International Towers in Youngstown, OH

Pros

• They love living at International Towers and wouldn’t trade it for anything.
• The management does their job very well.
• International Towers is the place to be.
• They love living there; the staff, apartments, and people are great.
• They note prompt repairs and improved amenities such as central heat/AC and laundry facilities.

Cons

• The building has no working HVAC, elevators that malfunction, and filthy hallways.
• The place is described as one of the worst, with cleaners not doing their job and staff not caring about residents.
• The area is not safe due to drug use, violence, suicides, and break-ins, with management ignoring complaints.
• The security measures are questionable, with cameras believed to be dummy and the lobby intercom not working.
• The property is labeled a big dump, and residents are planning to move soon.

Review

International Towers in Youngstown is best suited for budget-conscious adults who want straightforward apartment living and rely on a hands-on property team to address issues quickly. The community tends to appeal to residents who value practical conveniences, affordable rents, responsive maintenance, and a sense of activity in the building, over polished finishes or modern infrastructure. Long-tenured residents describe management as capable and accessible, and a few notes highlight friendly neighbors and solid in-unit features. For seniors or disabled adults on SSI who need a reachable staff and quick fixes when something breaks, this property can feel like a practical compromise between cost and service. It is not a luxury residence; it is a work-ready community.

Those who may want to consider alternatives include individuals who cannot tolerate unsafe areas, persistent odors, or unreliable basics like HVAC and elevators. Several reviews raise red flags about safety: drug activity, break-ins, and a sense of danger in the neighborhood and inside units. Questions about whether cameras and intercoms are functional create a perception of weak security. If consistent cleanliness, modern building systems, and a calm environment are non-negotiable, exploring other properties, potentially newer or better-vetted, will likely pay off. The community offers certain perks, but not at a level suitable for every lifestyle.

On the upside, management and staff frequently emerge as the strongest lever for quality of life. When issues are reported, repairs are described as prompt, with residents noting that nothing lingers for long. The maintenance team is seen as dependable, and this responsiveness can make daily life more tolerable amid other flaws. The atmosphere can feel active and social, with conversations about available apartments and a sense that routine demands are handled efficiently. Functional, practical apartments and better laundry facilities relative to some peers contribute to a workable living experience for those who value efficiency over luxury.

Yet the drawbacks pull hard against these advantages. The most persistent concerns center on infrastructure that seems past its prime: air conditioning not functioning building-wide, unreliable elevators, and hallways that feel dirty or neglected. Odors and stained common areas show up in several accounts, while others accuse management of indifference toward ongoing problems like drug activity and break-ins. Security is a recurring worry, with references to outdated or nonfunctional cameras and intercoms, which undercuts trust in the building’s safety. Across multiple reviews, these issues are treated as systemic rather than episodic, coloring the overall impression.

Thus, the pros offset some risks when maintenance is consistently capable and staff remains accessible; the ability to fix problems quickly is valuable when daily life is disrupted by faulty systems. However, the scale and persistence of the cons can overwhelm these positives. If reliable heat, safe conditions, and dependable transit between floors cannot be assured, even frequent repairs feel like temporary fixes. For those who prize safety and predictability, the realities here may prove too volatile. For renters prioritizing affordability and a responsive management team, the positives can justify a stay, but with clear expectations about reliability and risk.

Practical guidance for families weighing this option: verify the current status of HVAC and elevator service before committing, and tour at different hours to gauge noise, activity, and cleanliness. Speak with current residents about safety, intercoms, and camera visibility, and probe whether issues tend to be resolved quickly or linger. Compare overall monthly costs to nearby properties that offer stronger security and more modern systems, and consider whether a more controlled community with better safety and updated infrastructure is worth the trade-off. Alternatives in the area may provide greater peace of mind if stability and security are non-negotiable, even at a higher price point. International Towers remains a viable option for cost-conscious renters who value responsive management, but it does not deliver the reliability and safety profile that many buyers and families require.