201 Rosefield Avenue, Leesburg, FL 34748
To contact a resident: (352) 728-1559
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Shady Lane Retirement Home Costs & Pricing
Shady Lane Retirement Home offers competitive pricing for its residents compared to the broader market in Lake County and the state of Florida. For those opting for semi-private accommodations, the monthly cost at Shady Lane is $3,400, which is slightly higher than the county average of $3,119 and the state average of $3,009. In contrast, its private rooms are priced at $4,800 per month; this is above both the Lake County average of $4,081 and significantly higher than Florida's average of $3,699. While Shady Lane may present a premium over local and state averages, many families may find that its services and amenities justify this investment in quality care and comfort for their loved ones.
| Floor plans | Shady Lane Retirement Home | Lake County | Florida |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,400 | $3,119 | $3,009 |
| Private | $4,800 | $4,081 | $3,699 |
Overall Review of Shady Lane Retirement Home
Pros
Shady Lane Retirement Home is nice, well-kept, and clean.
The administrator and the caretaker are very nice, and visitors feel comfortable with them.
The grounds and landscaping are nicely done.
The owner, T.J., is a very caring person and is patient with the residents.
The staff are very helpful to everyone and make them feel at home.
They are eager to provide help to those with special needs.
It is described as the best place that offers great retirement services.
Cons
Her mother has dementia, so she cannot go there.
The rooms were small and looked like somebody's house.
Review
Shady Lane Retirement Home in Leesburg, FL is best suited for seniors who want a small, home-like atmosphere with attentive, hands-on staff and light assistance. It works well for individuals who can live in a two-bed room with their own bathroom and who value a intimate setting over sleek, modern amenities. The facility is not appropriate for residents who require memory care or significant medical oversight, such as someone with dementia, where specialized programming and secure environments are essential.
Families considering alternatives should note that this community may not meet expectations for those needing dementia support or private, spa-like accommodations. The strongest caveat is the dementia gap: one reviewer explicitly found the home unsuitable for a loved one with memory issues. Prospective buyers should compare with facilities offering dedicated memory care units, more private spaces, and larger, more modern layouts. Those seeking a facility with extensive on-site clinical services or highly structured daily programming may prefer a place built around higher-level supervision and cognitive care.
The most compelling advantages here center on warmth and reliability. The staff is described as genuinely helpful and capable of making residents feel at home, with particular praise for the owner, TJ, who is perceived as caring and patient. Administrators and caretakers are viewed as approachable, respectful, and responsive to individual needs, including those with special requirements. The environment is kept clean and well-maintained, and landscaping contributes to a pleasant, welcoming exterior. This combination of personal attention and a calm, tidy setting offers a practical alternative for families prioritizing peace of mind and everyday kindness over high-end finishes.
Yet the layout and size present clear limits. The rooms are small, with two beds per room and a shared bathroom arrangement that, while containing two separate facilities, does compromise privacy for some residents. The building is described as an older house converted into a nursing/outpatient setting, and while staff and care quality can compensate, the physical footprint may feel dated to those accustomed to newer campuses. The āhouse-likeā feel can be charming, but it may also lack the breadth of social spaces, activities, and robust clinical amenities that many families expect from contemporary assisted living communities.
In weighing pros against cons, the personal touch and homelike vibe often offset the trade-offs for the right resident. For families prioritizing caregiver attentiveness, visible staff investment in resident well-being, and a setting that feels like a comfortable, small community, Shady Lane delivers meaningful value. The challenge remains for those whose loved ones require dementia-focused programming, greater privacy, or more expansive common areas. Here, the decision hinges on whether the priority is emotional comfort and family-style caregiving within a modest footprint, or a facility that emphasizes formal memory care ecosystems and modern, purpose-built accommodations.
Practically, this community should be chosen by families who are comfortable with a quieter, intimate environment and who can align expectations around room size and privacy. Before committing, request a thorough tour, meet the caregiving team, and clarify what level of daily support is included and what specialized services are available for memory-impaired residents. Ask about room options, how activity schedules are structured, and what happens if more intensive assistance becomes necessary. If memory care is a future need, or if privacy and contemporary amenities are non-negotiable, alternatives that specialize in dementia care and newer, more expansive layouts will likely serve the loved one better.


















Understanding Hospice Care at Home: Comprehensive Services, Key Benefits, and Eligibility
Understanding the Full Cost of 24/7 In-Home Care: A Detailed Overview
Exploring the World of Home Health Nurses: Qualifications, Roles, and Hiring Tips