209 1st Street SE, Little Falls, MN 56345
To contact a resident: (320) 632-3387
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Buckman Apartments Costs & Pricing
Buckman Apartments offers a competitively priced 1-bedroom unit at $625 per month, which stands in stark contrast to the average living costs in Morrison County and across the state of Minnesota. In comparison, residents of Morrison County typically face monthly expenses that soar to approximately $3,268, while the state average hovers around $2,893. This significant disparity highlights Buckman Apartments as an exceptionally affordable option for individuals seeking comfortable living arrangements without straining their budgets, making it an appealing choice amid the higher costs prevalent in the wider region.
| Floor plans | Buckman Apartments | Morrison County | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $625 | $3,268 | $2,893 |
Overall Review of Buckman Apartments
Cons
The reviewer doesn't know about the apartments.- The reviewer had to request applications three times to be mailed.
- The reviewer drove 90 miles to obtain an application from the office.
- The reviewer scheduled an appointment to see a vacancy, but no one was in the office at or after the appointment time.
- The reviewer believes the management there needs to be replaced.
Review
Buckman Apartments in Little Falls, MN, is best suited for independent seniors who want the most straightforward, affordable housing option without built-in care services. The community appears to deliver basic rental living, private apartments, likely with standard maintenance, without the commitments of a full-service senior residence. For residents who prize privacy and independence and are comfortable navigating a lean administrative environment, Buckman can be a workable choice. However, the facts at hand come from a tiny sample: two reviews, one strongly negative and the other neutral-to-positive, signaling that the experience can swing widely depending on staff behavior and day-to-day operations. Prospective renters should enter with eyes wide open about the potential for administrative friction.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are seniors who require predictable access to staff, consistent application processes, or on-site coordination for errands, meals, or daily activities. Families seeking a sense of warm, proactive management, someone to handle inquiries promptly, schedule tours cleanly, and respond to maintenance requests quickly, will likely be disappointed here. In the absence of comprehensive on-site services, Buckman becomes less attractive for residents who value reliability in intake, scheduling, and ongoing resident support. For such individuals, nearby independent living communities with more robust office presence or assisted living options should be evaluated.
The main con highlighted by the negative review centers on administration and access. A resident reportedly requested applications three times by mail and ultimately drove 90 miles to obtain one in person, only to encounter an empty office at the scheduled appointment. That kind of service gap is not a minor inconvenience; it signals a deficiency in basic care for prospective residents. The implication is clear: potential renters may endure delays, miscommunication, and a brittle process that undermines trust from the first contact. When intake is this unreliable, even favorable lease terms or minimal monthly costs cannot fully offset the risk of ongoing administrative chaos.
On the upside, a separate review rated the property four stars, indicating that there are residents who found value and reasons to stay beyond the first impression of disorganization. While the specifics aren’t laid out, that signal matters: Buckman Apartments can provide a satisfactory living environment for some, likely where the physical unit meets expectations and the resident is self-sufficient. The 2.5 overall rating, split between a strong negative and a relatively favorable one, points to a volatile service environment. The key takeaway is that the setting may work for certain individuals who can tolerate the gaps in management and communication, but it will not be universally reliable.
Before deciding, verify a few practical details that separate a potential fit from a misstep. Confirm whether applications can be processed electronically and in a timely fashion, and demand written timelines or confirmations. Request a current contact person and clear office hours, and insist on a tour with someone who can introduce each amenity and outline maintenance response times. Inquire about any on-site staff coverage, as well as policies on emergency calls, rent increases, and move-in procedures. Gather contact information for current residents to gauge consistency of service, and consider a contingency plan if the office remains intermittently available.
In the end, Buckman Apartments should be approached as a conditional fit: a potential option for those prioritizing affordability and independence who can tolerate a hands-off management approach and a sometimes rocky intake process. For anyone who expects consistent governance, proactive communication, and built-in assurances for daily support, several alternatives in the Little Falls area offer a more reliable path. The decision should rest on a clear assessment of whether independence weighs more than reliability, and whether the price point justifies the risk of ongoing administrative uncertainty. In practical terms, the right choice hinges on the resident’s tolerance for friction and the family’s willingness to advocate for needed services.
Active Adult Communities (55+)
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities on-site
Beautician on-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
24-hour supervision with medication management and engaging activities.
Is a Geriatric Care Manager the Right Choice for Your Family?
Compassionate Conversations: How to Comfort Someone Who Is Grieving
Home Health Care Aides: Understanding Their Role and Supporting Your Family