12168 Lake Road, Montrose, MI 48457
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Herrington House
Pros
The reviewer loves Harrington Classic Homes.
Cons
The builder is described as one of the worst in Wilmington, with no work ethic, professionalism, or good communication.- They are accused of being a scam and of treating customers poorly.
- They deliver poor quality work and install low-quality materials.
- They charge high prices while using low-grade materials.
- They allegedly try to prevent buyers from inspecting the home during construction to hide defects.
- They charged a neighbor $18,000 at closing and blamed COVID for it.
- They are labeled as greedy, reckless, disrespectful, inconsiderate, and careless.
- They are said to have left the community on the brink of bankruptcy due to a lack of respect for humanity.
Review
Herrington House in Montrose, MI appears best suited for families seeking a small, home-like assisted living experience where caregivers deliver personal, relationship-centered care. The limited but telling feedback centers on a “group home” vibe and warmth, with phrases that convey residents may be treated more like family than as anonymous clients. In practical terms, this setting can be a strong fit for those who value everyday familiarity, close caregiver attention, and a less institutional atmosphere over high-tech programming or a polished corporate footprint. The core appeal is relational care delivered in a modest, perhaps less formal environment.
However, the reviews also urge a sober inspection of administrative clarity and trust. Alternative choices should be strongly considered by families that prioritize transparent governance, consistent communication, and predictable, straightforward billing. The negative threads in the feedback emphasize concerns about professionalism, communication gaps, and pricing practices. While these remarks reference experiences with a different operator, they highlight risks that routinely surface when billing, contracts, and day-to-day communications are not disciplined. In short, if a family cannot verify clear policies and reliable contact, the choice warrants caution.
On the upside, the strongest positive signal is the perceived warmth and the group-home format. A review explicitly labels the facility as a “group home,” and another expresses strong affection for the staff, with a simple, confident note of appreciation. Those elements, familiar routines, accessible staff, and a sense of being cared for in a homey setting, can translate into meaningful daily comfort and meaningful social connections for residents who thrive in intimate, less institutional surroundings. When staffing is stable and staff-resident relationships are consistently positive, this can offset some ancillary gaps in programming or amenities common to smaller operations.
The accompanying cautions counterbalance that warmth. The main cautions concern administrative reliability: inconsistent or opaque communication, questions about professionalism, and concerns about the financial side of care. In practice, families evaluating Herrington House should be prepared for the possibility that what feels like attentive, personal service on a given day could be undermined by miscommunication or hidden charges. These risks matter because they drive overall satisfaction, long-term cost certainty, and the ability to plan for emerging care needs. Without transparent processes, even strong caregiver relationships can be strained by avoidable friction.
A practical due-diligence plan is essential before deciding. Prospective residents and families should request a clear, written services contract that details what is included in base fees and what constitutes add-ons. Ask for a current sample bill and verify how often charges change and by how much. Insist on a candid conversation with the administrator about communication channels, response times, and what happens when concerns arise. Visit with both the activities program and the care team to observe consistency in staffing and responsiveness. Speak with several current residents and families to gauge whether the home-like feel remains reliable day-to-day, not just on a tour day.
In the verdict, Herrington House offers a tangible home-like environment that can suit residents who prize intimate, relational care and a non-institutional setting. But the decision hinges on administrative transparency and dependable communication. If transparency, predictable pricing, and steady governance are non-negotiables, families should cast a wide net and compare larger, more structured options that demonstrate rigorous contract clarity and consistent family communication. If warmth, a group-home rhythm, and close caregiver relationships align with what matters most, and due diligence confirms reliable administration, Herrington House could be the right fit. Otherwise, pursue alternatives with a track record of clear policies, consistent staffing, and unambiguous billing practices.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Bishop (19 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained