Orange Trailer Court

Pros

• The park is described as a wonderful place to live with great neighbors and friends.
• Ruby, the park manager, is described as a very wonderful person.
• The maintenance staff, including Pat, is described as awesome and helpful.
• The park is very secure and well kept, with a key-code gate.
• It is described as an oasis in the desert.
• It is a nice, friendly, gated community.
• The maintenance team is extremely helpful and courteous, a great asset to have.
• The place is loved and regarded as a great place to live.

Cons

• The park is owned by a slum lord and is described as a horrible place.
• New owners apparently do not care about the park.
• Rent is too high and residents are described as rude.
• The park is filthy with sewer smells and cockroach infestations.
• Management allegedly lied about criminal history and forced tenants to move out.
• It is described as a crack house with terrified crack heads.
• Felons are reportedly unable to rent unless they pay an additional $50.

Review

The collection of impressions paints a picture of a trailer park that elicits fiercely positive feelings from some residents and sharp dissatisfaction from others. On one end of the spectrum, neighbors speak warmly of the community as a place with good people, friendly vibes, and a sense of security. The park is repeatedly described as clean, well kept, and surprisingly tranquil given its size. A recurring thread is the presence of dependable local leadership who seem to anchor the positive experiences: Ruby, the park manager, is frequently praised as a wonderful and fantastic person, and the maintenance person, Pat, is remembered as an awesome and helpful asset. The layout and features - such as a gated, key-code entry and a secured perimeter - contribute to a feeling of safety and privacy, with several reviewers calling the place "an oasis in the desert," "peaceful and gated," or simply "great" and "nice."

Within those favorable reflections, there is a strong emphasis on community and personal warmth. Reviewers often mention great neighbors and friends, a sense of quiet lodgings well suited to daily life, and a general atmosphere of cleanliness and security that makes the park feel like a settled, welcoming place to live. Some comparisons are more muted but still positive: it's described as a great park, a nice and friendly environment, and a closed-in, gated community that preserves a sense of privacy and order. For those who have experienced Ruby's management in particular, the sentiment is that good management contributes substantially to the park's appeal, with Ruby singled out as a standout figure in maintaining a pleasant living environment.

Yet the same pool of voices does not converge around a single narrative of management and ownership. Several reviewers acknowledge a shift in sentiment tied to changes in ownership. Phrases like "it used to be a good place but new owners don't care" hint at a decline in conditions and responsiveness after ownership changed hands. In these accounts, the on-site manager is still seen as a potential ally who tries to help, but there is a sense that the new ownership structure constrains what can be done, leaving residents feeling neglected or frustrated. Some comments go as far as labeling the situation as "not good" and describing a disconnect between resident needs and the new management approach, signaling a rift that can color otherwise positive memories of the park.

There are also very sharp negative perspectives that focus on governance, fairness, and living conditions. One review attacks the park as being run by a so-called "slum lord," implying systemic neglect and a pattern of mistreatment toward residents, with housing authorities allegedly unlikely to intervene. A particularly troubling account recounts a situation where a resident with criminal history disclosed upfront was initially told it would be fine to move in, only to be asked to leave after moving in with a disabled mother. The narrative includes specific maintenance failures - water pressure problems, broken doors and windows, missing weather stripping, no toilet seat, missing keys - and an air conditioning unit that would not shut off, allegedly due to bad insulation. The review frames this as a case of shady handling and inconsistent enforcement of rules, suggesting that the park's management can switch positions abruptly and harshly.

A subset of the stories describe extreme disrepair and allegations of wrongdoing that are hard to reconcile with the more favorable vibes some residents report. One particularly strong negative post paints the park as filthy and infested with cockroaches, with sewer smells permeating the trailer units, and even accusing the management of misplacing an appliance (a microwave) and misleading tenants about propane. The tone is accusatory and the situation is described as a pattern of taking tenants' money under questionable pretenses. Taken with the rest, this view underscores a deep tension between experiences of care and safety on the one hand and accusations of exploitation or neglect on the other, illustrating how the same place can feel like a secure haven to some and a source of outright distress to others.

Interwoven with the praise and the complaints is a simple, almost contradictory line that some reviewers still end on a high note: "Love this place. Great place to live." That line, paired with others, captures the paradox at the heart of these reflections. The park is cherished by some as a homey, secure enclave with responsive leaders and a supportive community, while to others it feels unsettled by ownership changes, maintenance lapses, and policies that seem arbitrary or unfair. In balanced terms, the reviews sketch a community with real potential and notable strengths - most notably the leadership of Ruby and the helpful presence of Pat, the sense of security from the gate and perimeter, and the overall cleanliness - yet shadowed by experiences of deterioration, governance disputes, and episodes of alleged mistreatment or neglect.

Overall, the picture is that of a place with a strong core - friendly residents, attentive on-site staff in some cases, and a secure, well-kept environment - that can transform quickly under different management philosophies. For some, the park remains a haven shaped by compassionate leadership and a close-knit neighborhood. For others, changes in ownership, inconsistent enforcement, and troubling maintenance issues have eroded confidence and trust, creating a stark contrast between what the space could be and what it has become for those who live there. The varied voices remind us that a living community is more than its buildings or gates; it lives in the daily interactions, the responsiveness of those who manage it, and the reliability of the basics - cleanliness, safety, and respect.

Restaurants

• Sombrero Mexican Food (0.1 miles)
• Church's Chicken (0.1 miles)
• McDonald's (0.2 miles)
• Fat Harvey's (0.2 miles)
• The Crossing Grill & Bar (0.3 miles)
• Las Herraduras Mexican Restaurant (0.3 miles)
• The Press Cafe & Bistro (0.3 miles)

Cafes

• The Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf (0.1 miles)
• Starbucks (0.7 miles)
• Starbucks (1.1 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (1.2 miles)

Physicians

• The Vein Center of Arizona (0.2 miles)
• Freimuth R M DDS Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (0.2 miles)
• Integrated Dermatology of Yuma (0.4 miles)
• Yuma Cardiac Center (0.4 miles)
• Up 2 Par Medical Clinic (0.4 miles)
• Advance Pediatric (0.5 miles)
• Arizona Counseling (0.5 miles)

Pharmacies

• Fry's Pharmacy (0.2 miles)
• Kachina Pharmacy (0.4 miles)
• Walgreens (0.4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.5 miles)
• Genoa Healthcare (0.5 miles)
• Grifols (0.8 miles)
• Albertsons Pharmacy (1.4 miles)

Hospitals

• YRMC Women & Children's Services (0.6 miles)
• Yuma Regional Medical Center Administration Building (0.7 miles)
• Palm View (0.7 miles)
• Tower 2 (0.8 miles)

Parks

• Smucker Park (0.8 miles)
• Kennedy Memorial Park (0.9 miles)

Places of Worship

• The Vertical Church (0.9 miles)