3206 Woodland Road, Marinette, WI 54143
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Sun Valley Homes II Marinette South Costs & Pricing
Sun Valley Homes II Marinette South offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to both Marinette County and the broader state of Wisconsin. With a monthly cost of $3,400 for a private room, Sun Valley Homes II is significantly more affordable than the county average of $4,000 and the state average of $4,339. Similarly, their pricing for a one-bedroom unit aligns well with local trends, priced at $3,400 - slightly above Marinette County's average of $3,320 but still favorable compared to the state figure of $3,412. Overall, Sun Valley Homes II Marinette South presents an inviting option for those seeking quality accommodations while maintaining mindful financial considerations.
| Floor plans | Sun Valley Homes II Marinette South | Marinette County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $3,400 | $4,000 | $4,339 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,400 | $3,320 | $3,412 |
Overall Review of Sun Valley Homes II Marinette South
Pros
The residents are taken care of.- The workers are great at what they do.
- The workers make sure the residents have fun things to do for the holidays.
- The workers are very kind.
Cons
The facility does not provide healthy food and is often out of food.- Rides to doctor appointments were promised but not provided due to lack of a van.
- The staff are under-staffed and not paid well, forcing them to cook, clean, and care for residents with little help.
- Upper management should be fired.
- The maintenance person is useless and rarely comes to Marinette.
- The rooms are cold in winter and require a heater to stay warm.
- They use RockMed, which is considered stupid; they should use the pharmacy.
- The Marinette facility is not worth going to until changes are made.
- Hotdogs and pizza are not good meals for the elderly.
Review
Sun Valley Homes II Marinette South seems best suited for seniors who need plain-vanilla supervision and prize personal warmth from frontline caregivers over a broad menu of structured activities or sophisticated services. The clearest asset in the feedback is the caring, hands-on work of the staff, who consistently go the extra mile for residents when it comes to holiday cheer and daily care. For families whose priority is a small, affordable setting where residents are treated with kindness and attended to directly by aides, this community can still feel like a capable, safe home. However, this comes with a practical caveat: the environment hinges on overburdened teams rather than on a robust, well-resourced program.
Those who would want to consider alternatives are families seeking reliable programming, strong management oversight, consistent meal quality, and dependable transportation to medical appointments. The reviews repeatedly flag a sparse activity calendar, with bingo as the only regular fixture, and point to gaps in logistics that affect daily life, most notably transportation that does not always materialize, and meals that fall short of residents’ nutritional expectations. For residents who require frequent social engagement, varied enrichment, or a predictable schedule that includes transportation and coordinated outings, a different community may deliver a more satisfying experience.
The best news here is that the staff’s commitment and resident-focused care do provide a meaningful offset to many operational shortcomings. Caregivers are described as kind and capable, taking initiative to brighten days and to fill gaps when resources are thin. Yet those positives do not fully neutralize the underlying constraints: persistent understaffing, night-shift safety concerns, and a management picture that many families would find unsettling. The sentiment that “the workers are great but stretched thin” captures the core tension, great people facing systemic limits, which means positive caregiver experiences can only go so far if key systems remain underdeveloped.
Operational gaps stand out as the decisive factors. Meals are reported as inconsistent, with concerns about food availability and quality, and the kitchen staff are often pressed into dual roles that strain both cooking and basic housekeeping. Rooms can be chilly in the winter, and maintenance issues are not consistently addressed, reinforcing a sense that comfort and reliability are uneven. Nighttime safety is particularly salient, with only a single worker on duty in some shifts, raising legitimate concerns about supervision and response times. The overall impression is of a caring, small-scale operation that needs stronger infrastructure and processes to truly deliver dependable, day-to-day quality.
From a decision perspective, families should weigh the warmth of the caregiving culture against the risk of ongoing gaps in programming, transportation, and maintenance. If the primary aim is budget-conscious care with attentive staff, Sun Valley Homes II Marinette South may fit. If the resident’s needs include a robust activity lineup, guaranteed and timely transportation to appointments, nutritious meals, and clearly demonstrated leadership accountability, alternatives deserve serious consideration. Prospective residents should demand concrete, up-to-date answers on staffing ratios, night coverage, transportation policies, meal menus, and service guarantees during tours.
In practice, a disciplined approach is warranted: tour the facility with a checklist focused on staffing coverage during peak and overnight hours, observe a dining service, inspect room temperatures, and ask for a current maintenance log and response times. Request written commitments from management about transportation arrangements, meal planning, and how activities are developed beyond bingo. If possible, talk to multiple families with residents there to verify consistency of care and reliability. The bottom line is clear: the community works best for residents who value compassionate, hands-on care and can tolerate limited programming; for those who must have consistent programming, reliable transport, and strong leadership, it is prudent to explore alternatives while keeping the door open for a careful reassessment after a trial period.
15 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Hospice waiver
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Why Do Dementia Patients Sleep So Much? Understanding Oversleeping, Stages, and Care Approaches
8 Key Indicators That Suggest It May Be Time to Transition from Assisted Living to Skilled Nursing Care
Nourishing the Mind: Essential Dietary Approaches for Dementia