1300 Rock Chapel Road, Lithonia, GA 30058
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Ageless Personal Care Costs & Pricing
Ageless Personal Care offers competitive pricing for its services compared to both Rockdale County and the broader state of Georgia. For a semi-private room, residents benefit from an affordable rate of $1,500 per month, which is significantly lower than the county's average of $1,926 and the state's average of $2,529. Similarly, in terms of private accommodations, Ageless Personal Care presents a compelling option at $2,500 per month, outpacing Rockdale County's average cost of $2,363 and Georgia's state average of $2,864. These pricing structures not only reflect Ageless Personal Care's commitment to providing quality care but also underscore its role as an accessible choice for families seeking personalized support within their budgetary considerations.
| Floor plans | Ageless Personal Care | Rockdale County | Georgia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,500 | $1,926 | $2,529 |
| Private | $2,500 | $2,363 | $2,864 |
Overall Review of Ageless Personal Care
Cons
The place is described as horrible and the services are terrible.
The house manager is described as an idiot.
The reviews warn not to send loved ones there.
The home is old, dusty, and smells like urine.
The food is nasty.
The home has roaches and ants.
Seniors describe the personal care home manager as a criminal.
Review
This community is best viewed as a last-resort option for families with extremely tight budgets who are willing to accept significant quality and safety concerns in exchange for lower costs. The current feedback paints a bleak picture: a facility described as old and dusty, with environmental and operational problems that undermine basic comfort and dignity. If cost is the sole driver and any compromise on cleanliness, reliable meals, and respectful, competent management is tolerable, this option might be considered; otherwise, it strongly suggests looking elsewhere.
Caregivers and decision-makers who prioritize dependable cleanliness, safe surroundings, and trustworthy leadership should absolutely consider alternatives. The reviews raise red flags about pests, odors, and overall hygienic conditions, alongside serious questions about who is managing the home. Claims of criminal behavior by a staff member and overall poor service markedly diminish the likelihood of a positive experience for a loved one. In short, families seeking consistent quality and transparent operations will find more reliable options in the same region.
Pros are not evident in the available evaluations, and even the isolated 5-star rating cannot offset the weight of the negative reports. A single high rating amid two strongly negative ones signals an unstable overall experience rather than a positive trend. In practical terms, there is no clear, verifiable upside described by residents or reviewers that would compensate for the significant deficits in care, environment, and governance. This discrepancy reinforces the recommendation to scrutinize other community choices more closely.
The most telling drawbacks center on cleanliness, safety, and daily life quality. Reviewers describe urine odors, old and dusty surroundings, and pervasive pest issues like roaches and ants. Food quality is reportedly poor, and services fail to meet basic expectations of a safe, supportive living environment. The combination of a poorly maintained physical plant, subpar meals, and questionable management poses real risks to resident well-being. When these factors cluster, they eclipse any potential convenience or price advantage and create an ongoing stressor for families and residents alike.
To make an informed decision, prospective families should take concrete steps before committing. Schedule a thorough on-site tour, paying close attention to sanitation practices, kitchen cleanliness, and the condition of bathrooms and living spaces. Speak directly with the house manager and frontline staff about response times, care routines, and what happens when issues arise. Request to speak with current residents or families with recent experience, and verify licensing and complaint history with the state. Compare these findings against higher-rated facilities in the area to determine whether meaningful improvements in environment, care, and leadership justify the move.
In sum, Ageless Personal Care in Lithonia presents a profile that is generally unfavorable for most seniors and families prioritizing reliable care and a clean, respectful home. While budget considerations matter, the documented concerns about odors, pests, meals, and management quality make this facility a poor risk for first-time movers and a poor fit for ongoing care needs. Alternatives that demonstrate consistent cleanliness, strong staff responsiveness, and transparent, professional leadership should be prioritized, with this community reserved only for those cases where no viable option exists and due diligence is performed with heightened scrutiny.









Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration