College Park Rehabilitation And Care Center

Pros

• The facility is beautiful and well-maintained, creating a pleasant environment for residents.
• The food served at College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center received positive feedback, with residents enjoying their meals.
• Therapies offered are beneficial, helping residents make significant progress in their recovery.
• Staff members were described as kind and responsive to the needs of the residents on several occasions.
• Family members felt well-informed about their loved ones' progress during their stay at the facility.
• Activities provided for memory care residents were engaging and promoted interaction and expression.
• One reviewer praised an administrator for being hardworking, honest, and kind, demonstrating effective leadership qualities.

Cons

• The sister was not given anything to drink for over three hours after surgery and had to fetch it herself.
• The facility failed to provide adequate hygiene care, with the sister only receiving one shower in a week and being left in soiled clothes multiple times.
• Staff were slow to respond to call buttons, causing family members to intervene by calling the front desk for help.
• There was a noticeable lack of attention from staff, leading to the belief that they were either under-staffed or negligent in their duties.
• The management has shown a lack of sensitivity and compassion towards residents, particularly highlighted during difficult times.
• While the facility appeared nice, the actual care provided did not meet expectations, leading residents' families to feel neglected.
• One reviewer mentioned encountering rude and unhelpful nursing staff who were dismissive of concerns raised by family members.
• There were complaints about staff being more engaged with each other than with the residents needing assistance during meals.

Review

The experiences shared by families regarding the care provided at College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center present a complex picture, characterized by contrasts in both positive and negative feedback. While the facility is often described as aesthetically pleasing, an overarching concern emerges regarding the quality of care and attentiveness received by residents. These sentiments are echoed across multiple reviews, painting a troubling image of caregiving standards, especially during vulnerable periods of rehabilitation and recovery.

Many families reported inadequate attention to the basic needs of their loved ones. A notable case involved a sister admitted post-surgery for a broken ankle who experienced significant delays in receiving water and bathing assistance. Residents have reportedly spent extended periods without changes to soiled clothes or bedding, which raises serious concerns about hygiene practices within the facility. One reviewer described their mother being left in a soiled diaper without timely intervention—a situation that not only underscores neglect but deeply impacts the dignity of residents. The staffing situation appears to contribute to these challenges, as some family members had to intervene directly for care their loved ones required, indicating an alarming level of understaffing or lack of responsiveness from nursing staff.

In contrast to these issues were accounts highlighting positive experiences from families who felt their loved ones received excellent care. One reviewer praised the attentiveness and kindness shown by staff, noting that their mother made substantial progress during her rehabilitation stay. They appreciated regular communication from management about her recovery and expressed satisfaction with meal quality—an aspect that many residents also found agreeable during their stays. This disparity points toward potential inconsistencies in care delivery based on individual staff performance or specific departments while emphasizing how critical direct oversight may be for maintaining high standards.

The divide in experiences may reflect broader operational challenges facing College Park since changes in ownership or management five years ago. Some reviewers lamented a decline in compassionate caregiving amidst what they perceived as a shift toward prioritizing quantity over quality in operations—suggesting that administrative decisions might ultimately affect day-to-day interactions between staff and residents. Negative interactions with management have fortified this perspective for some families; one account described an administrator's inability to address concerns effectively while exhibiting hostility towards complaints about resident care.

Moreover, despite glowing reports from some families about favorable treatment within memory care programs, persistent criticisms emerged regarding staff attitudes and engagement levels with residents needing assistance eating or receiving therapy services. Reviewers pointed out moments where caregivers seemed distracted—more focused on personal conversations than attending to those under their supervision—which can detract significantly from overall care quality at critical times when residents need encouragement and nourishment.

Amidst this conflicting landscape lies appreciation for particular individuals within the facility who showcased genuine concern and compassion toward residents—the "one nice nurse" identified by one frustrated family member highlights how individual practitioners can stand out positively against systemic flaws observed elsewhere. Such mixed testimony suggests that while College Park offers potential benefits—including appealing surroundings and certain dedicated personnel—the realities faced by numerous families call into question its ability to provide consistent high-quality support across all aspects of resident care.

Ultimately, the reviews reveal deep disparities between expectations set forth by marketing materials versus lived realities encountered by families during times of crisis communication embedded within healthcare settings like senior living facilities. While there are commendable aspects related to pleasant environments and specific instances of outstanding caregiving, urgent improvements are necessary regarding responsiveness and overall commitment toward holistic patient welfare at College Park Rehabilitation Center if it aims to uphold its reputation amidst increasingly discerning scrutiny from patrons seeking dependable senior care options.

Hospitals

• Bratton (0.1 miles)
• Weatherford Imaging Center (0.5 miles)
• Weatherford Regional Medical Center Cardiac & Pulmonary Rehabilitation Services (0.6 miles)
• Campbell Memorial Hospital (0.7 miles)
• Campbell Health System (0.7 miles)

Physicians

• Family Eye Care Center (0.3 miles)
• Texas Medical Diagnostic (0.4 miles)
• Timothy L Huggins (0.5 miles)
• Parker County Urgent Care Center (0.6 miles)
• Susan Walker, MD Pediatrics (0.6 miles)
• Weatherford Pediatrics (0.7 miles)
• Weatherford Primary Care (0.7 miles)

Restaurants

• McAlister's Deli (0.4 miles)
• Logan's Roadhouse (0.4 miles)
• Olive Garden (0.5 miles)
• Rosa's Cafe (0.5 miles)
• IHOP (0.5 miles)
• McDonald's (0.5 miles)
• Panda Express (0.5 miles)

Theaters

• Film Alley (0.4 miles)

Cafes

• Panera Bread (0.5 miles)
• HTeaO (0.9 miles)
• R & K on Santa Fe (0.9 miles)
• The Full Cup Bookstore and Coffee Shop (1 miles)
• Whistle Hill Cafe (1.5 miles)
• Northside Remedy (1.7 miles)

Pharmacies

• Tackett Pharmacy & Nutrition Center (0.5 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (0.6 miles)
• The Pharmacy At Walmart (0.7 miles)
• NexGen Pharmaceuticals (0.7 miles)
• Walgreens (0.7 miles)
• Town Creek Pharmacy (0.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.3 miles)

Places of Worship

• North District Office (0.6 miles)
• Life Sanctuary (0.8 miles)
• First United Methodist-Weatherford (1.4 miles)
• All Saints Episcopal Church (1.6 miles)

Transportation

• Enterprise Rent-A-Car (1.4 miles)
• Budget Truck Rental (1.9 miles)

Parks

• Cherry Park (1.5 miles)
• Weatherford Parks & Recreation (1.7 miles)