5404 Pearce Ave, Lakewood, CA 90712
To contact a resident: (562) 804-7304
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
MPS Retirement Homes Costs & Pricing
MPS Retirement Homes presents a competitive pricing structure compared to broader regional averages, particularly in Los Angeles County and throughout California. For a semi-private room, MPS charges $5,000 per month, which is notably higher than the county's average of $3,349 and the state's average of $3,333. The private room option at MPS also reflects this trend, with a monthly fee of $6,000, surpassing both the county average of $4,197 and the statewide average of $3,939. Similarly, for a one-bedroom unit, MPS maintains its premium positioning at $6,000 compared to county and state averages of $4,603 and $4,340 respectively. While MPS Retirement Homes may have higher costs than local alternatives, these figures might reflect enhanced services or amenities that cater to residents seeking exceptional care and comfort in their retirement living experience.
| Floor plans | MPS Retirement Homes | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $5,000 | $3,349 | $3,333 |
| Private | $6,000 | $4,197 | $3,939 |
| 1 Bedroom | $6,000 | $4,603 | $4,340 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of MPS Retirement Homes
Pros
The staff were on time for their appointment.
The staff answered questions in detail.
The open floor plan and the amenities for residents were appealing.
The community looked nice overall.
Cons
The front desk staff were rude and inconsiderate, delivering terrible customer service.
The location ultimately was not the right fit for them.
There were no openings at the time of their search.
It was one of the pricier options they considered.
Review
MPS Retirement Homes in Lakewood is best suited for families seeking a polished, amenity-rich setting with a modern, open floor plan and a tour process that earns trust through clear, detailed answers. The property presents well on appearance and layout, with a variety of resident-focused amenities that signal a ready-made lifestyle. Those who can move on a flexible timeline and can absorb a premium price will likely appreciate the environment, especially if they place a premium on presentation, safety-conscious design, and a schedule that respects questions asked during tours. While the location isnāt perfect for every family, the core appeal rests in the environment and the visible quality of facilities.
Careful buyers should also acknowledge who may want to consider alternatives. Prospective residents who must secure immediate occupancy will find the lack of current openings a meaningful obstacle. Budget-sensitive families will view the price as a decisive factor, since this option sits toward the higher end of the market. Finally, families that place a high value on consistently warm, responsive front-desk service should scrutinize interactions at the entry point; a single negative experience can tilt the overall impression, even when other elements are strong.
On the upside, the strongest positives are tangible and practical. A well-considered open floor plan enhances mobility and social flow, easing transitions for residents and visitors alike. The amenities are more than cosmetic; they offer daily activity options that support independent living while preserving opportunities for engagement. When touring, staff demonstrated punctuality and a willingness to answer questions in depth, which helps families gauge fit beyond glossy marketing. These elements collectively mitigate some risk by offering a concrete sense of what daily life could feel like in this community.
Yet the main drawbacks are substantive and must be weighed against the positives. The front-desk experience, described as rude and inconsiderate by one reviewer, raises legitimate concerns about frontline interactions and ongoing staff culture. Even if the tour staff are professional, a troubling first impression can extend to resident-facing encounters and ongoing service quality. Pricing sits at a premium tier, with multiple families noting it as a decisive consideration. Additionally, the reality of no immediate openings means the timeline of care can be uncertain, complicating planning for families with urgent needs. Location concerns, while subjective, also factor into overall suitability.
From a practical decision-making standpoint, the pros and cons create a clear calculus. The appealing layout and robust amenities can justify the higher price for families prioritizing a refined environment and a confident showroom experience, provided there is no urgency to move in immediately. The decisive counterweight comes from availability and service consistency: if openings are scarce and front-desk interactions have shown volatility, the overall value proposition weakens for cost- and time-sensitive prospects. In such cases, it makes strategic sense to compare alternative communities that offer more immediate access or more predictable pricing.
The recommended course is straightforward. For families who can wait for a suitable opening and can tolerate premium pricing for a polished setting, MPS Retirement Homes presents a credible, well-built option worth a careful second look. For those requiring quick occupancy, budget discipline, or a consistently warm, service-driven front desk, alternatives should be pursued without hesitation. Prospective residents should demand current availability, a transparent pricing package, and at least one additional, unprompted tour to observe staff dynamics at different times of day. In short, the decision hinges on timing, price tolerance, and the reliability of the initial customer experience.











8 Key Indicators That Suggest It May Be Time to Transition from Assisted Living to Skilled Nursing Care
Nourishing the Mind: Essential Dietary Approaches for Dementia
Understanding Dementia Behaviors: Practical Insights and Strategies for Caregivers