862 Split Rock Lane, Douglasville, GA 30134
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Mount Sinai Home Care
Cons
The owner is accused of not taking good care of the residents.- The owner allegedly leaves residents outside for hours while they attend an adult daycare and won't provide them keys, endangering a resident on oxygen.
- A neighbor had to break down the door to access a resident's oxygen, indicating neglectful management.
- The reviewer believes the place should be shut down.
- The owner allegedly takes only about $30 a month from residents' SSI while charging everyone $700 a month.
- Bedrooms have padlocks on the doors to lock residents in, preventing them from using bathrooms or showers.
- A resident is described as trespassing through neighbors' yards, raising safety concerns.
Review
Mount Sinai Home Care in Douglasville, GA is not a fit for families that expect safety, dignity, and reliable oversight. This community is best considered only by those facing extreme budget constraints who are prepared to accept substantial safety and rights risks as part of a last-resort option. For seniors who require consistent supervision, medical support, or predictable daily routines, better alternatives exist and should be pursued first. When families must choose between scant options, this site will look like a cost saver only on the surface, but the tradeoffs are severe enough to negate any savings.
Those weighing alternatives should prioritize licensed care settings with documented inspections, transparent staffing, and clear resident rights protections. If the primary goal is dependable medical support (including oxygen) and timely assistance, insist on on-site, trained staff with verified coverage. Demand access controls that are safe and predictable, emergency response protocols, and a living environment that respects privacy and autonomy. Any option lacking regulatory oversight, routine staff availability, and written care plans deserves immediate scrutiny and should be crossed off the list in favor of facilities with verifiable credibility.
In practice, the neighborhood setting can feel reassuringly homelike, which can help with visitations and familiarity. Yet the potential advantages quickly dissolve when safety, privacy, and day-to-day care are compromised. The reviews provide no credible, verifiable benefits that counterbalance the severe concerns raised. The impression of a quiet street or lower cost cannot compensate for reports of neglect, inconsistent access to residents, and a lack of basic protections that would be unacceptable in any licensed senior care environment.
The most troubling themes are safety and rights violations dressed as affordability. Allegations describe an owner who may not supervise residents adequately, with residents left outside for extended periods. Reports claim residents cannot obtain a key or adequate access to essential needs, including oxygen equipment, and an incident where a neighbor intervened to secure oxygen. The presence of padlocks on bedroom doors, multiple residents sharing rooms, and limited personal privacy point to an environment where autonomy and dignity are seriously compromised. Combined with questionable billing and room-sharing dynamics, these factors create a pattern that strongly argues for regulatory review and serious caution.
Given these red flags, the pros do not offset the cons; the perceived affordability and residential setting do not justify the risk to safety and rights. There is essentially no documented upside that can counterbalance the dominant concerns. For families evaluating options, this facility should be deprioritized in favor of licensed, well-staffed communities with clear policies, transparent billing practices, and reliable emergency procedures. When evaluating alternatives, verify licenses with the Georgia Department of Community Health, request a formal care plan and staffing ratios, and arrange in-person visits to observe how care and emergencies are actually handled. If this option remains on the table, treat it as a last-resort possibility, contingent on rigorous contract terms, ongoing oversight, and a robust risk assessment.
5 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
William B Hartsfield-Atlanta International (19 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Intimate assisted living with 24-hour supervision, activities, and coordinated care.
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained