1025 West 470 North, Price, UT 84501
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Beehive Homes Of Price
Pros
The facility offers 24-hour nursing and CNAs and is not crowded.
The facility is very clean.
Rooms are spacious and residents can furnish them themselves.
The facility offers activities such as singalongs, crafts, games, and music.
The facility provides therapies for residents.
The staff are very kind.
The staff arranges outings to museums and parks.
Caregivers are well trained and demonstrate kindness, compassion, and empathy.
Bathrooms are cleaned regularly.
Requests for help are addressed quickly.
It is a five-star facility.
Under new management, the center is doing terrific and the administrator is involved in all aspects of resident care.
Cons
Some staff members are lazy and outside all the time while on shift.
The new owner and administrator have completely let the place fall apart; it isnāt as clean as before.
Staff are on their cell phones constantly.
Medications are not ordered or administered on time.
Laundry is always stale smelling or missing.
There is huge turnover in staff/CNAs.
Evening and nighttime staff run around with no shoes on.
The owner is incredibly worthless and doesnāt care about concerns.
Review
Beehive Homes of Price is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like assisted living where residents receive attentive, hands-on care without the bustle of a larger campus. The community is notably not crowded, and 24/7 nursing and CNA coverage is a central strength, offering real reassurance for those who prioritize constant oversight. Residents typically have private rooms that can be personalized with familiar furniture, contributing to a sense of ownership and comfort. Daily life features simple, engaging activities, singalongs, crafts, games, and guided outings, that create a predictable, social rhythm. For families valuing a warm, intimate atmosphere with consistent staff presence, this site can feel like the right fit.
The strongest practical advantages lie in a caring staff culture and a clean, lived-in environment. Reviews repeatedly highlight kindness, compassion, and empathy from caregivers, along with prompt responses to requests for help. The facility emphasizes a āhomeā mood, with administrators who engage with residents and aim to maintain a welcoming, well-kept living space. Food is repeatedly praised, framed as freshly prepared and tasty, which matters for residents who rely on routine meals as a daily source of comfort. The combination of intimate rooms, a large communal area, and a steady stream of activities creates meaningful opportunities for social connections and a sense of normalcy.
Yet, the experience is inseparable from management stability, and here the messaging from reviewers diverges. Some praise fresh leadership for hands-on involvement and improved care, while others report a sharp decline after a change in ownership. The most troubling critiques focus on basic operational lapses: inconsistent cleaning, delayed or missed medications, and staff turnover that seems to destabilize routine. Several accounts describe employees who are not CNAs, or who appear distracted by non-work duties, raising questions about daily caregiving consistency. The most pointed warnings come from families who felt the new administration prioritized dollars over resident well-being, suggesting that the long-term quality of care is highly contingent on leadership at any given moment.
Those competing signals matter because the pros can offset meaningful risk only if management remains reliably engaged and staffing stays stable. The home-like atmosphere and the 24/7 caregiving presence remain powerful anchors for residents who need steady supervision and where small missteps can be mitigated by familiar staff. Strong daily rhythms, a comfortable common area, and the ability to personalize a private room help preserve dignity and autonomy even as health needs evolve. However, when supervision drops or staff morale sags, the same strengths rapidly lose their cushion, and anxiety around care quality can erode the very benefits that drew families to the community in the first place.
Alternatives are worth considering for families prioritizing ironclad consistency and transparent, long-term governance. If memory care needs or specialized medical oversight are paramount, or if a resident requires highly predictable medication management and hourly monitoring, exploring other options with a track record of stable administration may be prudent. Prospective residents who want a larger, more resource-rich campus with formalized quality assurance processes might also find a steadier fit elsewhere. Beehive Homes of Price will appeal to those who prize a homey feel and personal touches, but families should assess whether leadership continuity and housekeeping standards align with long-range expectations before committing.
Practical next steps for decision-makers are clear. Schedule a face-to-face with the new administrator or current leadership and request candid tours during different times of day. Talk to current residents and their families about daily routines, med pass timing, and cleaning standards, and review the latest incident logs or corrective action plans if available. Observe meal service, the attentiveness of aides during routine activities, and how quietly the staff coordinate during shift changes. Establish a short list of non-negotiables, medication timing, restroom and hygiene routines, and the pace of daily activities, and verify them against what is observed in real time. This disciplined due diligence will reveal whether Beehive Homes of Price can deliver consistent, compassionate care day in and day out.







Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs