4031 East Fawn Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85040
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Audrey's Adult Care Home I Costs & Pricing
Audrey's Adult Care Home I offers competitive pricing for its residents, positioning itself as an affordable option within Maricopa County and the state of Arizona. For semi-private accommodations, the monthly cost is $2,000, significantly lower than the county average of $2,801 and the state average of $2,820. Similarly, those seeking private rooms will find Audrey's rates of $2,500 to be quite appealing compared to Maricopa County's average of $3,318 and Arizona's average of $3,345. This pricing structure not only highlights Audrey's commitment to providing quality care at reasonable prices but also makes it an attractive choice for families navigating long-term care options in a challenging economic environment.
| Floor plans | Audrey's Adult Care Home I | Maricopa County | Arizona |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,000 | $2,801 | $2,820 |
| Private | $2,500 | $3,318 | $3,345 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Angel's Adult Group Home
$2,000 to $3,000 / month4.9 miles away -
About the same
Divine Mercy Assisted Living Home
$2,005 to $3,110 / month13.9 miles away -
from +$255 / mo
Windsor Luxury Assisted Living, LLC
$2,255 to $5,950 / month10.5 miles away -
from +$225 / mo
Harts Home - Exceptional Elder Care
$2,225 to $5,500 / month15.1 miles away -
from -$200 / mo
Divine Grace Assisted Living Home
$1,800 to $2,500 / month22.6 miles away
Overall Review of Audrey's Adult Care Home I
Pros
Audrey's Care Home is very nice.- Nick and Mariana are consummate professionals who run a caring, clean, nurturing facility.
- The home was a beautiful place.
- The home can accommodate small dogs.
- Private and shared rooms are available.
- Transportation is available to and from.
- Physicians come in monthly.
- Most services are available on-site.
- There are caregivers available 24/7.
- The facility accepts Cigna insurance.
Cons
The facility is not an adult daycare, and claims of it being a Behavioral Health Place are false.- The claims about Native Americans coming to acclimate with the Valley from the Reservation are untrue.
- Their trash is out of control, and they play loud music outside all day, violating city law.
- A staff member yelled at the guest.
- The staff member yelled at the reviewer.
- The reviewer was treated rudely.
- The resident begged to be taken out of there.
- One resident lay in a bed that was soiled.
- The reviewer would not recommend the place to anyone.
- Audrey's Care Home had too many residents.
- There was only one worker there, and he wasn't very clean.
- The facility was not nice inside or out.
- The home did not feel like the right place.
- The staff was overburdened, as one person was responsible for all six or seven residents.
Review
Audrey's Adult Care Home I is best suited for seniors who want a compact, home-like setting and for families prepared to stay actively involved in monitoring care. The small-bore, house-style environment can offer a sense of neighborhood and familiarity that appeals to residents who do not require intensive medical management around the clock. It may also attract families who value a pet-friendly option, with the possibility of allowing a small dog. However, this community is not ideal for those who expect a highly professional, regimented operation with strong overnight staffing or for families seeking pristine, consistently flawless maintenance and communication.
Careful consideration should be given to those who may want alternatives. Families prioritizing strict staffing ratios, formalized protocols, and highly polished facilities should look elsewhere. Seniors with significant cognitive or behavioral needs, frequent medical interventions, or a requirement for robust oversight may be better served by larger, more supervised settings. If consistency, predictability, and a clearly defined, professional program are non-negotiables, this home could prove frustrating.
On the positive side, the strongest attributes cited are the home atmosphere and the potential for closer-knit attention from a small team. Several reviewers described the setting as a “beautiful home” that could feel welcoming, and a few accounts mention professional, caring staff as a major plus when things align. For families who can be hands-on, visiting regularly, reviewing records, and coordinating medical appointments, the ambiance can translate into meaningful daily connections for residents. The presence of on-site or mobile services, such as routine medical visits or allied healthcare, and transportation options add practical value for those prioritizing convenience.
Yet the main drawbacks are substantive and hard to overlook. Reports of one staff member bearing responsibility for multiple residents, combined with concerns about cleanliness and upkeep, raise safety and dignity concerns. Instances of residents in soiled conditions and loud, disruptive behavior from staff undermine trust and comfort for both residents and families. Complaints about staff communication, ranging from broken-English interactions to perceived yelling, signal a deficit in respectful, clear exchanges that families rely on for peace of mind. The impression of overcrowding, with comments about too many residents and less-than-ideal interior or exterior conditions, further erodes confidence that the environment is well-managed or consistently nurturing.
The critical question becomes whether the pros can offset these cons in a meaningful way. For families able to invest time and energy into daily oversight, the home-like feel, pet-friendly policy, and potential for integrated services can partially compensate for staffing gaps and maintenance hiccups. However, when basic cleanliness, respectful communication, and reliable supervision are in question, the offset weakens quickly. In other words, the positives work only if there is a strong, ongoing commitment from family and staff to address concerns promptly and transparently, and if residents can tolerate a variable day-to-day experience.
Final guidance: this community can work for a select group, those who prize a warm, intimate setting and can supplement with regular family involvement, with realistic expectations about the limitations in staffing and maintenance. For families seeking predictable routines, rigorous professional standards, and airtight safety and cleanliness, stronger alternatives should be pursued. The decision hinges on willingness to engage actively with the home, to verify service promises, and to monitor day-to-day conditions closely. If these conditions align, Audrey's may offer a livable, affordable option; if not, the drawbacks outweigh the benefits and alternatives deserve priority.
10 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Respite Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities on-site
Bath tubs
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Phoenix Sky Harbor International (4 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview