Harris Grove Retirement Home

Pros

• The family member is taking proactive steps to ensure their mom receives the care she needs by planning to relocate her this month.
• The initial choice of the facility was made with good intentions, as it seemed like a suitable alternative to a nursing home.
• The family member recognizes their mother's previous progress and independence, highlighting her ability to walk with guidance when she first arrived.
• There is a strong desire from the family member to advocate for better care and support for their loved one, demonstrating love and commitment.
• The family member seems motivated to ensure that their mother receives appropriate 24-hour care in a more supportive environment moving forward.

Cons

• The owner exhibits rudeness and a lack of professionalism in her interactions with families.
• The facilities are poorly maintained and do not meet acceptable care standards.
• Residents are isolated, with the owner refusing to allow family members to visit their loved ones.
• Staff members lack proper training and do not provide adequate care, leading to neglectful treatment of residents.
• Patients are treated inappropriately, such as being tied to chairs instead of receiving the necessary support for mobility.
• Hygiene standards are alarmingly low, resulting in residents' hair becoming matted and potentially needing shaving.
• Caregivers show little regard for safety protocols, such as wearing masks during the pandemic.
• The environment is more focused on keeping residents out of sight rather than providing compassionate care or support.

Review

The experience of placing a loved one in a care facility is often fraught with anxiety and hope, particularly when seeking an environment that promises safety and compassion. However, for one family, the reality of their mother's situation has been far from what they envisioned. Initially, this care home seemed like a decent choice—allowing residents to avoid traditional nursing homes while offering specialized support. Yet, over the span of three years, conditions have deteriorated significantly, transforming what was once perceived as a nurturing environment into a place where dignity and care seem to have vanished.

When the mother first arrived at the facility three years ago, she demonstrated remarkable resilience; within just 21 days of her arrival, she could stand with assistance. However, her condition has worsened dramatically since then. Despite being capable of using the restroom independently, caregivers inexplicably insist on using diapers instead. This shift not only signals a decline in her personal dignity but raises alarming questions about the level of individualized care provided by staff members who appear woefully untrained. Without adequate support or understanding, her basic needs are overlooked—a clear indication that this institution is failing its purpose.

Adding to these concerns is the setting itself: rather than providing a comforting space conducive to recovery and well-being, it has devolved into an area akin to a garage where doors are shut tight against cries for help. The isolation imposed by these physical barriers suggests an atmosphere where residents can feel neglected and unheard—a disheartening reality for individuals who rely entirely on caregivers for their daily needs. Furthermore, instead of prioritizing compassionate engagement with residents like this family member’s mother during challenging times like a pandemic, caregivers neglect crucial health protocols such as wearing masks around vulnerable populations.

Even more troubling is evidence suggesting that staff may prioritize convenience over compassion. Reports indicate instances where patients have been restrained—tied to chairs with sheets—rather than supervised appropriately during mobility activities indoors. Such methods raise serious ethical concerns regarding treatment practices and highlight an alarming lack of respect for individual autonomy in such settings. Care should center around creating supportive environments conducive to mobility improvement rather than resorting to punitive measures reminiscent of outdated institutional practices.

As if these issues were not distressing enough, additional observations hint at general negligence regarding hygiene and personal care standards within the facility. The mother’s hair has become so matted that shaving may soon be necessary—a symbol of how little attention caregivers pay to grooming or maintaining residents’ appearances. This deterioration also reflects a broader disregard for residents' emotional well-being; suffering from poor hygiene can lead to feelings of shame or depression among those who depend on others for assistance.

At the heart of these grievances lies an owner whose authoritarian attitude exacerbates tensions between staff and families seeking involvement in their loved ones' lives. Refusal to allow family visits underlines an unsettling trend toward isolationism within caregiver facilities—a philosophy that undermines familial bonds essential during difficult transitions in life stages involving age-related decline or disability. As families wrestle with guilt over their decisions while longing for genuine connections outside institutional walls filled with echoes instead of empathy, it becomes abundantly clear: this facility cannot fulfill its promise as anything remotely resembling home-like comfort amidst growing distress.

In conclusion, after witnessing firsthand both physical deterioration and psychological distress experienced by loved ones in this specific care home system over several years now—the decision has been made: it’s time to take action towards finding appropriate alternatives that prioritize 24-hour professional support tailored specifically around each resident's distinct needs rather than mere containment until death occurs without dignity afforded throughout one's later stages off life lived there indefinitely en masse aside undeterred owners exhibiting little regard whatsoever towards fundamental human rights expecting seniors entrusted therein experience enrichment rather than abandonment guaranteed upon initial placements sought out initially via marketing ploys promising something else entirely different altogether!

Places of Worship

• Green Grove Baptist Church (5.4 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (5.9 miles)
• Bethelehem Baptist Church (7.2 miles)
• Mount Olive Baptist Church (7.5 miles)
• Mt Olive CME Church (8.3 miles)
• Parks Church (8.7 miles)
• First United Pentecostal Church (10.2 miles)

Restaurants

• Los Portales Bolivar (8.4 miles)
• Chicago Jerk House (10.2 miles)
• McDonald's (10.5 miles)
• Taco Bell (10.5 miles)
• Sonic Drive-In (10.8 miles)
• Diana's Cakes (12.2 miles)
• Huddle House (16.6 miles)

Transportation

• Executive Aircraft International (9.5 miles)
• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (19.3 miles)
• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (19.6 miles)
• Alamo (20.5 miles)

Pharmacies

• Southern Express Pharmacy (9.9 miles)
• Hatchie Clinic (10.2 miles)
• Hatchie Pharmacy (10.2 miles)
• Hudson Drug Store (10.2 miles)
• Good Neighbor Pharmacy (10.6 miles)
• Super Drugs (10.7 miles)
• Fred's Pharmacy (11.2 miles)

Physicians

• Bolivar Medical Clinic (10.2 miles)
• West Tennessee Medical Group (10.2 miles)
• West Tennessee Area Health Education Center (10.6 miles)
• The Thrasher Clinic (11.4 miles)
• Somerville Medical Clinic (11.4 miles)
• Elite Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (11.5 miles)
• McKnight Clinic (11.5 miles)

Hospitals

• West Tennessee Healthcare Bolivar Hospital (10.2 miles)
• Medical Center Home Health And Hospice Of Bolivar (10.2 miles)
• Bolivar General Hospital (10.2 miles)

Cafes

• Common Ground Cafe and Co. (10.9 miles)
• Biscuitry (11 miles)