4415 West Jean Street, Tampa, FL 33614
To contact a resident: (813) 453-2480
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Yudith's Assisted Living Facility II
Pros
The facility has an excellent team that provides excellent care to residents.
Their notes are in excellent condition, administration is fully attentive, and the relationship between residents and staff is exceptional.
The facility is highly recommended.
The staff are caring and the facility offers a wide range of services.
The facility smells pleasant and the food looks appealing.
The menus are better than many school menus.
Residents are happy, and that brings joy to families.
Cons
The female owner doesn't care about much but the profits.
The food is mostly canned and boxed.
Rats and cockroaches are in the walls and rooms, everywhere.
The facility is constantly short-staffed (skeleton crew) and makes no allowances for food allergies or special diets; food is edible at best.
Housekeeping is horrible.
There are no non-emergency staff; only med techs are present.
The staff are rude, frustrated, and unprofessional; the place is dirty and not up to code.
The owners should be ashamed of the facility's deplorable condition.
The facility should be knocked down and rebuilt (extremely negative assessment).
The staff allegedly pass out narcotics to patients like candy, endangering residents.
Review
This community is best suited for families that want an accessible, caregiver-focused environment where administration is reachable and staff-resident relationships are prioritized, and where families are prepared to supervise daily operations closely. It may work for residents who require routine companionship and basic daily living support rather than intensive medical management, and for whom the primary concern is interpersonal care over pristine facilities or flawless operations. In short, strong advocacy and hands-on involvement from families are essential to make this choice workable.
On the positive side, several reports highlight a capable core team and attentive administration, with notes kept in good order and a sense that residents are known by name. Some reviewers praise staff dedication, glimpses of pride from individuals like Gloria, and point to a generally friendly atmosphere and groups that provide social engagement. When conditions align with expectations, these elements can create moments of reassurance: communicative staff, visible care interactions, and a sense that someone is keeping an eye on residentsâ day-to-day needs.
Yet the drawbacks are substantial and systemic enough to temper any optimism. The most persistent red flags are cleanliness and pest concerns, with multiple accounts describing dirty conditions, pests in rooms and walls, and a pervasive impression that basic hygiene is not reliably maintained. Staffing challenges are repeatedly cited: a âskeleton crewâ with limited non-emergency assistance, and a seeming gap between talk of individualized care and what actually gets done on weekends or after hours. Dietary accommodations appear inconsistent or unavailable, with strict rules around allergies and special diets not being honored in practice.
Medication handling emerges as a particularly troubling theme. Reported restrictions on residentsâ access to their own medicines, coupled with allegations that controlled substances were misused or inappropriately distributed, point to a risk that cannot be dismissed. When safety protocols around pharmaceuticals feel compromised, the overall confidence in daily operations erodes, especially for families managing chronic conditions, diabetes, or other dietary and medication needs. Taken together with housekeeping and sanitation concerns, these signals strongly suggest that medical and safety oversight may not be reliable enough without constant family advocacy.
Given these dynamics, alternatives should be seriously considered for anyone prioritizing consistent cleanliness, robust dietary accommodations, transparent communication, and dependable med-management. Families should look for facilities with demonstrable pest control, verifiable sanitation practices, and stated policies that empower residents with their medications and personal routines. If a community cannot provide steady staffing levels, clear pathways for reporting issues, and proactive problem resolution, another option is warranted, especially for residents with complex medical needs or strict dietary requirements.
Practical next steps are essential. Visit unannounced, ask to review the most recent health inspections and any internal quality-control reports, and request to speak with multiple current residents about daily life. Inquire specifically about meal plans and dietary accommodations, housekeeping schedules, and how medications are stored and administered. Verify the ownerâs contactability, clarity of policy on narcotics and controlled substances, and the facilityâs pest-control and sanitation routines. If these senior markers of quality, cleanliness, safety, reliable medication handling, and transparent communication, cannot be confirmed, lean toward alternatives with stronger, demonstrable track records. The aim is to protect reliability and safety for a loved one, not merely to secure a caretakerâs attentiveness in the moment.





Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained