11010 East Colorado Drive, Aurora, CO 80012
To contact a resident: (303) 695-7777
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Aspen View Living Costs & Pricing
Aspen View Living offers competitive pricing for residential options, particularly when compared to the broader market in Denver County and across Colorado. For those seeking semi-private accommodations, Aspen View Living provides a cost-effective rate of $2,000 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,950 and the state average of $4,009. Similarly, for private rooms priced at $3,000 per month, residents can enjoy substantial savings compared to Denver County's rate of $4,178 and Colorado's average of $4,142. This affordability combined with quality care makes Aspen View Living an appealing choice for individuals seeking supportive living environments without compromising on comfort or value.
| Floor plans | Aspen View Living | Denver County | Colorado |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,000 | $3,950 | $4,008 |
| Private | $3,000 | $4,178 | $4,142 |
Overall Review of Aspen View Living
Pros
Aspen View Living is described as a model for assisted living and a true home, not about flashy amenities.- Derek Main, one of the owners, is available seven days a week and checks on residents frequently.
- Lorie the caregiver is attentive and has a heart of gold.
- The owners are hands-on and always available when care is needed.
- Lori's cooking is wonderful and contributes to a caring environment.
- The facility is nice, clean, and well-maintained, offering a five-star living experience.
Cons
The weekend caretaker was so bad that the reviewer would file a report with the State. - They told the family they could care for their mother until end of life, then said they couldn’t and insisted she be moved.
- The weekend caretaker would throw the resident into bed and refuse to answer the call light.
- If the resident needed to go to the bathroom, she would have to lie in it all night because the caretaker refused to change her.
- The staff seemed unconcerned about the resident’s back pain and rough handling worsened her condition.
- The caretaker would get mad if the plates weren’t re-set exactly, prioritizing items over care.
- The weekend caretaker was constantly on the phone and not attending to residents’ needs.
- The owner wouldn’t respond after numerous attempts to contact him and supplies were repeatedly run out.
- They misrepresented 24-hour care and failed to provide adequate care for the resident’s needs.
- Several staff were rude and unfriendly, signaling a generally poor environment.
Review
Aspen View Living in Aurora is best suited for seniors who want a small, home-like assisted living arrangement where the owners are deeply involved, and daily routines can be tailored to individual needs. It serves well for residents who require steady daytime assistance, help with basic activities of daily living, and regular check-ins, but who do not demand continuous skilled nursing or comprehensive nocturnal medical oversight. Families should consider alternatives if the loved one needs reliable night-time supervision, complex wound or catheter care, advanced incontinence management, or end-of-life nursing that a six-resident operation may not sustain.
The strongest positives rest on proximity of care and personal accountability. The on-site ownership model means Derek Main is often available seven days a week, and Lori, the caregiver/house manager, is repeatedly described as genuinely caring with a heart for seniors. The environment matters here: a clean, intimate setting that feels like a true home rather than a hospital or resort. The staff’s hands-on approach, coupled with direct access to leadership, translates into timely attention to day-to-day needs, and even with limited staff, families note meaningful, consistent contact about evolving conditions. Also cited are practical strengths such as home-cooked meals, a straightforward, no-nonsense operation, and a space that prioritizes comfort and dignity over flashy amenities.
Yet the picture is not one of universal readiness. Several reviews flag a critical gap in night-time coverage and acuity handling. Instances where weekend staff were unresponsive or rough, refusing to respond to call lights, placing residents in uncomfortable positions, or failing to meet nighttime needs, pose serious concerns about safety and dignity when assistance is most needed. Other families report misalignment between promises of 24-hour care and actual capabilities, and at least one account notes the owner’s limited responsiveness to earnest concerns. These gaps are not minor frictions; they strike at the core question of whether acute or nocturnal care can be sustained in a small, non-nursing setting.
The pros can offset some drawbacks for the right resident, but only to a point. For a senior who values a warm, individualized approach, a home-like rhythm, and dependable daytime support, Aspen View offers a compelling fit. The personal touch from Lori and Derek, along with a reputation for attentive communications and consistent cooking quality, can translate into meaningful daily security and comfort. The facility’s intimate size and frequent owner involvement provide a sense of accountability that larger communities sometimes lose. In other words, for folks who can live with occasional nighttime gaps and a lower level of medical redundancy, the day-to-day care is often strong enough to justify consideration.
However, families with higher acuity needs should proceed with caution. If a loved one requires robust 24/7 nursing oversight, complex nighttime assistance, continuous incontinence management, or frequent medical interventions, Aspen View’s model may underdeliver. The risk of unanswered call lights, delayed responses, or caregivers overwhelmed by the pace of nighttime needs can erode safety and peace of mind. The mismatch between expectations, especially in cases where “end-of-life care” or “full assist” was promised, and the actual capabilities can lead to prolonged stress for families during a difficult transition. In these scenarios, a facility with more formal nursing staff and longer-established night-shift coverage may be a more reliable fit.
In deciding, the prudent path is to treat Aspen View as a strong candidate for careful, occasions-based placement rather than a universal solution. Prospective families should verify current staffing levels, request to speak with multiple families about after-hours experiences, and insist on a clear, written acuity plan that spells out what “full assist” entails in practice. Seek a realistic timetable for responses to call lights and a documented process for escalating concerns after hours. If a transition to a higher level of care becomes necessary, have a clear understanding of transfer options to a facility with 24/7 nursing or specialized end-of-life services. Aspen View can be a wonderful home for the right senior; for those with significant nocturnal care needs or acute medical requirements, it warrants strong caution and alternative comparisons.
8 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Independent Living
Respite Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities on-site
Air-conditioning
Bath tubs
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Private bathrooms
Small library
Telephone
Denver International (16 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.
An Extensive Exploration of the VA Aid and Attendance Benefit
