Lakeland Wesley Village

Pros

• The reviewer says the residents were very nice to them when they lived there.

Cons

• The property looked very run-down and unkept.
• There were security concerns, including an incident where someone left the apartment with a key, suggesting inadequate security and a need for cameras.
• There were claims that hackers live on the property, and that employees have keys to every unit and enter apartments while tenants are out.
• Tenants were advised to hide medications and count pills because hackers could disable Wi-Fi cameras to rummage through personal property.
• A tenant was evicted over what were described as bogus write-ups, with management labeled as cold, cruel, and heartless.
• Overall, the management and operation were viewed as mismanaged or untrustworthy.

Review

The accounts describe a place that, on first impression, looks rundown and unkept. One reviewer notes that the exterior and overall condition give a sense of neglect, a backdrop that seems at odds with the human warmth they encountered from the people living there. Despite the faded facades and tired appearance, it's clear that at least some residents found the community to be filled with genuinely nice people who treated them well while they were living there. The contrast between the outward state of the property and the inward kindness of the tenants creates a complicated picture: a place that feels neglected in its upkeep but not entirely devoid of friendly, supportive residents.

There's a sense of curiosity about the location and its natural surroundings. The reviewer asks if the area is only about a block from Kentucky Lake, and whether there's a park with a pier on the lake nearby. The questions imply a curiosity about easy access to outdoor recreation, waterfront views, and the potential for fishing or boating adventures that could sweeten the overall living experience. The mention of nearby nature - fishing, deer, perhaps other wildlife - suggests that some residents might value an address that offers more than amenities inside the building, hoping for a connection to the surrounding environment.

When it comes to the financial and logistical details of living there, there are several practical questions. The reviewer asks whether heat, air, electric, water, trash, and other utilities are included in the rent, and whether the rent itself counts as affordable housing. They also wonder if moving there would allow them to keep more of their paycheck, which points to concerns about cost of living and monthly expenses. The possibility of bringing a dog or other pets is another recurring theme, indicating that pet policy and the flexibility of living with animals are important considerations. Overall, the tone conveys a desire to understand the true monthly cost of living and whether the property represents a viable budget option.

Socially, the place seems to have moments of warmth and a sense of community. The reviewer notes that there are many friendly people among the residents and suggests that the environment could feel welcoming if you're part of the right circles. The questions about wildlife - fish in the nearby lake and deer in the surrounding area - imply a setting that could be appealing to nature lovers. All of this hints at a potential for positive interpersonal experiences and a neighborhood atmosphere that, for some, would offset other drawbacks.

Beyond the surface impressions and the practical questions, there are serious complaints about security and privacy. The reviewer recounts a specific incident around the 4th of July: someone was caught on a security camera leaving the apartment, and the person responsible would have needed a key. The insistence that more security cameras are needed to prevent such intrusions underscores a fear of unauthorized access and a desire for stronger monitoring to protect residents' safety and property. This incident is framed as evidence of ongoing vulnerability and a call for heightened perimeter and unit-level surveillance to deter would-be trespassers.

The narrative then veers into more extreme accusations, claiming that there are hackers living in the complex and that authorities or management aren't doing enough to address the problem. The writer asserts that the employees have keys to every apartment and will enter units when tenants are out running errands or at work. There is a stark warning to residents to beware and hide medications, counting pills carefully, because hackers allegedly tamper with Wi-Fi cameras, turning them off so a few employees can rummage through personal property. These claims paint a picture of a security lapse so severe that personal safety and privacy could feel compromised on a daily basis, turning what might be a routine rental experience into a source of constant vigilance and fear.

A later section of the account shifts to a more personal and family-centered grievance. The reviewer describes the eviction of a tenant who relies on a heart machine, labeling the action as bogus and accusing the management as cold, cruel, and heartless. The emotional weight of this complaint is palpable: it's not just about a policy decision, but about how it affected a vulnerable resident's health and well-being. The speaker recalls being inside the apartments themselves, watching the property advertise itself through a commercial, and feeling that the overall operation is far from trustworthy. The closing sentiment suggests a belief that the broader government oversight or oversight of the property's management is insufficient or ineffective, reinforcing a strong sense of disappointment and frustration with how the place is run.

Taken together, the collection of observations presents a nuanced but troubling portrait. On the one hand, there are mentions of friendly neighbors, a potentially appealing location, and possibilities for outdoor recreation that could make the place feel homey for the right person. On the other hand, there are persistent fears about security and privacy, claims of unauthorized entry by staff, and allegations of hacking that would escalate worry about personal property and medication safety. The recurrent theme across these paragraphs is a tension between a may-be supportive community and a series of serious, unaddressed concerns about safety, privacy, and the integrity of management practices. For anyone considering living there, these perspectives emphasize the importance of weighing the visible, everyday aspects of the property against the deeper trust and security required to feel truly at home.

Restaurants

• Eddie's Place (2.1 miles)
• Belew's Dairy Bar (4 miles)
• Cajun Sno-Balls (4.4 miles)
• Brass Lantern Restaurant (4.7 miles)
• Willow Pond Southern Catfish (4.9 miles)
• Ralph's Harborview Grill (6.9 miles)
• Panda Chinese Buffet (8.2 miles)

Places of Worship

• Fairdealing Church Of Christ (2.5 miles)
• Olive Missionary Baptist Church (3 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (3.1 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (4.6 miles)
• Hardin Baptist Church (6.1 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (8.1 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (8.2 miles)

Parks

• Benton City Park (7.8 miles)
• Mike Miller Park (10.9 miles)
• Prizer Point Public Use Area (14 miles)
• City of Murray Park (14.8 miles)
• Twin Lakes Backcountry Area (14.9 miles)

Hospitals

• Marshall County Hospital (7.8 miles)

Pharmacies

• Good Neighbor Pharmacy (7.8 miles)
• J & R Pharmacy (8.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (8.2 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (8.9 miles)
• Draffenville Pharmacy (10.1 miles)
• Kroger Pharmacy (14.6 miles)
• Quest Pharmaceutical (14.8 miles)

Physicians

• Personal Medicine Of Kentucky natalie hodge md (7.9 miles)
• Personal Medicine of Kentucky (7.9 miles)
• Eye Care Associates of Kentucky (8.4 miles)
• Albertson Family Medical Do (8.6 miles)
• Miracle-Ear Hearing Aid Center (8.9 miles)
• Forte Family Practice (9.2 miles)
• Marshall County Surgical Medical Group (9.3 miles)

Cafes

• Embers Restaurant (12.1 miles)
• Pokey s Cafe and Bait Shop (12.5 miles)
• Panera Bread (14.8 miles)

Transportation

• Enterprise Rent-A-Car (13.8 miles)