Green D Inc in San Antonio, TX

Pros

• Green Grass has maintained the residential lawn for over 9 years and has done a great job.
• The crew at Green Grass stays on top of the lawn and keeps it looking showroom-ready.
• John Suares and his staff make the neighborhood's yard the talk of the town.
• The crew did great work and left no mess to clean up after they were done.
• Green Grass offers competitive bids with reliable crews.

Cons

• The reviewer notes a truck on I-410 dumping dirt with no tarp, calling it wasteful and dangerous for other drivers.
• A truck on Interstate 35 North was described as being on its phone and nearly causing an accident, labeling the company as horrible.
• The weed eater operator and crew were described as terrible, worthless, and ignorant, flinging grass and leaves near someone who was eating.
• The company is accused of being rip-off artists, with a sprinkler system full of problems, frequent lost supervisors, late arrivals, and installers who do not do quality work.
• The reviewer states that every year they have to spend large sums repairing or replacing what the company did years ago.

Review

Green D Inc is best suited for San Antonio homeowners and property managers who handle sizable residential lots or small commercial sites and want a landscape partner capable of delivering on large-scale projects. The leadership around John and crews that reliably show up to tackle bigger jobs with a professional finish create real value for clients seeking a tidy, show-ready exterior and design-forward landscaping. When the objective is polished workmanship that can scale with a growing property portfolio, Green D Inc stands out as a dependable fit.

That said, there are clear reasons some buyers should consider alternatives. A portion of the reviews paints a picture of reliability and safety concerns: trucks without tarps letting dirt fly, drivers on phones creating near-misses, and weed-eating that intrudes on a client’s personal space. Add to that recurring complaints about missed appointments, supervisor turnover, and irrigation systems that require ongoing fixes rather than a one-time setup. For buyers who cannot tolerate scheduling gaps, inconsistent supervision, or persistent irrigation headaches, shopping around is prudent.

The strongest positivesCenter on leadership and execution. John’s direction appears to translate into crews that arrive on time, handle large-scale commercial and residential work, and deliver clean, finished results with less mess to clean up afterward. When the project involves front-yard redesigns or substantive planting schemes, the firm’s design ideas can meaningfully elevate curb appeal. For clients seeking competitive bids and reliable execution on substantial properties, these capabilities provide real leverage and a measurable return on effort.

Yet those advantages do not erase the risk factors. The reviews reveal that good design and timely crews can be offset by safety lapses, inconsistent supervision, and irrigation fragility. The risk is amplified for projects where ongoing maintenance and prompt fixes matter, since irrigation reliability and service responsiveness appear to vary. In practice, this means results may be excellent under strong day-to-day management, but can deteriorate without a disciplined governance structure and proactive problem-solving.

To convert potential into consistent outcomes, approach Green D Inc with a structured plan. Insist on a single on-site supervisor who shepherds the project end-to-end, from design through irrigation setup and beyond. Require a written scope with milestones and a warranty covering irrigation components and workmanship. Push for thorough references on similar property types and a defined process for addressing mistakes or rework. Given the mixed track record, a site-specific pilot or staged rollout helps separate standout design and execution from the variability that has appeared in some jobs.

Cost clarity and contract discipline matter as well. Obtain detailed, line-item bids and a clear change-order policy upfront. The reviews imply pricing can be competitive, but there are allegations of ongoing repair costs after installation, so budgeting for long-term maintenance is essential. Ensure proper licensing and insurance are in place, and lock in contractual remedies for missed dates or substandard workmanship. A robust irrigation maintenance plan with scheduled checks and guaranteed response times reduces the risk of recurring failures and helps protect the investment over time.

In the end, Green D Inc offers a compelling package for owners who want strong leadership, reliable crews, and creative landscaping for larger San Antonio properties, provided there is rigorous oversight. For those who prize flawless consistency, immediate issue resolution, and zero tolerance for safety or scheduling slips, alternatives may deliver more predictable results. When used with a concrete governance plan, clear scope, a dedicated supervisor, fixed milestones, warranties, and a disciplined contract, the potential to achieve standout outdoor results rises considerably. This partner is not a universal fit, but for the right project and the right client, the return on investment can be substantial.