9320 SW Davies Road, Beaverton, OR 97008
To contact a resident: (503) 579-8880
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Aurora Care Home Costs & Pricing
Aurora Care Home offers competitive pricing for its private room accommodations, setting the monthly cost at $2,800. This rate is notably lower than both the average costs in Washington County, which stand at approximately $3,261, and the statewide average in Oregon, where private rooms typically reach around $3,424. By choosing Aurora Care Home, residents can enjoy quality care in a comfortable setting while benefiting from significant savings compared to other options within the county and state. This makes it an attractive choice for families seeking affordable yet high-quality care solutions.
| Floor plans | Aurora Care Home | Washington County | Oregon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $2,800 | $3,261 | $3,424 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Aurora Care Home
Pros
This place is wonderful with amazing people and a beautiful/clean environment.
My dad stayed here for 2 years and was very happy and well cared for.
Maria and her staff are very polite and professional.
The owner and her husband leave a very good impression.
The outdoor space is very nice with a lawn, flowers, and patio area.
Cons
The place was dark and uninviting.
Cleanliness was mediocre.
The staff were not very friendly.
My mother was too active for them.
She was talked down to about having too many visitors and being too noisy.
The food situation is not ideal for elderly people.
The other residents at this care facility, due to their health conditions, didn't speak much or at all.
Room available is very small, and without private bathroom.
Review
Aurora Care Home in Beaverton is best suited for families seeking a warm, home-like setting where a steady, hands-on caregiving team delivers attentive daily support, and where outdoor space and a calm, lived-in environment matter more than resort-style amenities. The model rewards routine, consistency, and personal attention over institutional breadth. The strongest testimonials center on Maria as the compassionate daily point person, with several families noting that their relatives were treated with genuine care. A resident who stayed there for two years reportedly thrived, and visiting families consistently describe feeling welcomed, which matters for ongoing involvement and peace of mind.
However, there are clear reasons to explore alternatives. For seniors who require larger living spaces, private bathrooms, more robust social programming, or highly flexible visiting policies, other communities may be a better fit. One review flags a very small room without a private bath, which can be unsuitable for longer stays. Another account emphasizes a darker, less inviting atmosphere and a staff dynamic that did not feel friendly to that family. Diet and meal quality also appear uneven, with canned or pre-prepared options that may not meet specialized dietary needs. These issues matter when daily comfort and dignity hinge on meals, space, and social vitality.
On the upside, the core strength lies in the caregiving culture. Maria and her team are described as polite, professional, and deeply caring, creating a sense of trust and continuity that many families value. The home environment is repeatedly characterized as beautiful and well maintained, with outdoor spaces such as a lawn and patio contributing to daily life and well-being. The ownersâ hands-on approach comes through in praise from families and the impression of a stable, long-running operation. In essence, residents tend to feel seen and attended to, and visits are welcomed in spirit, even if some policies can create friction.
Despite the positives, the main cons can limit the experience. Cleanliness has been labeled mediocre by at least one reviewer, and the interior ambiance has been described as dark and uninviting by others. A mismatch between a residentâs activity level and the homeâs capabilities surfaced in one account, underscoring a potential struggle for highly active seniors. Visiting restrictions and the perception of being admonished for extended visits generated emotional strain for families. Meals did not satisfy certain dietary requirements, relying on frozen, microwaved fare rather than freshly prepared options. Finally, some rooms are small and lack private bathrooms, which can hinder comfort and privacy over time.
The fit here hinges on alignment between priorities and realities. The strongest asset, genuine, consistent caregiving, can substantially offset a number of physical and social constraints for the right resident. For seniors who prize a familiar routine, a trusted caregiver, and a peaceful, garden-like atmosphere, these trade-offs may be worthwhile. The ability to develop a real relationship with staff and to know whom to contact with concerns matters deeply when family involvement is part of the rhythm. The outdoor space and clean grounds further support well-being and practical daily living, even if some amenities are modest by larger community standards.
Bottom-line guidance: Aurora Care Home is a practical, confident choice for families prioritizing personal attention, continuity, and a home-like feel in a Beaverton setting. It fits residents who can live with a compact room, no private bath, a quieter social scene, and a potential need to navigate visiting policies with sensitivity. Prospective residents should arrange face-to-face meetings, inspect room options, and discuss dietary accommodations and daily activities in detail. If high-touch caregiving with a stable operator is the priority, this community delivers; if, instead, extensive social programming, larger living spaces, or flexible visitation are non-negotiables, other assisted living options should be pursued.















Comprehensive Insights and Practical Strategies to Help Older Adults Avoid Falls
6 Crucial Ways an Elder Law Attorney Assists Families
Navigating the Tax Landscape of Caregiving: Credits, Deductions, and Beyond