150 County Road 34, Arthur, ND 58006
To contact a resident: (701) 967-8316
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Good Samaritan Society - Arthur - Prairie Villa Costs & Pricing
Good Samaritan Society - Arthur - Prairie Villa offers competitive pricing for its accommodations, reflecting a commitment to quality care and comfortable living. For a one-bedroom unit, the monthly cost is $3,845, which is higher than both the county average of $3,287 and slightly above the state average of $3,800. Meanwhile, their two-bedroom option is priced at $4,845, significantly above Cass County's average of $3,210 and North Dakota's average of $3,966. This suggests that while Good Samaritan Society may charge a premium compared to local and state benchmarks, residents benefit from enhanced services and amenities that align with their values of compassion and community well-being.
| Floor plans | Good Samaritan Society - Arthur - Prairie Villa | Cass County | North Dakota |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $3,845 | $3,287 | $3,800 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $4,845 | $3,210 | $3,966 |
Overall Review of Good Samaritan Society - Arthur - Prairie Villa
Pros
They loved and missed the friends they got to meet there.
They hope to visit them again.
They appreciated the employees and nurses.
Review
Good Samaritan Society - Arthur - Prairie Villa is best suited for seniors who prioritize social engagement and a warm, personable caregiving culture. In Arthur, ND, this community comes across as a place where residents quickly form friendships and neighbors look out for one another. The most telling feedback centers on meaningful connections, people meeting friends, staying in touch with each other, and valuing the presence of staff who are approachable. The sentiment about employees and nurses is strongly positive, signaling a caregiving team that appears genuinely attentive and accessible. For families seeking a home where companionship drives daily life and staff engagement feels authentic, Prairie Villa presents a compelling fit.
That said, those who require a higher level of medical oversight or a broader continuum of care should audition alternatives with more explicit clinical depth. The available input does not outline a full spectrum of medical services, rehabilitation strengths, or specialized programs. Prospective residents who anticipate needing intensive therapy, memory care, post-acute recovery, or highly structured clinical oversight may want to compare Prairie Villa against facilities with clearly defined, robust medical offerings and dedicated memory care wings. In short, Prairie Villa may not be the strongest match for residents whose primary need is advanced clinical intervention rather than social affinity and day-to-day companionship.
The clear advantages evident from the limited but favorable feedback center on social life and staff warmth. Residents appear to benefit from peer networks that foster daily interaction, while the caregiving team, particularly nurses and other frontline staff, seems to deliver approachable, compassionate support. That combination, friendship-rich living alongside consistently kind caregiving, can substantially enhance quality of life, reduce feelings of isolation, and create a sense of belonging that many families struggle to achieve in other settings. For many seniors, these soft metrics are not merely comforts; they are essential components of sustained well-being.
Yet the absence of explicit downsides in the available review means potential gaps remain unquantified. Families should actively probe for clarity on what Prairie Villa can and cannot offer: the depth and cadence of rehabilitation services, access to specialists, availability of memory care programming, transportation, dining variety, and the extent of on-site activities. Without concrete answers, the risk is a mismatch between expectations and reality, especially for residents who require structured routines, predictable care plans, or a wider array of therapeutic options. This is not to disparage the community, but to emphasize the need for thorough due diligence when care requirements extend beyond companionship and basic daily assistance.
The strong social fabric and evident staff responsiveness can offset certain gaps for many families, but they do not erase the need for alignment on care specifics. If a resident thrives in a social, community-driven environment and relies on attentive, approachable staff to monitor daily needs, Prairie Villa offers a persuasive proposition. The key is to verify access to necessary services and to confirm that the care model matches the anticipated trajectory of health and independence. A disciplined discovery process, meeting current residents, reviewing activity calendars, and obtaining transparent staffing ratios and care plans, will illuminate whether the positive intangibles are matched by the medical and rehabilitative supports required.
Ultimately, a practical decision favors Prairie Villa for families who value warmth, community, and authentic caregiver connections as the core experience of aging in place. It is a solid recommendation for those who want meaningful social engagement and who feel confident in the stability and kindness of the staff. For families prioritizing advanced clinical services, memory-care specialization, or a broader continuum of care, alternatives should be explored with equal rigor. A guided tour, direct conversations with the caregiving team, and a candid review of scheduling, programming, and costs will reveal where Prairie Villa fits within the broader landscape of senior living options in the region.










Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.
An Extensive Exploration of the VA Aid and Attendance Benefit