Woodbridge Care Center

Pros

• The staff treats patients like family and provides excellent care, creating a warm and welcoming environment.
• The facility is very clean, with well-maintained areas that contribute to a comfortable experience for residents.
• Many visitors appreciate the high-quality therapy services offered, which help patients recuperate effectively.
• The rehab team is described as awesome and attentive, ensuring that residents receive the necessary support during their recovery.
• The facility accommodates special dietary needs, providing nutritious meals tailored to individual preferences.
• Residents have reported positive experiences with weight programs and therapies that have significantly improved their health.
• Overall satisfaction from families whose loved ones have received good care during their stay at the facility indicates a reliable level of service provided by the staff.

Cons

• The facility is consistently described as dirty, smelly, and poorly maintained.
• Many reviewers report a lack of communication from staff, with long wait times on calls.
• Residents are frequently sent to the hospital without clear explanations for their conditions.
• There are complaints about inadequate staffing and undertrained employees who do not provide proper care.
• Several reviewers mention lost belongings and poor laundry management, including missing clothes and insufficient supplies like blankets and towels.
• The food served is often described as low quality and unappetizing.
• Residents reportedly receive unequal treatment, leading to feelings of neglect among some individuals.
• Caregivers are accused of being unresponsive to residents' needs, resulting in discomfort and unsanitary conditions.
• There are instances of negligence reported by family members concerning the care given to their loved ones.
• Overall dissatisfaction with the facility leads several reviewers to recommend against sending loved ones there.

Review

The reviews for Woodbridge Rehabilitation and Health Center present a stark contrast between experiences, illustrating a facility that evokes both positive sentiments and serious concerns from those who have entrusted their loved ones to its care. On one hand, some families express gratitude for the warmth, attentiveness, and supportive environment provided by the staff. For instance, several reviewers highlight their appreciation for the compassionate approach of caregivers and mention how they felt treated like family during visits. These glowing remarks often pertain to specific instances where residents received effective rehabilitation services, were introduced to beneficial weight management programs, or enjoyed well-prepared meals tailored to dietary restrictions. One reviewer specifically complimented the facility for accommodating a vegan diet and praised the quality of therapy received.

Conversely, numerous accounts detail alarming issues within the facility that raise significant red flags about its overall management. Among these complaints are frequent reports of unsanitary conditions, such as foul odors permeating common areas and individual rooms plagued with maintenance problems like broken doors and insufficient heating for water supply. Residents reportedly experienced inadequate support when personal needs arose; one reviewer recounted watching staff neglect to change a resident in distress while others expressed frustration over disappearing personal items like clothing or missing supplies such as blankets. The inconsistency in treatment seems particularly troubling, with claims suggesting that certain residents receive preferential treatment while others are left unattended.

Moreover, communication challenges have been highlighted as an ongoing struggle between family members seeking information about their loved ones’ well-being and the facility’s willingness—or ability—to provide timely updates. Many families recounted long waits on hold when trying to reach staff members or receiving vague responses when inquiries were made about their relatives' health status. In one tragic case, a family member shared how their loved one was repeatedly sent to the hospital under concerning circumstances without sufficient explanation from staff representatives during phone communications.

Several accounts also note broader systemic issues within Woodbridge Rehabilitation that exacerbate individual discontent: understaffing is frequently mentioned alongside complaints regarding poor training among employees leading to inadequate care delivery. Reviewers assert that even though there may be passionate individuals among them who strive for excellence in care coordination, general oversight appears lacking across shifts—yielding an environment where residents do not receive adequate attention or assistance they need throughout daily activities.

The aesthetic conditions surrounding the facility also came under scrutiny from multiple reviewers who remarked on poorly maintained exteriors juxtaposed against internal cleanliness concerns. The physical landscaping around Woodbridge was characterized by unkempt bushes and trees—a reflection perhaps of deeper administrative neglect that resonates with reviews mentioning dilapidated infrastructure within the building itself. Patrons noted that although initial tours might exhibit a welcoming façade accompanied by informative discussions about Medicaid assistance options offered during admission processes, this initial impression often did not translate into ongoing satisfactory experiences once residents settled in.

In conclusion, Woodbridge Rehabilitation and Health Center stands at crossroads formed by contrasting narratives from families who either praise its warmth and successful therapeutic interventions or decry persistent lapses in cleanliness, communication hurdles exacerbated by apparent neglectful practices among staff members compounded by an overarching atmosphere devoid of standard quality control measures necessary for providing appropriate care to vulnerable individuals residing within its walls. While some patients undoubtedly leave satisfied with recovery efforts intact—and indeed recommend it favorably—others walk away feeling deeply disappointed after enduring what they view as unacceptable standards set forth by a facility operating far below expectations required for competent healthcare environments tasked with safeguarding dignity among its clientele during crucial times of rehabilitation.

Restaurants

• Burger King (0.3 miles)
• Village Inn (1.3 miles)
• McDonald's (2 miles)
• Bahama Breeze (2.4 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (2.7 miles)
• Ford's Garage (2.9 miles)
• El Coqui Bakery (4.2 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.3 miles)
• Walgreens (0.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.1 miles)
• Walgreens (1.7 miles)
• Walgreens (3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3.1 miles)
• Walgreens (4.1 miles)

Hospitals

• Tampa Community Hospital (0.4 miles)
• Florida Hospital Carrollwood (4.7 miles)

Physicians

• Podiatry (0.6 miles)
• Women's Care Florida (4.1 miles)
• Shady Grove Fertility (4.5 miles)
• Moffitt Cancer Center at International Plaza (4.8 miles)
• Florida Orthopaedic Institute (4.8 miles)
• Tampa Bay Cardi Ovascular (5.6 miles)
• Tower Radiology Centers - Habana (5.7 miles)

Parks

• Northwest County Dog Park (1.9 miles)
• Beach Park (5.6 miles)
• Carrollwood Village Park (6 miles)
• Cooper Bayou Park (6.9 miles)
• Rivercrest Park (7 miles)

Transportation

• Airside F (3.1 miles)
• American Airlines Ticket Counter (3.1 miles)
• Main Terminal Tpa Tampa (3.1 miles)
• Tampa International Airport (TPA) (3.1 miles)
• Starbuck's Airside E (3.2 miles)
• TSA Screening (3.4 miles)
• Airside A (3.4 miles)

Theaters

• AMC Veterans 24 (3.2 miles)
• Regal Cinemas Citrus Park 2 (4.8 miles)

Places of Worship

• Vishnu Mandir (4 miles)
• St Paul Catholic Church (6.3 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (4.6 miles)
• Panera Bread (5.1 miles)
• Caffeine Roasters (7 miles)
• Buddy Brew Coffee (7.2 miles)
• Starbucks (7.5 miles)
• Starbucks (7.7 miles)
• Buddy Brew (7.8 miles)