2720 W Tayjan Lane, Post Falls, ID 83854
To contact a resident: (208) 457-7016
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Silver Creek I and II
Pros
Their experiences have been mostly favorable.- They like this building better.
- They love their apartment a lot.
- They feel very fortunate to live in this complex.
- The manager Haley and the maintenance staff are awesome and truly care.
- They have been there for seven months with no complaints.
- They are living the American Dream.
Cons
The complex is disgusting with dogs defecating in the building and drunks throwing up in the building.- The building has not been cleaned for over six months.
- The management company doesn't care how tenants are treated, only that they keep them full.
- The manager is a liar and the assistant manager is immature and inexperienced; neither should be working as a manager.
- Drug addicts, drunks, people that steal, and corruption are what this place is about.
- The apartments are a bit small and parking is awful.
- There are significant maintenance and safety issues: air leaks around windows/doors, poor insulation, pipes/bursting and flooding, with carpets/walls not repaired.
- The complex seems to avoid tenants who need caregivers.
- Parking is unassigned and can cause arguments.
Review
Silver Creek I and II in Post Falls, Idaho are best suited for financially independent seniors who want generous apartment layouts, a resident-driven social scene, and an on-site living environment that feels like a small, active community. The evaluate-to-commit decision here hinges on weighing spacious interiors and accessible features against uneven maintenance, variable management performance, and some safety/cleanliness concerns. Those who need reliable, hands-on management or consistent, pristine upkeep may want to consider other options.
Pros that repeatedly surface in reviews include a responsive, caring maintenance team and managers who genuinely interact with residents. Several long-tenured residents speak highly of Haley and the upkeep crew, noting they are helpful and that staff truly seem to care. The apartments themselves offer big bedrooms, abundant closet space, and practical layouts, features that reduce clutter and make independent living more comfortable. An elevator and the general layout of the campus also support mobility and ease of use for residents who are managing stairs or stair-climbing challenges.
Yet the positive attributes are tempered by notable downsides. A recurrent theme is inconsistent cleanliness and upkeep, including reports of dog mess in common areas, lingering odors, and a building that, at times, has felt neglected for extended periods. Management accountability is questioned in several reviews, with harsh language directed at leadership and accusations that the priority is occupancy over resident welfare. Physical problems like air leaks around windows and doors, insulation gaps, and sporadic maintenance staffing contribute to a sense that the community is aging in place without a reliable, proactive refresh strategy.
These tensions between strong personal care and patchy maintenance create a mixed balance of risk and reward. On the one hand, residents who value camaraderie and a sense of belonging can tolerate a few nuisances because the social fabric remains vibrant: people seem approachable, and long-standing tenants report having formed real connections. On the other hand, issues such as unassigned parking, limited proximity to public transit, and reports of cliques among tenants can intensify friction for those who rely on predictable logistics or who require more structured social environments. The presence of an elevator and roomy units helps mitigate some mobility and space concerns, but it does not fully offset experiences of instability or perceived neglect within the building.
Who should consider alternatives? Prospective residents with high sensitivity to cleanliness standards or who depend on consistently proactive management will want to compare other Post Falls options. Families seeking robust enforcement of rules, transparent financials, and obvious caretaking protocols may find Silver Creekâs current mix of praise and critique insufficient. Additionally, those who require easy transit access or tightly managed parking arrangements will want to weigh other communities that place greater emphasis on bus routes, assigned parking, and on-site services designed to support daily living with caregiver needs.
In sum, Silver Creek I and II offer generous spaces, a personable on-site team, and a peer-supported living experience that can feel genuinely home-like for the right resident. The decision hinges on tolerance for uneven upkeep and management responsiveness. Before committing, prospective residents should tour both buildings, speak with several residents across different floors, and specifically verify maintenance response times, cleanliness standards, and parking arrangements. If the priority is spacious apartments and an engaged peer group, and the potential maintenance quirks are acceptable, this campus can be a steady, livable option. If those quirks feel like deal-breakers, pursuing alternatives with stronger daily operations and more predictable upkeep will be the prudent course.
Active Adult Communities (55+)
Activities on-site
Air-conditioning
Bath tubs
Full kitchen
Ground floor units
Handicap accessible
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Wheelchair accessible showers
Resident band or musicians
Seniors and Modern Transportation: Exploring Uber, Lyft, and Other Ride-Hailing Options
Comprehensive Guide to Qualifying for Home Health Care Services
Powerful Realities of Elder Abuse and the Most Effective Ways to Report It
