155 Beth Court, Burlington, WI 53105
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Calebria House (Community Based Residential Facility) Costs & Pricing
Calebria House, a Community Based Residential Facility, offers a range of accommodation options at prices that reflect the specialized care and amenities provided. The facility's private rooms are priced between $3,000 and $5,999 per month, significantly higher than the average cost in Walworth County ($3,886) and Wisconsin as a whole ($4,339). For those considering semi-private accommodations, Calebria House charges $4,315, which also exceeds the county's average of $3,289 and the state's average of $3,977. Studio apartments at Calebria are priced at $5,125 per month - again surpassing both local and state costs ($3,713 and $3,999 respectively). These figures indicate that while Calebria House may be on the higher end of the pricing spectrum compared to its regional counterparts, it likely reflects the quality of services offered tailored to meet the needs of its residents.
| Floor plans | Calebria House (Community Based Residential Facility) | Walworth County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $3,000 to $5,999 | $3,886 | $4,339 |
| Semi-Private | $4,315 | $3,289 | $3,977 |
| Studio | $5,125 | $3,713 | $3,999 |
Overall Review of Calebria House (Community Based Residential Facility)
Cons
There was nothing good about the experience at Calebria House; it was heart-wrenching for the entire family.
The facility advertised dementia expertise and compassionate care, but it had no real experience in dealing with the disease.
The staff showed no compassion toward the resident and secluded her to her room, including during meals, due to delirium from a urinary tract infection.
Mr. Wasmund indicated he needed to keep the resident away from other residents, revealing a troubling approach to behavioral care.
Mr. Wasmund claimed the mother was misdiagnosed, showing a lack of knowledge about dementia and memory care.
The mother had to leave the facility in less than a week.
There were discrepancies between the facility’s advertising and the reality of its amenities and care.
A complaint was filed with the State of Wisconsin for failing to follow rules and regulations in caring for the mother.
Review
Calebria House in Burlington, Wisconsin is best suited for seniors who require only light supervision and do not have meaningful memory-care needs, and who prioritize a small, home-like setting over a larger, more clinical environment. The idea of intimate staffing and individualized attention may appeal to families seeking a warm, less institutional vibe. However, one family’s account sharply undermines that fit: a resident with dementia allegedly did not receive appropriate, dementia-focused care, was secluded during meals, and ultimately had to leave, with the operator reportedly challenging the dementia diagnosis and facing a state complaint. That narrative signals a misalignment between advertised capabilities and on-the-ground practice, especially for memory-impaired residents.
Explicitly, families should consider alternatives if memory care is part of the need package. The review points to serious red flags around the facility’s ability to handle dementia and behavioral issues, including an assertion that staff lacked dementia expertise and that the provider did not follow state rules. For anyone evaluating Calebria House as a memory-care option, the prudent conclusion is to pursue facilities with verified memory-care designations, documented staff training in behavioral therapies, transparent care plans, and cleaner regulatory records. In short, true memory care with trained professionals and proven oversight should be sought elsewhere.
The limited positives that might accompany a small, residential setting do not meaningfully offset the central concerns raised. If there is any perceived benefit to a home-like environment or closer, more personal interactions, those advantages are overwhelmed by the reported failures in dementia care, the claim of misdiagnosis, the decision to isolate a resident, and the rapid removal of a loved one. The gap between what is advertised, memory-care capabilities and specialized behavioral therapies, and what was experienced erodes trust in the facility’s ability to manage progressive cognitive decline, which is precisely where families most need reliability and escalation protocols.
The strongest cons are concrete and actionable. The reviewer alleges a lack of dementia-specific expertise among staff, which is unacceptable for residents with memory impairment. Allegations that a resident was secluded during meals, and that a diagnosis dispute was used to justify removal, strike at the core promises of compassionate, continuous memory care. A formal complaint with the State of Wisconsin Department of Quality Assurance further signals regulatory concerns and a risk of noncompliance with established care standards. Finally, the disparity between advertising claims and actual practice creates a credibility gap that makes it difficult to trust the facility with vulnerable loved ones.
To protect a loved one, prospective families should conduct a rigorous diligence process. Ask for detailed staff credentials, including memory-care training, certification, and ongoing education. Request a current care plan that explicitly addresses memory-related symptoms, wandering, agitation, sleep, and meals, plus a clear escalation protocol for behavioral crises. Check the latest state QA records, survey results, and any open complaints, and insist on speaking with front-line caregivers and supervisors during a tour. Visit at mealtimes and during peak hours to observe whether residents are engaged, respected, and given choices, and assess whether confinement or isolation practices are avoided. Finally, compare Calebria House with nearby licensed memory-care facilities that publish outcomes, staffing ratios, and resident rights protections.
Bottom-line: based on the account available, Calebria House is not a dependable choice for memory-care needs. It may be conceivable for seniors who truly require minimal supervision and happen to be without memory impairment, but for those facing dementia or complex behavioral challenges, alternatives with proven dementia expertise, stricter regulatory compliance, and transparent caregiver training are essential. Families should prioritize facilities with verified memory-care capabilities, staff who demonstrate sustained competency in behavioral health, and documented success in keeping residents safe, engaged, and appropriately challenged. In the decision matrix, Calebria House sits on the wrong side of the risk/reward line for memory-impaired seniors and should be approached with caution or passed over in favor of stronger options.





Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
How to Communicate with a Loved One Living with Dementia: 10 Supportive Strategies
Comprehensive Guide to VA Nursing Homes: A Crucial Long-Term Care Resource for Veterans