Guardian Angel AFH I & II

Pros

• The reviewer is grateful for the facility's staff who cared for their father during his last year.
• The environment is described as humane and positive.

Cons

• This facility is described as the last place a loved one should be placed.
• The staff barely fed the patients.
• They allegedly kept the patient in bed and moved the wheelchair out of the room so he would stay in bed.
• The patient had multiple ER visits (six or seven) due to choking or falls while in their care.
• They allegedly stretched the truth about the patient's behavior.
• The reviewer warns others not to go to this place.

Review

A person expresses a mix of gratitude and alarm about a facility that was involved in caring for a loved one during his last year. On one hand, there is appreciation for the people at the facility who provided what was described as a humane and positive environment during a difficult time. The opening sentiment acknowledges that the staff did tremendous care for the father, and the overall tone recognizes kindness and humanity. Yet that warmth sits beside a stark warning for anyone who cares about their own family: this is not the place you want to entrust with a loved one.

The reviewer explains that the trajectory of care began with a different arrangement - the first foster home had been doing well, but the owner's health forced a move to another facility. Within this narrative, the father-in-law's health concerns are laid out clearly: he has swallowing issues, some concerning behaviors, and is a fall risk. These risk factors become central to the reviewer's critique, framing why the choice of care setting mattered so much and why some of the subsequent events felt especially distressing to the family.

A specific incident is recounted to illustrate the fragility of the situation. When the family visited, the father-in-law asked for help hooking up his TV, and the facility advertised access to streaming services like Netflix and Hulu. The password was needed to connect the device, but the owner reportedly shrugged, saying, "I don't know anything about that," and walked away. The reviewer frames this as more than a minor lack of service; it signaled a broader pattern of inattention and a lack of readiness to meet basic daily needs, suggesting that the care environment might not be as prepared or responsive as it should be for someone with the man's health considerations.

The reviewer provides a troubling timeline that raises serious concerns about safety and medical oversight. From February through April of 2021, the father-in-law was sent to the emergency room at least six or seven times, primarily due to choking incidents or falls. This pattern is presented not as isolated mishaps but as part of a larger narrative about inadequate monitoring and insufficient support for critical risk factors. The repeated ER visits are cited as a tangible measure of the care gaps experienced, and the reviewer implies that these incidents were not only dangerous but also emblematic of a system that failed to protect him consistently.

Another troubling claim centers on how the facility represented the father-in-law's behavior. The reviewer contends that the staff or owners stretched the truth about his conduct, a tactic that made it harder for the family to locate a new, more suitable placement nearby. This portrayal suggests a deliberate mischaracterization that complicated important decisions about safety and care transitions, leaving the family feeling misled at a time when transparency was desperately needed.

Even more troubling, the reviewer describes a shift in how the father-in-law was managed within the facility. They claim that staff started keeping him in bed and removed his wheelchair from the room, effectively confining him so he would have less need to be attended to. This specific claim paints a picture of deliberate containment rather than care, implying a readiness to limit movement and interaction as a way to manage the patient rather than to support his mobility and dignity. Such actions, if true, would be particularly troubling given his noted fall risk and swallowing issues.

Against this backdrop of perceived neglect, the reviewer makes a blunt assessment: the facility "absolutely sucks." They charge that the patients were barely fed and that the staff did not provide meaningful assistance to their grandfather. The closing sentiment is a clear warning to others: do not choose this place. The combination of perceived neglect, risky incidents, and a sense of being misled about the patient's condition culminates in a decisive recommendation to avoid the facility altogether.

In sum, the review blends appreciation for the kindness of some staff with a thorough, troubling indictment of the care environment. It highlights serious concerns about safety, responsiveness, and ethical candor, culminating in a strong cautions summary for families considering this facility. The takeaways emphasize that even when the atmosphere feels humane, persistent gaps in daily support, mobility, feeding, and accurate communication can dramatically affect a vulnerable loved one's well-being.

Places of Worship

• Landmark Church (0.2 miles)
• Calvary Church On The Bay (0.4 miles)
• First Baptist Church (0.6 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (0.6 miles)
• Holy Redeemer Catholic Church (1.1 miles)
• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (1.4 miles)
• Zion Baptist Church (1.4 miles)

Cafes

• Dutch Bros Coffee (0.4 miles)
• Bridgeview Coffee Roasters (0.4 miles)
• The Human Bean (0.4 miles)
• Aromas (0.5 miles)
• Timbers Cafe (1.4 miles)
• Metro Bru (1.6 miles)
• Bayshore Daily Grind (2.8 miles)

Restaurants

• Tai's Dynasty (0.4 miles)
• Alder Smokehouse (0.4 miles)
• North Bend Lanes Bowling Center (0.4 miles)
• Taco Bell (0.4 miles)
• Burgers N More (0.5 miles)
• The Avenue (0.5 miles)
• Humboldt Club (0.5 miles)

Transportation

• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (0.4 miles)
• Bay Area Hospital Heliport (0.9 miles)
• Hertz Rent A Car (1 miles)
• Ocean Air Aviation (1 miles)
• Southwest Oregon Regional Airport (OTH) (1.1 miles)
• Yellow Cab Taxi (1.8 miles)
• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (2.9 miles)

Parks

• Boynton Park (1.4 miles)
• Business Licenses, Parks Streets Planning & Zoning Wastewater Enginee (3.1 miles)
• John Topits Park (3.1 miles)
• Mingus Park (3.1 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.5 miles)

Physicians

• Bay Eye Clinic PC (1.7 miles)
• South Coast Orthopaedic Associates PC (1.7 miles)
• South Coast Surgery Center (1.7 miles)
• Charles G. Hurbis, M.D., FACS (1.7 miles)
• Bay Clinic (1.8 miles)
• Barnhart Prosthetic and Orthotic Services (1.8 miles)
• Bay Area Hospital Psychiatric Services (1.8 miles)

Hospitals

• Bay Area Hospital (1.7 miles)
• Bay Area Hospital (2 miles)
• Coquille Valley Hospital Home Health (16 miles)

Theaters

• Egyptian Theatre (3.2 miles)