting independence, whereas memory care provides specialized services for individuals with dementia, focusing on secure environments and cognitive support. It also addresses staff training, safety considerations, costs, family involvement, and transition strategies for families navigating these care options.