17708 Crenshaw Blve, Torrance, CA 90504
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Summerland Manor Costs & Pricing
Summerland Manor offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to both Los Angeles County and the broader California state averages. For a semi-private room, Summerland Manor charges $2,500 per month, significantly lower than the county rate of $3,349 and the state average of $3,333. Similarly, its private rooms at $3,000 are more affordable than the county's $4,197 and slightly under the state's figure of $3,939. Additionally, for studio accommodations, Summerland Manor maintains a price of $3,000 while local and state costs stand at $4,172 and $4,145 respectively. This structure not only demonstrates Summerland Manor's commitment to providing quality care but also highlights its value as an attractive option for potential residents seeking affordability without compromising on comfort.
| Floor plans | Summerland Manor | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,500 | $3,349 | $3,333 |
| Studio | $3,000 | $4,172 | $4,145 |
| Private | $3,000 | $4,197 | $3,939 |
Overall Review of Summerland Manor
Pros
The facility had a full-time nurse on staff.- The environment was clean.
- The atmosphere was fun.
- The early days were great for the resident.
Cons
The staff did not interact with residents and left them in front of a TV all day, CNN on.- A nurse visited only once a week, and the commode had been shoved dirty into the uncle's closet.
- They placed the uncle on palliative care with no explanation.
- When checked out by a new doctor, a cancerous growth on his backside was found that had not been previously reported, though it had likely been present for months.
- Stimulus checks disappeared and there were problems getting their deposit back.
- They do not keep medical records at the house.
- Prior to the mother's stay, no evaluation was done, and they decided they could not keep her there.
- The reviewer had to report them to the ombudsman.
- The mother was restrained in a wheelchair by a knitted blanket.
- The reviewer warned others not to put a loved one in any of their homes.
Review
Summerland Manor in Torrance is best suited for families that can tolerate very light supervision and a notably lean level of medical oversight. The setting may appeal to those prioritizing a low-cost option and a clean, basic environment, but it is not a fit for residents who require reliable nursing, ongoing medical monitoring, or timely clinical decisions. Explicitly, anyone with medical needs, mobility limitations, dementia, or a expectation of hands-on care should consider alternatives. For families with limited time or resources to oversee care, there are safer options elsewhere. In practice, this community serves only a narrow niche: the very low-demand resident whose care needs are minimal and whose family can supervise care outside the facility.
Early impressions in the record point to a different narrative. Initial years reportedly featured a full-time nurse on staff and a generally clean, engaging atmosphere, elements that suggested respectable oversight and a routine that could feel safe and pleasant. Such positives, however, proved unsustainable as problems emerged. The one-time positives create a fragile impression, because the long-term reality reveals a collapse in care standards that undermines any initial confidence. The contrast between those first months and later experiences is critical for families evaluating whether a short-term impression can be trusted to persist.
The core failures are not cosmetic; they cut to the heart of daily safety and accountability. Nursing oversight diminished to a once-a-week presence, and serious lapses appeared in basic care practices. A commode found shoved into a closet and left dirty points to neglect and a lack of everyday hygiene discipline. The addition of palliative care with no accompanying explanation adds layers of confusion and a troubling pattern of unclear medical decision-making. Even more troubling, findings of a cancerous growth that reportedly existed for months underscore gaps in assessment, documentation, and proactive medical review. These are not incidental issues; they signal a system that does not reliably monitor or protect residents.
Financial and administrative issues compound the danger. Allegations of missing stimulus funds and problems with recovering a deposited amount reveal a troubling level of financial mismanagement or at least poor handling of resident funds. Medical records reportedly were not kept on-site, and prospective residents encountered a lack of pre-admission evaluation. The cumulative effect of these administrative failures erodes trust and increases the risk for families who depend on transparent, compliant operations. The experience culminates in a difficult outcome: a resident was deemed unable to remain in the facility, a decision that underscores deeper questions about the facility’s capacity to meet ongoing care requirements.
From a decision-making perspective, the limited and fading positives do not offset the weight of the cons. The initial advantages, cleanliness and a staffed nurse, are rendered meaningless by deteriorating care, insufficient staff interaction with residents, and minimal engagement beyond passive television viewing. Safety concerns, documentation gaps, and contested financial handling tilt the balance decisively toward caution. This community is not suitable for anyone whose daily life depends on consistent care, proactive medical management, or transparent operations. Alternatives that deliver steady nursing oversight, meaningful resident interaction, and clear policies will serve families far better.
Final guidance emphasizes avoidance for most cases. Do not place a loved one here if ongoing medical oversight, dignity, and reliable staff engagement are non-negotiable. Prospective families should pursue communities with demonstrated staffing reliability, transparent medical records practices, and strong regulatory compliance. When evaluating options, insist on current licensure status, request written policies on medical evaluations, palliative care, and financial handling, and speak directly with multiple staff members and residents about daily routines and supervision levels. A cautious, evidence-based tour and due diligence now can prevent a costly, emotionally draining mismatch later.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Small library
Telephone
Los Angeles International (7 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
A Thorough Discussion of Medications Potentially Linked to Dementia Risk
Why Do Dementia Patients Sleep So Much? Understanding Oversleeping, Stages, and Care Approaches
8 Key Indicators That Suggest It May Be Time to Transition from Assisted Living to Skilled Nursing Care