Fremont Rest Center in Fremont, NC

Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby

• from +$100 / mo

  Parkwood Village

  4.6 from 30 reviews

  $2,600 to $4,785 / month

  12.9 miles away
• from +$450 / mo

  Eagle's Pointe

  4 from 30 reviews

  $2,950 to $3,750 / month

  9.7 miles away
• About the same

  Somerset Court of Goldsboro

  3.9 from 21 reviews

  $2,500 to $7,081 / month

  9.6 miles away
• from +$150 / mo

  Meadowview

  3.7 from 21 reviews

  $2,650 to $3,800 / month

  22.0 miles away
• About the same

  Snow Hill Assisted Living

  4.2 from 5 reviews

  $2,500 to $3,000 / month

  19.1 miles away

Pros

• The rooms are neat and organized.
• They really care about the people here.
• The building is clean and the food is great.
• The location is nice and quiet.
• The staff are great and the building is well kept.
• It is a wonderful place to live.
• Residents appear happy, which is the main goal.

Cons

• The facility is described as a nasty place infested with bed bugs.
• The facility is described as absolutely horrible and a bed bug hotel, with residents in poor condition and the owners failing them.
• The facility is described as very unprofessional, with no cleaning supplies, neglected patients, bugs, and no hand soap.
• The rooms and restrooms are described as not cleaned all weekend, with garbage overflowing in residents' rooms.
• Staff are described as rude and not helpful, and residents appear to have not had a bath.
• Residents are observed roaming, drinking alcohol, and urinating in the street and yards.

Review

This community is best suited for families seeking a low-cost option with visible social vitality, where a quiet, small-town setting and active visitation can matter as much as formal care. When viewed through that lens, Fremont Rest Center can feel like a sincere, community-oriented place: rooms that appear neat, a building that is well maintained, and regular activities plus family-oriented events that keep residents engaged. For residents who do not require high-intensity clinical oversight and who can tolerate variability in basic care, the mix of friendly staff in some shifts and accessible programming can feel workable. Yet the fit hinges on accepting a degree of inconsistency in cleanliness, staffing reliability, and overall care oversight.

Those weighing alternatives should note a substantial risk profile in this facility. Families needing predictable cleanliness, rigorous infection control, and steady, well-trained staffing should look elsewhere. The most frequently repeated concerns center on sanitation and resident hygiene, with reports of bed bugs, dirty restrooms, overflowing garbage, and little ice or basic supplies. Several accounts describe staff shortages or unprofessional behavior, including neglect or minimal assistance for residents who need help. The combination of pest issues and inconsistent housekeeping creates a safety and comfort gap that destabilizes daily life for vulnerable residents.

On the positive side, the environment can present as a calm, home-like setting with moments of genuine engagement. Reviewers highlight neat, orderly rooms and a building that is kept up, along with active programs and a sense that residents can participate in family days and church-related activities. Some staff are described as caring and capable, and the location’s quietness can be inviting for families seeking a low-stress atmosphere. These aspects matter because they provide social structure and a veneer of dignity, which can be essential for residents who thrive on routine and personal connections, even when other care elements are imperfect.

However, the stronger negatives tend to overwhelm the positives in practical decision-making. The most alarming reports include bed bugs, residents left with inadequate hygiene, bathrooms not cleaned for extended periods, and a perception that basic supplies are scarce. Instances of disengaged or rude staff, and allegations that dementia care is mishandled, such as residents being restrained or left unattended, strike at safety and trust. The severity and frequency of these concerns make it difficult to rely on this community for long-term stability, especially for families that require consistent monitoring and escalation when problems arise.

Another critical factor is the ambiguity surrounding the facility’s future. A plan to close the doors and relocate the program, with rebuilding anticipated later, introduces real disruption risk. Continuity of care in the event of relocation or temporary closure is a practical consideration that cannot be dismissed, particularly for residents with memory impairment or chronic medical needs. This looming uncertainty compounds questions about staffing consistency, ongoing training, and the ability to maintain individual care plans under shifting management or environment.

In practical terms, prospective residents and families should conduct a thorough, twofold diligence process: first, an in-person, unfiltered tour focused on sanitation, staffing patterns, and daily routines; second, direct questions about pest control history, incident reporting, and the current plan for any upcoming closure or renovation. Speak with the administrator and front-line CNAs, observe how meals are served, and note whether hygiene supplies, handwashing stations, and assistance are readily available. Ask for recent resident outcomes, care plans, and opportunities to meet a resident’s designated caregiver. Only with clear, recent proof of clean conditions, attentive staffing across shifts, and a concrete, stable plan for care continuity should Fremont Rest Center be considered a viable home.

Given the mixed record, families with the goal of minimizing risk should view Fremont Rest Center as a last-resort option, reserved for tight budgets and strong oversight by family members who can frequently monitor conditions. For those who prioritize consistent cleanliness, reliable, well-trained staff, and uninterrupted care, alternatives in the area that demonstrate steadier performance are strongly recommended. If cost constraints are absolute and the patient’s social needs and family involvement can offset care gaps, Fremont may still be contemplated, with explicit guardrails, a clear escalation plan, and continued, rigorous oversight from family or guardians.