Forest Place in Saint Paul, MN

Senior living communities with a similar price nearby

• from +$60 / mo

  RosePointe II

  5 from 24 reviews

  $930 to $1,155 / month

  3.2 miles away
• from +$85 / mo

  Lakewood Hills

  5 from 12 reviews

  $955 to $1,080 / month

  6.0 miles away
• About the same

  The Anthony James

  4.9 from 13 reviews

  $875 to $1,135 / month

  14.0 miles away
• from -$108 / mo

  Oak Crest Retirement Community

  4.9 from 12 reviews

  $762 to $1,019 / month

  10.8 miles away
• from -$140 / mo

  SummerHouse of Bloomington

  4.7 from 11 reviews

  $730 to $4,680 / month

  14.3 miles away

Pros

• The apartment units themselves are nice.
• The units are beautiful, and management is very nice and quick to fix problems.
• Great management.
• The units are nice, clean, up-to-date, and reasonably sized.
• The property offers affordable living and is very quiet.
• The apartment was a gem in the rough when it came to management/maintenance, and Sarah communicates well with residents.

Cons

• They were promised no infestation issues, but roaches and mice appeared, and a ceiling leak was only painted over after a week of maintenance.
• The building is old and poorly maintained, with dirty hallways and third-floor hallways smelling of urine; not worth the rent.
• Parking was horrible, the apartment flooded twice, and maintenance offered little help; the property was consistently trashy and the neighborhood terrible.
• Vehicles parked without a permit are towed for $325.
• Parking accommodations were limited to 12 spaces, with overflow parking shared with a school, leaving tenants with no reserved spots.
• The property has the worst customer service, with long delays to view and appointment cancellations.
• Smoking inside is allowed, which is a deal breaker for some, despite a great location.
• Rent is high and heat/AC costs add to it.

Review

Forest Place in Saint Paul is best suited for independent seniors who need a straightforward, budget-friendly apartment and place a premium on accessible management over modern amenities. The building is older, and while some units can feel comfortable, the community’s strongest draw is a rent level that includes basic utilities for budget-conscious residents. This is not the right fit for those who insist on pristine pest control, flawless upkeep, or a neighborhood with polished, contemporary surroundings. Prospective residents should expect a plain setting where maintenance sometimes lags and where the overall environment reflects decades of wear rather than contemporary design.

Those weighing alternatives should consider options that prioritize proactive pest control, rapid, visible repairs, and a safer, more cohesive neighborhood. If infestation control, consistently prompt fixes, and a modern, quiet living vibe are non-negotiables, Forest Place should not be the final pick. For families or individuals who want on-site care coordination, predictable service levels, or a more stable, professionally managed atmosphere, exploring other senior-appropriate communities will likely yield better long-term satisfaction.

On the positive side, the most credible advantages of Forest Place are the room to room value and the reality that some apartments are nicely appointed for the price. Several reviews laud the units themselves as appealing and up-to-date in comparison to the surrounding area, with management that can be quick to address problems in certain cases. The sense of quiet and a low-key environment also appeal to residents who do not require intense social programming or premium building finishes. When management is responsive, these advantages become meaningful, especially for residents who can tolerate occasional maintenance gaps.

The most consequential drawbacks, however, are hard to ignore. Infestation concerns and recurring water leaks paint a troubling picture of the building’s infrastructure and upkeep. In several accounts, fixes were slow or superficial, water damaged ceilings painted over rather than fully repaired, that underscored a broader maintenance rhythm problem. Hallways can feel dirty or smell like urine on certain floors, and parking is consistently described as insufficient and awkward, with the added risk of towing for unauthorized vehicles. The neighborhood itself is polarizing, and interior policies such as smoking indoors complicate the living experience for sensitive residents. Taken together, these cons can offset the perceived affordability unless a strong personal tolerance for risk and inconvenience is present.

From a practical decision-making standpoint, that trade-off matters. If driving access and parking are non-negotiable, or if a smoke-free, consistently clean interior is essential, Forest Place demands careful scrutiny and likely a comparison with properties that guarantee reserved parking and stricter interior policies. For seniors who prize budget stability and do not mind occasional maintenance quirks, the community can still offer a workable solution, provided expectations are carefully managed and current conditions align with what is actually experienced on a day-to-day basis.

Before committing, families should demand concrete evidence of maintenance reliability and pest control effectiveness. Request current pest-control logs, a clear maintenance-response timeline, and recent work orders to gauge whether core issues have been resolved or merely patched. Tour multiple units to assess odor, cleanliness, and finish quality; inspect hallways and common areas for consistency; verify parking availability, and understand overflow arrangements and any towing rules in practice. Finally, verify how notices and community communications are handled to avoid the kind of last-minute surprises that have frustrated past residents.

In the end, Forest Place offers a financially sensible path for independent seniors who can accept older infrastructure and a variable maintenance track record. It is unlikely to satisfy families seeking a pristine, modernized living environment with predictable service and abundant parking. If safety, spotless upkeep, and a seamless, low-friction living experience are paramount, alternatives, especially communities with on-site staff, structured care offerings, and stronger pest-control commitments, should be prioritized.