Wright Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Pros

• The staff members at Wright Nursing are described as very attentive and genuinely caring, making residents feel like family.
• Family members appreciate the exceptional day-to-day care provided by the nurses and aides on the floor.
• The facility is noted for its cleanliness and pleasant atmosphere, contributing to a positive environment for residents.
• Staff members have gone above and beyond to accommodate the needs of residents with special care requirements.
• Lucy Sykes provided an informative and welcoming tour of the memory care unit, highlighting the facility's amenities and overall positive impression.

Cons

• The veteran workers on the west side are described as terrible, neglecting to answer call lights and leaving their posts for hours.
• Staff members have been accused of merely doubling briefs instead of properly changing residents, demonstrating a lack of proper care.
• A family reported that in just five days, their veteran father went from recovering well after hip surgery to dying in the hospital due to inadequate care.
• There is concern about high staff turnover among leadership positions, leading to communication problems within the facility.
• A review indicates that certain aides exhibit laziness and should either be relocated or terminated due to their poor performance.
• The negative experiences highlight a significant discrepancy between long-term staff effectiveness and newer leadership stability at the facility.

Review

The quality of care in long-term facilities is often a topic of significant concern for families with loved ones residing there, and Wright Nursing has become a focal point for mixed sentiments. Several reviews reflect deeply contrasting experiences, painting a complex picture of the staff's dedication and shortcomings. On one hand, some families have expressed profound dissatisfaction with the level of service provided, citing instances of neglect and lackluster attention from certain long-tenured aides and nurses. A particularly alarming account described how a veteran patient deteriorated from recovery to death within five days, suggesting severe inadequacies in the care provided during this crucial period.

Critics highlight specific issues such as failure to answer call lights or changes in patients, instead opting for double brokering, which speaks to an alarming negligence in personal hygiene and overall patient dignity. The frustrations are heightened by the observation that these inadequate staff members remain employed despite their poor performance. Concerns about these so-called "lazy aides" loomed large among some reviewers who insisted that management should take immediate action—whether through reassignment to different units or termination—to ensure residents receive the necessary attention they deserve.

Conversely, other family members paint a far more positive picture of Wright Nursing. Reviews indicate that many staff members genuinely care about the residents, treating them like family rather than mere patients. One reviewer who has had a family member at Wright for nearly three years emphasized how attentive and dedicated the aides are on the floor. This sentiment was further echoed by comments highlighting extraordinary efforts made by caregivers to cater to special needs arising from cognitive or physical challenges faced by residents.

However, despite these commendations regarding frontline staff interactions, concerns about turnover among leadership roles have emerged as potential red flags for families relying on consistent oversight for their loved ones’ well-being. Several accounts noted a sudden departure of key personnel such as administrators, social workers, and floor managers—roles critical to coordinating care effectively across departments—which has led to observable communication problems within the facility. While day-to-day caregiving seems secure in its quality thanks to stable bedside staff remaining devoted to their work, families hope that these leadership positions will be filled promptly with competent individuals who can uphold high standards of operation.

Wright Nursing's environment received praise for cleanliness and general organization—a vital aspect considering it houses dementia and Alzheimer’s patients who require structured routines. Visitors noted pleasant tours offered by friendly staff members like Lucy Sykes, who were willing to provide insights into various aspects of resident life at Wright including kitchen access and community spaces available for residents' enjoyment. Such impressions leave new prospects feeling reassured about safety measures taken within memory care settings.

Furthermore, amenities available at Wright would contribute positively to both residents' experience and familial peace-of-mind while visiting their loved ones regularly—features include beauty services once a week along with shared facilities designed thoughtfully around everyday needs in mind. Yet still lingering doubts regarding administrative continuity cast shadows over prospective assessments; once warmly welcomed visits may become tinged with anxiety surrounding inconsistencies faced post-leadership changes.

In summary, feedback on Wright Nursing elucidates two strikingly different narratives intertwined within its walls: one marred by neglect among specific caregivers leading tragic outcomes; another buoyed by passionate commitment from live-in caretakers aiming tirelessly to provide exceptional service under challenging circumstances exacerbated by administrative instability. Identifying this duality prompts essential questions not just toward alleviating immediate distress but also nurturing ongoing advancement across all levels tasked with safeguarding vulnerable populations entrusted within skilled nursing environments.

An authentic appraisal must ultimately consider both sides while urging transparency throughout revisions required towards sustaining momentum in effective eldercare practices going forth—building toward stronger foundations capable of supporting elderly communities comprehensively united under mutual respect spanning generations well beyond fleeting trends observed today.

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (1 miles)
• Zecchini, Michael E (2.7 miles)
• Kroger Pharmacy (2.8 miles)
• Discount Drug Mart (3.5 miles)
• Drug Mart (4.1 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (4.6 miles)
• Walgreens (5.6 miles)

Transportation

• Wright Patterson Air Force Base Airport Ffo (1.8 miles)
• U-Haul Moving & Storage (10.1 miles)

Parks

• Wedgewood Park (2 miles)
• John Bryan State Park (7.6 miles)
• Sol Arnovitz Park (9.8 miles)

Hospitals

• Wright-Patterson Medical Center (2.3 miles)
• Soin Medical Center (4.9 miles)
• Dayton Children's (9.5 miles)
• Kettering Health Greene Memorial (9.5 miles)
• Greene Memorial Hospital (10.1 miles)

Physicians

• Brown, Darci Kettering Physician Network Primary Care (2.5 miles)
• Wright State Physicians Dermatology (3.6 miles)
• Western Medicine (5.2 miles)
• Oak Creek Ob.-Gyn (5.3 miles)
• Pugar, Kenneth Dayton Center for Neurological Disorders (5.3 miles)
• Hahn, Holly Advanced Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery Beavercreek (5.4 miles)
• Kerchner Facial Aesthetic Center (5.5 miles)

Restaurants

• TJ Chumps (3 miles)
• Taco Bell (4.3 miles)
• McDonald's (4.4 miles)
• McDonald's (4.5 miles)
• Skyline Chili (4.5 miles)
• Melt Bar and Grilled (4.9 miles)
• Osaka Japanese Steakhouse (5.2 miles)

Cafes

• Panera Bread (4.7 miles)
• Starbucks (4.8 miles)
• Winans Fine Chocolates & Coffee Wine (4.8 miles)
• The Wandering Griffin (4.9 miles)
• Starbucks (4.9 miles)
• DiBella's Subs (5.2 miles)
• Panera Bread (7.4 miles)

Places of Worship

• Beavercreek Church of the Nazarene (6.3 miles)
• Saint Helen Catholic Church (7.7 miles)
• Holy Trinity A.M.E Church (9.7 miles)