Absolutely Able Home Care in Maricopa, AZ

Pros

• They are the best live-in care home for all.
• They take care of all people with love and care.
• They go above and beyond.
• They are absolutely amazing.
• They take the stress off your shoulders.
• They treat you like family.
• They are always there for you anytime of day or night.
• They love their clients and are like a tight-knit family.

Cons

• The establishment is very unprofessional and does not pay its workers.
• They are scammers who issue checks that are returned by the bank.
• The workers have not been paid since July.
• The owner, Mrs. Cheril Shoemaker, is described as dishonest and cold-hearted toward workers.
• Checks are bouncing and workers are being fined.
• People are advised not to use this place until workers are paid and treated fairly.

Review

Absolutely Able Home Care in Maricopa is best suited for families seeking a highly personalized, home-like live-in care arrangement where caregivers feel part of an extended family. The setting emphasizes intimate attention, with an owner who is hands-on and appears deeply involved in daily operations. For seniors who value everyday warmth, flexibility, and the feeling of belonging, this option can deliver a rare level of emotional support and continuity that larger agencies often struggle to match. In this model, caregivers may live on-site or be closely integrated into a single household, which can translate to rapid response and consistent routines. Those seeking a rigid corporate structure or extensive medical management should adjust expectations.

However, there are clear reasons to consider alternatives. The most significant red flag in the public record is payroll-related controversy: an accusation of failing to pay workers, with bounced checks and unpaid bills. Such reports raise questions about financial stability, payroll reliability, and the risk that caregivers could be pulled away or left unpaid, directly impacting continuity of care. For families with strict budgeting or who depend on predictable scheduling, this kind of risk is unacceptable. In short, if professional reliability and transparent, verifiable operations are non-negotiable, safer options deserve consideration.

On the upside, families describe a care culture that feels loving and attentive. Reviews highlight stress reduction for families, a sense that staff treat clients like family, and a founder who is visibly present and serious about the job. The care environment is characterized by warmth, flexibility, and a willingness to go above and beyond, with round-the-clock availability and relatively affordable pricing in today’s economic climate. Price sensitivity is a real factor here; for families paying out-of-pocket or working within tight budgets, the affordability can be a compelling reason to weigh this option. Those who respond well to a close-knit arrangement may find this setting uniquely reassuring.

Nevertheless, the split in experiences cannot be ignored. When payroll and legitimacy concerns surface, trust in operations erodes quickly, especially in a field as sensitive as in-home care. The risk is not merely financial; it is the threat to staff stability, continuity of care, and the potential for abrupt changes in caregivers. The combination of strong personal warmth and uncertain administrative practices can leave families exposed to last-minute caregiver turnover, scheduling gaps, or unresolved billing disputes. In practical terms, the robust personal touch may be undermined if the business basics, payments, contracts, and compliance, are unstable.

Prospective buyers should pursue disciplined due diligence before committing. Request current payroll records and written assurances about ongoing pay and benefits, speak with multiple caregivers if possible, and ask for a detailed contract outlining rates, duties, and backup plans. Verify state licensing status and check for any past complaints or regulatory actions. Insist on a clear, written policy for emergencies and caregiver substitutions, plus a documented process for addressing disputes. If the decision leans toward this provider, arrange a monitored trial period with defined milestones and a plan for transitioning to alternative care if red flags reemerge. For those prioritizing predictability, alternatives include larger, non-franchise agencies or licensed assisted living communities with established risk controls.

Bottom line: Absolutely Able Home Care can be a compelling fit for families who prize genuine connection, flexibility, and personal attention, provided payroll and operational integrity are resolutely verified and monitored. When those operational assurances are shaky, however, the advantages of a warm, family-style model do not automatically outweigh the potential for disruption and risk. For families with higher needs for professional oversight, medical management, or transparent governance, exploring other home-care providers or transitioning to an assisted living setting may yield greater peace of mind and steadier care. The right choice hinges on balancing the irresistible human touch with solid, verifiable administrative trust.