Elizabeth Lee Doles Manor in Clinton Township, MI

Senior living communities with a similar price nearby

• from -$31 / mo

  Loving Care Home #1

  5 from 18 reviews

  $850 to $1,000 / month

  20.5 miles away
• from -$81 / mo

  Affectionate Care 1

  5 from 15 reviews

  $800 / month

  10.2 miles away
• from -$31 / mo

  Loving Care Home #3

  5 from 13 reviews

  $850 to $1,000 / month

  20.5 miles away
• About the same

  King Special Care

  5 from 10 reviews

  $900 to $2,500 / month

  18.8 miles away
• from -$117 / mo

  The Meadows of Anchor Bay

  4.8 from 18 reviews

  $764 to $926 / month

  7.4 miles away

Pros

• The staff is extremely helpful and goes above and beyond their duties.
• The manager always has time to listen to residents.
• The service coordinator has helped residents with federal and state benefits.
• The owners have sponsored trips for the last four years.
• The ladies who run the place have a heart of gold.
• They provide housing for residents and assist with paperwork.
• There is an in-house laundromat and a bus that takes residents to Meijer for shopping.
• The facility is pretty clean.

Cons

• The facility is described as a complete dump.
• It reportedly has bedbugs in the thousands.
• There is no place to put a loved one or friends.
• They spray one room every Tuesday.
• It has no shopping and no posted hours.
• It is not within walking distance to anything.
• The community room is very small with little socialization.

Review

Elizabeth Lee Doles Manor in Clinton Township is best suited for independent seniors who want a straightforward, budget-conscious housing option with hands-on administrative support and practical on-site conveniences. The community rewards residents who value personal attention from a responsive management team and who can make use of in-house services like a laundromat and scheduled transportation. For families seeking a place where staff actively assist with benefits paperwork, manage day-to-day needs, and help residents navigate the process of securing entitlements, this option delivers reliable, approachable help and a sense of continuity, especially for those who are comfortable downsizing and living in a modest, no-frills setting.

That practicality, however, comes with clear trade-offs. Alternatives should be considered for anyone who prioritizes robust social programming, frequent shopping access, or a location that feels safer or more walkable. Several reviews flag a lack of nearby amenities and social outlets, plus the reality of a neighborhood environment that reviewers describe as far from ideal for easy outings. For families or residents who expect a larger community room, more frequent activities, or ready access to stores and venues within a short stroll, other options may deliver a more satisfying day-to-day rhythm.

The strongest positives are the people running the place. Multiple accounts highlight staff who are friendly, genuinely helpful, and willing to go beyond the call of duty. A manager who listens, a service coordinator who helps with federal and state benefits, and a resident council that pushes for enhanced programming all contribute to a sense of stability and ongoing support. In-house amenities like a laundromat and transportation to Meijer, plus occasional sponsored trips, create practical advantages that keep routine life manageable. Cleanliness and a generally well-run operation are cited by residents as reasons to stay, reinforcing the value of dependable, hands-on management.

Yet the main drawbacks are substantial and hard to ignore. A single, troubling review describes bedbugs that required intervention and raised concerns about ongoing pest control, an issue that understandably undermines confidence in the safety and comfort of a home for seniors. Other reviews point to a lack of shopping within the community, limited hours, and a small social space that can dampen opportunities for meaningful interaction. The campus atmosphere, described by one observer as home to many Social Security recipients with mental health issues, raises considerations about suitability for an elderly resident who needs predictability and easy access to social engagement outside a small community room. Several writers also flag the area as not being within easy walking distance of everyday amenities, which can impact independence for those who prefer or require frequent outings.

Those pros and cons don’t balance equally for every family. For a resident who values a steady caregiving ethos, administrative help, and practical conveniences, the staff-driven support and tangible services can offset the downsides of a smaller social footprint and a modest location. The ability to rely on a manager who will listen, and on a benefits coordinator who handles complex paperwork, reduces stress for families navigating transitions. However, for seniors who crave frequent activities, nearby shopping, a safer or more vibrant neighborhood, or a larger, more active community life, this option likely won’t satisfy those expectations. The bedbug concern, if current or recurring, remains a red flag that can tip the balance toward exploring other communities with stronger pest-control histories and clearer safety metrics.

In short, Elizabeth Lee Doles Manor works best for independent seniors who prize attentive staff, practical on-site amenities, and targeted administrative support, while accepting a quieter social scene and a location that isn’t rich with shopping or high-traffic venues. Families weighing alternatives should prioritize those with stronger social programming, closer access to shops, and a pest-control track record that eliminates the worry of infestations. A thoughtful visit is essential: ask about pest history and remediation plans, tour the activity calendar and the size of the communal space, verify transportation schedules, and probe neighborhood safety and walkability. This careful shopping can determine whether the strengths of this community align with the resident’s needs, or whether another option better preserves independence, safety, and social fulfillment.