3055 Old Highway 8 #202, St. Anthony, MN 55418
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Olympic Group Home
Cons
The place is dirty and smells like mildew.- The fingerprinting staff member was extremely unprofessional, rude, and impatient.
- The staff member manhandled the reviewer and raised his voice multiple times when the thumbprint couldn’t be read.
- The overall experience was absolutely miserable.
- The reviewer believes people come here only for business.
- There was a long wait with no front desk or seating, and the place closes early.
- The person in charge spent 10 minutes playing pool instead of helping, which was very annoying.
- They advise others not to go to IdentoGo.
Review
Olympic Group Home in St. Anthony is best suited for budget-conscious seniors or families seeking a low-cost, no-frills option where affordability is the primary lure and expectations for polish and top-tier administration are intentionally modest. The available impressions center on basic occupancy rather than a curated, care-focused experience. With an overall rating around 3.2 out of 5 from 20 reviews, the sentiment skews toward caution: the environment and front-office operations appear underwhelming, and that combination will matter most to residents who prioritize a comfortable, well-maintained living space and dependable administrative support.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families and residents who value cleanliness, professional demeanor, and streamlined admissions. The fingerprinting process at this location, an ordinary, once-in-a-while step for many families, has drawn repeatedly harsh feedback: reports describe a dirty, mildew-tinged facility, staffers who are unprofessional, rude, or physically overbearing, and a process that devolves into delays and frustration. Long waits, a front-desk and seating void, and a perception of disorganized communications compound the risk that administrative mishaps will spill into day-to-day life. For anyone who cannot tolerate frequent lapses in courtesy or reliability, other facilities are a safer bet.
On balance, the few potential advantages implied by the reviews, primarily affordability and possible convenience of location, do not meaningfully offset the core drawbacks. The smell of mildew and the sense of neglect in common areas set a negative tone that colors every interaction, from tours to daily routines. A front-desk absence and staff distraction translate to inconsistent responsiveness and unclear guidance during admissions and routine questions. When the cost savings are weighed against the probability of recurring friction, the math favors choosing a community with stronger operational discipline and visible maintenance standards.
Practical steps are essential for families still weighing this option. Schedule in-person visits at multiple times to observe consistency in cleanliness and service. Request a candid briefing on who handles admissions and fingerprinting, and see the intake flow firsthand. Inspect common areas for upkeep, ask about housekeeping schedules, and verify whether front-desk coverage is reliable. Talk to residents about daily life, maintenance responsiveness, noise, and staff courtesy. Compare these findings with nearby communities that offer similar price points but have documented commitments to upkeep, professional behavior, and smoother admissions processes. The goal is to avoid a mismatch where price comes at the expense of daily comfort and safety.
This option serves best those who can tolerate a lean, no-frills atmosphere and are prioritizing cost over meticulous environmental and administrative quality. If a family needs a facility with consistently clean surroundings, proactive housekeeping, reliable intake procedures, and staff who communicate with residents and families in a respectful, timely manner, Olympic Group Home should not be the default choice. The review pattern, frequent staff friction, limited front-desk access, and environmental concerns, signals that there is significant risk in assuming this setting will meet expectations for a dependable, reassuring daily experience. Safer bets exist for those seeking a steadier routine and greater confidence in day-to-day operations.
Bottom line: this community represents a high-risk pick for households that place a premium on cleanliness, reliable admissions processing, and consistently respectful, attentive staff. If budget constraints are absolute, proceed with a conservative risk assessment and actively compare with better-reviewed options. Demand clarity on upkeep plans, front-desk staffing, and a predictable admissions workflow before committing. When moving forward, prioritize visits that verify housekeeping frequency, maintenance response times, and staff training. In most cases, alternatives with stronger management oversight will deliver cleaner environments, smoother operations, and a more reassuring daily life for residents and their families.
21 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Minneapolis-St Paul International (10 miles away)
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Comprehensive care with 24/7 supervision, medication management, and engaging activities in a fully furnished setting.
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.
An Extensive Exploration of the VA Aid and Attendance Benefit
Senior Transition Services: Understanding Their Role, Cost, and Importance