10 Dial Road, Monroe, GA 30656
To contact a resident: (706) 202-4271
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Caring Hearts II Costs & Pricing
Caring Hearts II offers competitive pricing for its accommodations, providing valuable options for those seeking assisted living services. The monthly cost for a semi-private room is $2,000, which is notably lower than both the average rates in Walton County at $2,304 and across Georgia at $2,529. Additionally, their one-bedroom option is priced at $2,400, again offering a more affordable alternative compared to Walton County's average of $3,301 and the state-wide rate of $3,412. The private room price mirrors that of the one-bedroom at $2,400 as well and remains below the local and state averages of $2,643 and $2,864 respectively. Overall, Caring Hearts II provides an attractive balance between quality care and affordability in comparison to surrounding options.
| Floor plans | Caring Hearts II | Walton County | Georgia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,000 | $2,304 | $2,529 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,400 | $3,301 | $3,412 |
| Private | $2,400 | $2,643 | $2,864 |
Overall Review of Caring Hearts II
Pros
The house was in much better condition than the other one the reviewer visited.
It was conveniently located for the reviewer’s brother to visit.
The semi-private room was quite large.
The owner and her daughter were friendly.
The owner offered a seven-day trial period.
The owner offered to work with the reviewer on the monthly rate.
Cons
The bathroom is not close or easily accessible.
The mother would not be able to get into or out of the tub on her own.
Review
Caring Hearts II in Monroe, GA is best suited for families that want a small, home-like setting with easy family access and a tightly supervised, intimate atmosphere. This option works well for residents who are comfortable sharing a semi-private room and can tolerate basic bathing safety needs with assistance. The house’s condition and layout, plus the proximity to family members for frequent visits, make it a practical choice for those who value a low-key, personal environment over a larger, more impersonal facility. A key plus is the option to test fit with a seven-day trial, providing a low-risk way to assess whether the dynamic and daily routine align with care expectations before committing long term.
Those weighing Caring Hearts II should consider alternatives if enhanced accessibility, more formal supervision, or specialized care programming are non-negotiable. Residents who require fully accessible bathrooms in their living space, want a layout designed for easy mobility, or need memory-care focused activities and 24/7 oversight may find larger assisted living homes or dedicated memory-care communities better suited to their needs. If staff availability for hands-on transfers and safety protocols is a high priority, exploring options with more structured staffing and facility-wide accessibility features is prudent.
On the upside, the most tangible benefits align with a practical, family-friendly model. The house, reported as in notably better condition than other visited options, reduces maintenance concerns and creates a reassuring backdrop for daily life. Its location is clearly convenient for relatives to visit, removing a common friction point for families who want to stay closely involved. The semi-private room, described as large, offers more breathing room and comfort than cramped shared spaces. Coupled with friendly ownership, these factors can translate into a less stressful transition for both resident and family, especially when a seven-day trial is available at a modest daily rate.
The defining drawback centers on bathroom accessibility. The current setup with a bathtub-shower combination places the resident at risk for transfer challenges, and the reviewer noted that the mother would not be able to enter or exit the tub independently. This is the kind of safety hurdle that can erode confidence if not addressed. Without an easily accessible bathroom or a walk-in shower, the resident depends heavily on staff assistance, which raises questions about supervision levels, response times, and fall risk in daily routines. Families should press for a clear plan: is there a feasible retrofit, would portable accessibility aids be used, and can the layout be rearranged to improve safety?
The overall value hinges on how the strengths balance the hazards. The favorable condition of the home, the informal but reliable family-like atmosphere, and the trial option collectively offset several concerns by offering a transparent, testable care situation. The willingness of the owner to negotiate the monthly rate adds a meaningful financial lever, especially for households balancing quality with affordability. For families who can leverage the trial to observe staff responsiveness, cleanliness, and day-to-day operations, Caring Hearts II presents a plausible path to a comfortable, temporary or extended arrangement without surrendering family involvement.
In the end, a decisive choice hinges on realistic safety benchmarks and long-term care expectations. If a resident can live with a semi-private setting and can tolerate ongoing assistance with bathing dependencies, this community can deliver a warm, neighborly environment that keeps family involvement front and center. For those who require seamless accessibility, comprehensive safety enhancements, or more intensive supervision, it is prudent to look at alternatives that offer in-room accessible baths, more robust care plans, and a facility design built around mobility-impaired living. Before committing, arrange a thorough visit, map the bathroom flow and transfer points, confirm staffing patterns and response protocols, and insist on concrete details about possible modifications and the total monthly cost.





Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences